Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH vs Universidad La Salle - ULSA vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs ISDI Madrid Digital Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 66 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Unique specializations in social sciences and history
- +Academic excellence and quality professors
- +Career-focused and demanding programs
- +High academic quality and relevant professional skills
- +Integral and human education with strong values
- +Friendly environment and positive student community
- +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
- +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
- +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Flexible executive plan accommodates work and study
- +Supportive professors and coordinators
- +High-quality design education and fostering diverse perspectives
- +Active, collaborative student life with community and creative experimentation
- +Commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, including unreliable internet and inadequate classroom technology.
- -Administrative and management issues, such as uninvestigated false accusations.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
- -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring complaint.
- -Lack of adequate support, both academic and personal, is a significant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance create an unpleasant environment.
- -Inconsistent and unclear communication from instructors leads to confusion.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its value, receiving a perfect score. Professors and location are also significant strengths, both rated highly at 4.5. Student life and accommodation are well-regarded, achieving a solid 4. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which both received a rating of 3.5.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance, particularly in its **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving excellent ratings. **Facilities** also stand out positively. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement. The remaining categories, including Student Life, Internationality, and Value, indicate a solid, middle-ground performance.
This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
This institution shines in two key areas: receiving top marks for its professors and its value. Conversely, the university faces significant challenges, with facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all receiving the lowest possible ratings. Its internationality is a mid-range strength, scoring a respectable four out of five.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, and student life all received perfect scores, indicating a highly positive experience in these aspects. However, accommodation and internationality are notable weaknesses, scoring significantly lower. Value for money is also rated highly.
With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 3 reviews, the university is highly regarded. Positive feedback highlights excellent professors, academic excellence, and unique specializations like Ethnohistory. There is no negative feedback.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~82%), highlighting academic quality, skill development, and valuable life lessons. A small amount of negative feedback (~5.9%) mentions issues like outdated facilities and poor internet.
University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Nothing to show
The sole review is highly positive, with ~100% of feedback rating 5/5. Students highlight the flexibility of executive programs and supportive professors/coordinators. No negative feedback was received.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise its commitment to creative and socially conscious education, high-quality design programs, and fostering a diverse, collaborative environment. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
EDINBA is undoubtedly distinguished by its commitment to creative, critical, and socially conscious education. As a public institution, it offers access to high-quality design education, fostering diverse perspectives and constant exchange among students. Student life is characterized by an active and collaborative environment, where workshops, exhibitions, and collective projects strengthen a sense of community and encourage creative experimentation. Addressing current challenges in the field of design—such as digitalization, sustainability, and changes in creative processes—the school seeks to prepare its students to respond ethically and innovatively to the demands of the contemporary context.
