Escuela Nacional de Antropología e Historia - ENAH vs Universidad La Salle - ULSA vs Universidad Interamericana para el Desarrollo - UNID vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 76 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Unique specializations in social sciences and history
- +Academic excellence and quality professors
- +Career-focused and demanding programs
- +High academic quality and strong professional skills development.
- +Integral and humanistic education fostering values and personal growth.
- +Friendly environment and supportive community contribute to a positive learning experience.
- +Personalized attention and accessible learning environment
- +High quality teaching from knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Innovative programs and focus on student development
- +Integral formation and practical application of knowledge
- +Focus on developing leaders with values and strategic vision
- +Academic excellence, personal growth, and community engagement
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and understandable teaching with focus on applied learning.
- +Excellent educational programs and certifications.
- +Great facilities contributing to a satisfactory experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a problem.
- -Outdated facilities and unreliable internet are major issues.
- -Administrative and management issues, including false accusations, are a significant concern.
- -Poor academic quality and lack of support from staff.
- -Unrealistic expectations and inconsiderate policies for students.
- -Lack of professionalism and knowledge from some teachers.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a recurring problem.
- -Students face difficulties with unresponsive administrative and management issues.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Nothing to show
- -Lack of timely and effective communication.
- -Inconsistent and unfair grading practices.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities and resources.
This institution garners exceptional praise for its value, receiving a perfect score. Professors and location are also significant strengths, both rated highly at 4.5. Student life and accommodation are well-regarded, achieving a solid 4. Areas for potential improvement include facilities and internationality, which both received a rating of 3.5.
This university garners its highest marks in Location, with a strong showing for Professors and Student Life as well. Areas for potential improvement include Accommodations and Facilities, which received the lowest ratings. The university's Internationality and Value also represent solid mid-range scores.
Analysis of these university ratings reveals a mixed picture. The strongest areas include **Facilities**, scoring 3.55, and **Location** at 3.5. **Professors** and **Value** also received respectable scores around 3.1. Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.125) and **Internationality** (2.08) present the most significant areas for improvement, alongside **Student Life** at 2.875.
This university garners strong feedback, particularly excelling in **Accomodation** and **Student Life**, both scoring an impressive 4.67. **Value** and **Internationality** also received high marks. Areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **Professors** at 4.42, which represents the weakest performance among the evaluated aspects. Facilities and location are rated very favorably, around 4.5.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptional scores in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Internationality all received perfect marks, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. Value also stands out with a top rating. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a moderate score of 3. Location also performed well, but was not as strong as the top-rated categories.
With an average rating of 4.67/5 from 3 reviews, the university is highly regarded. Positive feedback highlights excellent professors, academic excellence, and unique specializations like Ethnohistory. There is no negative feedback.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, approximately 83% of 18 reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic quality and values. A small amount of negative feedback mentioned outdated facilities.
~74% of students provide positive feedback, praising personalized attention and good teachers. However, ~28.6% of feedback expresses concerns about slow administration and inconsistent teacher quality.
University students overwhelmingly praise its integral formation, practical study plans, and focus on developing leaders. This ~100% positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, professional readiness, and personal growth opportunities.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the feedback highlights excellent teachers, effective learning methods, and great facilities. This overwhelmingly positive sentiment (~100%) indicates a strong student satisfaction.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
If you are thinking about signing up here, I recommend that you better look for a serious university and not a duckling like this one. I tell you my experience: Of the teachers I had since the first semester, I can tell you that 3 are salvable, from then on the others leave much to be desired, from lack of professionalism to lack of knowledge about the subject they "taught". They are excellent collectors and they worry a lot because you pay in advance. They send you emails, SMS, WhatsApp, but when it comes to important information, like when your group is no longer profitable and you will have to take classes if you want with another career or to let you know that I do not know who happened to have 5 hours of a subject with only one teacher at a time is a good idea when you have 6 semesters there ... For that there is nothing, no emails, calls, WhatsApp, absolutely nothing. The truth is, if you enter this university, you must be ready to how badly they'll treat you, won't follow up, will make changes without notifying you, won't consult you, will lie constantly and won't look you in the eyes ... The last thing was that I asked for my monthly reimbursement since they never gave us an option that will work for us and that my transcript of matters has no cost to me since they were the ones who did not fulfill their part of the deal and Reyna dares to lie, saying that I would pass my leave, complaint, and request ... It never did, it took 3 weeks without a solution. Today I finally spoke with someone else and I hope to have my leave and papers soon. And if they do not return my money, I hope they ask their God to forgive them for all the ball of lies they say because on earth they are going to turn off. In the end, do not waste your money and time, it's not worth it.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
