University of Vigo vs Higher Institute Of Applied Science And Technology Of Sousse - ISSATSO vs Govt Shaheed Smrity College - GSS College vs Higher Institute of Management of Sousse - ISG Sousse vs Ecole Polytechnique Sousse

Side-by-side comparison from 88 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
University of Vigo: wins 0/4 categories
Higher Institute Of Applied Science And Technology Of Sousse - ISSATSO: wins 0/4 categories
Govt Shaheed Smrity College - GSS College: wins 0/4 categories
Higher Institute of Management of Sousse - ISG Sousse: wins 0/4 categories
Ecole Polytechnique Sousse: wins 0/4 categories
University of Oslo: wins 4/4 categories
École supérieure des sciences et de la technologie de Hammam Sousse - ESSTHS: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Best programme: Software Engineering
Best programme: Engineering
Best programme: Business Intelligence
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Trondheim, Norway
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Social Arts
Category ratings
Facilities
3.89
4.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
3.50
4.50
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
3.89
4.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.72
4.00
3.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Student life
3.94
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Value
3.94
4.50
4.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Accommodation
3.94
4.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and strong academic programs
  • +Welcoming and diverse student environment
  • +High employability and available student support services
  • +Academic excellence and exam success
  • +Vibrant student life and new connections
  • +Engaging club activities
  • +Friendly and helpful teachers
  • +Positive social environment and friendships
  • +Excellent education and engaging projects
  • +Convenient location and friendly environment
  • +Welcoming to international French-speaking students

Nothing to show

  • +Insightful understanding of Norwegian welfare model
  • +Exploration of universalism, public sector strength, and social solidarity
  • +Balance of economic competitiveness and social protection

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues, including unclear course structures.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities require urgent repairs.
  • -Poor transportation links and distance from the city.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hampers learning effectively.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
  • -The curriculum lacks depth and practical application.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Student feedback indicates a generally positive university experience, with **Student Life** being the standout area. The university also received strong marks for its **Professors** and **Accommodation**. Areas that performed less strongly include **Location** and **Facilities**. **Internationality** and **Value** received good, though not exceptional, scores.

This institution scores highly in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for Student Life and a strong 4.5 for both Location and Value. Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Internationality are also well-regarded, all receiving a solid 4. The weakest, though still positive, area is represented by the Facilities, Professors, Accomodation, and Internationality ratings.

This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, most notably for its **Professors and Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities, Location, and Accommodation are also well-regarded, each earning a solid 4. The university's weakest area, however, lies in its **Internationality**, which received a moderate rating of 3. Overall, the Value for money is rated positively at 4.

This institution demonstrates particular strength in its **internationality**, receiving a perfect score. Other well-regarded aspects include professors, location, student life, and value, all earning solid 4s. Its facilities and accommodation are areas where improvement could be beneficial, both scoring a 3.

Nothing to show

Remarkably, this institution achieved a perfect score of 5 out of 5 in every evaluated category. The facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all considered outstanding. There are no apparent weak areas, as all aspects of the university have been rated at the highest possible level.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good careers, excellent professors, and a welcoming student environment. A small percentage of negative feedback exists, with one mention of outdated evaluation regulations and another of faculty issues.

With an average rating of 3.5/5 and ~50% positive feedback, students praise academics and student life, including meeting new people and engaging in clubs. No negative reviews were provided.

This university has a perfect 5/5 average rating from 1 review. The positive feedback (~100%) highlights enjoyment and supportive, kind teachers. No negative reviews were provided.

With an average rating of 4/5, this university is highly praised for its quality education, engaging projects, and ideal location. Students found it to be a great place for study and particularly beneficial for French-speaking international students.

Nothing to show

Based on one review, the university received a perfect 5/5 rating. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a comprehensive understanding of the Norwegian welfare model.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
12%
0%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
53%
50%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
33%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close