Dublin Institute of Technology - DIT vs University College Dublin - UCD vs University of Limerick - UL vs ONCAMPUS Global vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie
Side-by-side comparison from 220 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, applied learning with real-world focus.
- +Accessible faculty and strong student support.
- +Central location and active academic atmosphere.
- +Strong academic programs and engaging courses
- +Vibrant campus life and social opportunities
- +Welcoming environment and helpful staff
- +Practical skills and career preparation
- +Supportive and friendly academic staff and community
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
- +Excellent facilities and convenient location
- +Strong academic and personal development support
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Passionate and supportive faculty with personalized attention
- +Strong focus on student success and career development
- +Welcoming city environment and convenient accommodations
- +Small class sizes and supportive, helpful faculty.
- +Practical and in-depth course structures with hands-on learning.
- +Vibrant campus life and inclusive, diverse environment.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant issue.
- -Administrative and management inefficiencies cause frequent frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues, particularly regarding support for international students.
- -Inflexible and traditional teaching styles that hinder engagement.
- -Difficulty in fostering social connections within a large student body.
- -Lack of career guidance and irrelevant research suggestions from faculty.
- -Poor quality of education and facilities not worth the cost.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep frustrate students.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support services are common complaints.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Administrative and financial mismanagement, including delayed refunds and staff turnover.
- -Concerns about academic stability and frequent changes in teaching staff.
- -Administrative and management issues are a consistent problem.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging content and effective teaching methods are noted.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and location, receiving the highest marks in these areas. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score. Professors and internationality are also positively rated, alongside a solid showing for value and facilities. Overall, the university offers a generally favorable experience, though areas for improvement, particularly in housing, are evident.
Overall, this institution garners favorable reviews across several key areas. Professors are exceptionally rated, indicating strong academic instruction. Student life and internationality also received high marks, suggesting a vibrant and diverse campus environment. Facilities and value are also well-regarded. The weakest area, however, is accommodation, which has a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects of the university experience.
Analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive reception. The strongest area is **Value** (4.32), closely followed by **Professors** (4.28) and **Student Life** (4.23). **Accommodations** stand out as the weakest point, receiving the lowest rating at 3.94. Other categories like Facilities and Internationality also scored well above average.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings across various aspects. Professors are exceptionally well-regarded, achieving the highest score. Location and Internationality also stand out with excellent marks. Student Life, Facilities, and Value also reflect positive sentiment. Accommodation, while still strong, receives the lowest rating among the surveyed categories.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
This institution's strengths lie in its **Professors**, with a solid rating of 3.86, and its **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring 3.71. Conversely, areas requiring improvement include **Facilities** and **Student Life**, each receiving a 2.87 rating. **Location** and **Accommodation** fall in the mid-range, with scores of 3.2 and 2.93 respectively.
This institution scores exceptionally well in student life and internationality, both earning a high 4.5. Its location is also a significant strength at 4.25. Areas receiving a solid rating include facilities, accommodation, and value, all at 4. Professors represent the weakest point among the surveyed categories, with an average rating of 3.75.
With ~76% positive reviews and an average of 4.06/5, students highlight practical learning, helpful faculty, and strong community. No negative feedback was reported.
University reviews are predominantly positive (~93%), praising the great campus, amenities, lecturers, and social/cultural opportunities. A small fraction (~3%) of feedback expresses concerns, such as difficulty making friends and feeling like a second-class citizen as an international student.
With an average rating of 4.24/5, approximately 99% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent facilities, practical skills, and a vibrant learning atmosphere. A single negative review mentioned concerns about career prospects and faculty motivation.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% of 20 feedback entries rating 4–5 stars. Students praise friendly, supportive teachers, excellent facilities like the library, and effective student support services that build confidence.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Most (approximately 86%) of the 14 reviews are highly positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive faculty, small class sizes, and career development. A small percentage (~7%) of feedback mentioned financial issues and staff retention.
Students report a highly positive experience, praising small class sizes, strong faculty support, and vibrant campus life. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative, with no negative reviews recorded.
Nothing to show
Large student population (~30k), difficult to make friends because of irregular lecture structure (at least in humanities dept.) and most Irish students having known others for some time—not to say they aren’t friendly or open to making new friends, just a bit harder to fit in. Professors know what they are talking about and want you to learn, however the overall teaching style at UCD (and most universities)—is composed of listening to someone talk for 45 minutes, taking notes, and then writing an essay worth over half your grade—can feel like pursuing an overwhelmingly exhausting and pointless daily routine. Because of it, I was put on antidepressants. Prepare to replace your identity with an eight-digit number. Unlikely that professors will recognize you due to large lectures, so if you are like me and need to connect with your teachers in order to be a more productive learner, avoid UCD. There are mixed opinions about this, but I personally think that the campus is ugly. Not only is it littered with awful 70s architecture, but they also keep building new things so it is constantly under construction, which is not the most pleasant sight to observe every day. Although, some of the newer buildings, like the science building (which is massive), are nice. The campus is about a one-hour bus ride from the city centre, located in a middle-of-nowhere suburban area of Dublin, so it feels somewhat dull and isolated. Dorm rooms/suites are fantastic except for the fact that most do not have ovens and the showers are as narrow as you are (but perhaps that is to be expected in a dorm). Otherwise, good balance between privacy and sociability, most students have their own rooms but share a common space. Although, rent and goods are expensive and keep getting worse. Student Union fails to fulfil its promises, holds non-competitive elections and prevents foreign students from running for positions, all while the school prides itself on its global diversity. It is a very diverse school, though, that much is true. People from all over the world come here to study, so you're bound to meet someone from a different culture/background. Absolutely dead on the weekends. There is a myriad of societies to join that are fun and free to be a part of, but it can be difficult to balance schoolwork and club activities. Relatively easy to change subjects, variety of modules and subjects to choose from (Archeology was my favourite). The food market every Thursday was the best part of being here. Kind of expensive, but totally worth it. Every year in February they celebrate the Chinese New Year with a small light festival, and it is... awesome. Good food, cool lantern setup near the lake, an art show, and they host amazing dance, singing, and musical performances. UCD is #1 for graduate employability in Ireland, so if you are a career-oriented student, this might be a good place for you. Lots of career options and help from the school. Dublin is truly an amazing city and Ireland is a beautiful country. I do not regret coming here at all and seeing the island, but University College Dublin was not a good fit for me, and if you are anything like me and these issues bother you, it probably would not be a good fit for you either.
I am currently studying a Masters in International Entrepreneurship Management this programme develops entrepreneurial creativity, awareness and specialist knowledge to help establish, manage and grow innovative new ventures across a variety of industry settings, incorporating a range of in-company projects to give ‘real world’ experience. Participants explore their own entrepreneurial potential and prepare an investor-ready business plan. I have always wanted to start my own business and this programme equipped me with the tools and skills to do this. Throughout the programme, we were able to work with real-life businesses and consult for them on a regular basis. For example in a module called international business consulting we worked for one of the biggest PPE distributors in the EU. We developed a market entry strategy for the company Irema and outlined how they could advance into the US market. Furthermore, for the final year project, we had to work with a small enterprise and establish a two-year commercialisation plan for them. This was really great fun and gave a practical experience that you wouldn’t be able to get in any other programme.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
