Dublin Institute of Technology - DIT vs Trinity College Dublin - TCD vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Trinity Business School vs American College Dublin - ACD

Side-by-side comparison from 96 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Trinity Business School (5.00)
Dublin Institute of Technology - DIT: wins 0/7 categories
Trinity College Dublin - TCD: wins 3/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
Trinity Business School: wins 4/7 categories
American College Dublin - ACD: wins 0/7 categories
ABC Business Academy: wins 0/7 categories
Royal College of Physicians of Ireland: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Economics and Social Science (BESS)
Best programme: International Business
Toronto, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
3.81
4.07
4.00
5.00
Win
2.87
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.20
4.60
Win
3.57
4.00
3.20
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.19
4.26
4.00
5.00
Win
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
3.94
4.23
Win
4.14
4.00
3.71
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.50
4.27
3.71
5.00
Win
2.87
Not rated
Not rated
Value
3.88
4.39
Win
4.00
4.00
3.71
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
3.38
3.36
3.50
5.00
Win
2.93
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, applied learning with real-world focus.
  • +Accessible faculty and strong student support.
  • +Central location and active academic atmosphere.
  • +High-quality teaching and supportive lecturers
  • +Beautiful campus and convenient location
  • +Rich academic atmosphere and flexible course options
  • +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
  • +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
  • +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
  • +Strong sense of community and inclusive environment
  • +Opportunities for networking and professional growth
  • +Supportive and collaborative atmosphere
  • +Passionate and supportive faculty with personalized attention
  • +Strong focus on student success and career development
  • +Welcoming city environment and convenient accommodations

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant issue.
  • -Administrative and management inefficiencies cause frequent frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues caused frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hindered learning experiences.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty and staff was a recurring problem.
  • -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities
  • -Lack of resources & support
  • -Administrative and financial mismanagement, including delayed refunds and staff turnover.
  • -Concerns about academic stability and frequent changes in teaching staff.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and location, receiving the highest marks in these areas. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score. Professors and internationality are also positively rated, alongside a solid showing for value and facilities. Overall, the university offers a generally favorable experience, though areas for improvement, particularly in housing, are evident.

This university garners excellent scores, particularly excelling in **Location** (4.6) and **Student Life** (4.27). Professors are also highly regarded (4.26), with strong internationality (4.23) and value (4.39). The weakest area, however, is **Accomodation**, which received a significantly lower rating (3.36). Facilities also scored moderately well (4.07).

This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.

Exceptional marks are awarded for **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation**, all receiving a perfect score. The university also fares well in **Internationality** and **Value**, both rated a solid 4. The **Location** is its least high-scoring aspect, though still considered good at a 4.

This institution's strengths lie in its **Professors**, with a solid rating of 3.86, and its **Internationality** and **Value**, both scoring 3.71. Conversely, areas requiring improvement include **Facilities** and **Student Life**, each receiving a 2.87 rating. **Location** and **Accommodation** fall in the mid-range, with scores of 3.2 and 2.93 respectively.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~76% positive reviews and an average of 4.06/5, students highlight practical learning, helpful faculty, and strong community. No negative feedback was reported.

The university receives strong positive feedback (~86%), with students praising excellent teacher resources, academic achievements, and teaching quality. Many also highlight a beautiful campus and convenient location, with lecturers being knowledgeable and supportive. No negative reviews were recorded.

Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights a strong sense of community and a supportive, inclusive environment. Positive feedback emphasizes networking and personal/professional growth opportunities.

Most (approximately 86%) of the 14 reviews are highly positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive faculty, small class sizes, and career development. A small percentage (~7%) of feedback mentioned financial issues and staff retention.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
29%
32%
43%
100%
7%
0%
0%
4★
47%
54%
29%
0%
79%
0%
0%
3★
24%
14%
14%
0%
7%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
14%
0%
7%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close