Dublin Institute of Technology - DIT vs Dublin City University - DCU vs University of Galway vs National University of Ireland Maynooth - NUIM vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie
Side-by-side comparison from 161 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, applied learning with real-world focus.
- +Accessible faculty and strong student support.
- +Central location and active academic atmosphere.
- +Dedicated and supportive lecturers
- +Welcoming and friendly student community
- +Positive and smooth overall university experience
- +Engaging and supportive faculty
- +Vibrant campus life and ample opportunities
- +Modern facilities and strong academic programs
- +Excellent teaching and supportive faculty
- +Diverse and inclusive campus with engaging student life and events
- +Comprehensive facilities including library and sports
- +Connecting theory to practice through real-world cases.
- +Diverse international environment and global opportunities.
- +Relevant industry-focused courses and knowledgeable faculty.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a significant issue.
- -Administrative and management inefficiencies cause frequent frustration.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are major drawbacks.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and insufficient support hinder learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
- -Perceived as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and location, receiving the highest marks in these areas. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score. Professors and internationality are also positively rated, alongside a solid showing for value and facilities. Overall, the university offers a generally favorable experience, though areas for improvement, particularly in housing, are evident.
This university garners favorable ratings across most aspects, with **Professors** and **Value** standing out as the strongest areas, both scoring above 4.3. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also receive high marks, exceeding 4.2. **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are well-regarded, with scores around 4.0 and 4.1 respectively. The **Location** is the weakest performing category, though still respectable at 3.75.
This institution performs exceptionally well in several key areas. Its professors are highly rated, reflecting a strong academic foundation. Location and value also receive favorable scores. While generally positive, student life and accommodation are the relatively weaker aspects compared to other surveyed categories.
With a solid overall performance, the university excels particularly in its **Professors**, earning a high rating of 4.25. Student life and location also received positive marks. The areas with the lowest scores are **Accomodation** at 3.5 and **Facilities** at 3.6, suggesting these aspects could benefit from further development to match the university's other strengths.
This institution performs well across most aspects, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest area. Facilities, Professors, and Value also receive high marks. Areas for potential improvement include **Location**, which scored the lowest, and Accomodation. Student life and the overall value proposition are rated solidly in the mid-to-high range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With ~76% positive reviews and an average of 4.06/5, students highlight practical learning, helpful faculty, and strong community. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 4.49 average rating from 61 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent lecturers, a welcoming community, and a positive academic experience.
With a 4.1/5 average rating from 59 reviews, nearly all feedback highlights a supportive atmosphere, engaging teachers, and excellent facilities. Vibrant campus life and academic rigor are also frequently mentioned. No negative reviews were recorded.
With an average rating of 4.06/5, ~74% of reviews are highly positive, praising contemporary amenities, lively campus environment, and exceptional teaching quality. A small amount of feedback notes location accessibility challenges.
Most reviews (approximately 71%) highlight a positive learning atmosphere, inspiring professors, and valuable international experiences. A small amount of feedback (around 14%) suggests mediocrity and a focus on profit. The average rating is 3.86/5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show