SKEMA Business School vs Arizona State University - ASU vs Simon Business School vs Schiller International University vs Wagner College - WC
Side-by-side comparison from 381 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, industry-focused learning and career opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and personal growth
- +Excellent teaching quality and supportive student life
- +Engaging community and supportive people
- +Critical thinking development and personal growth
- +Practical learning experiences and helpful advisors
Nothing to show
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and career growth
- +Supportive and organized academic environment
- +Supportive and invested professors
- +Welcoming campus community and integration
- +Safe and comfortable environment
- +exceptional, supportive faculty
- +transformative, holistic program approach
- +intellectual rigor and personal growth
- +Experiential learning and business creation
- +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
- +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and exam management.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Disorganized programs and overwhelming course loads with inconsistent evaluation methods.
- -Lack of support and consideration for online students, particularly those with work or family commitments.
- -Poor quality of instruction and unhelpful teaching assistants.
Nothing to show
- -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
- -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
- -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.
- -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
With a well-rounded set of evaluations, this university demonstrates particular strengths in **Internationality** and **Professors**, both receiving exceptionally high scores. **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest rating, suggesting room for improvement. Other categories like Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value are all rated positively, indicating a generally favorable student experience.
This institution performs exceptionally well in academics, with Professors earning the highest rating at 4.65. Facilities and Location also receive strong marks around 4.4. Student Life, while still positive, is the lowest-rated category at 4.28, indicating a potential area for improvement in extracurricular engagement and campus atmosphere.
Nothing to show
The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, achieving a high rating of 4.5. **Accommodations** also score well at nearly 4.0. Conversely, **location** received the lowest rating, a less impressive 3.55. Other areas like facilities, student life, internationality, and value fall within a respectable mid-to-high range, generally above 3.5.
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, internationality, and value. These strengths suggest a robust academic environment with excellent accessibility and global outlook, all at a high value for students. Conversely, the university's weakest points are its facilities, student life, and accommodation, all of which scored zero. This indicates significant areas for improvement in campus infrastructure, social engagement, and housing provisions.
This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.
The vast majority of reviews (~91%) praise the university for personal and professional growth opportunities, strong industry links, and excellent teaching quality. A small percentage of feedback (~2.4%) mentions poor management and communication.
With an average rating of 4.47/5 from 167 reviews, approximately 98.8% are positive, highlighting rewarding academic experiences, community, and facilities. A small fraction of feedback noted issues with online course structure and TA helpfulness.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.
Virtually all feedback is positive (~100%), highlighting welcoming campuses, excellent and supportive professors, and a strong sense of community. Some students mentioned campus activities and security positively.
With a 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review praises the transformative PhD program, highlighting exceptional faculty and unique educational approaches. No negative feedback was provided.
With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
I like how comprehensive and well-rounded all of the knowledge I have so far learned during my studies has been. However, some instructors refuse to modernize their curricula and continue to teach in their antiquated ways.
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
