SKEMA Business School vs Universidade Federal do Pará - UFPA vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Universidade Estadual de Londrina vs Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto

Side-by-side comparison from 196 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/5 categories
Universidade Federal do Pará - UFPA: wins 2/5 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/5 categories
Universidade Estadual de Londrina: wins 2/5 categories
Universidade Federal de Ouro Preto: wins 0/5 categories
Pará State University - UEPA: wins 1/5 categories
Federal Rural University of the Amazon: wins 0/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Administration
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: Accounting and Economics
Best programme: Animal and Environmental Biology
Best programme: Food Science and Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.23
4.67
Win
4.40
4.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.32
4.50
4.70
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Professors
4.38
5.00
4.60
5.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
4.43
4.25
4.60
5.00
Win
2.00
4.00
Not rated
Student life
4.26
5.00
3.90
5.00
4.00
3.50
Not rated
Value
4.10
4.75
Win
3.90
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.71
4.33
3.00
4.50
Win
3.00
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Global perspective and international exposure
  • +Practical, real-world business application
  • +Strong academic programs and skill development
  • +Excellent professors and academic programs
  • +Welcoming campus environment and natural setting
  • +Diverse student body and unique cultural encounters
  • +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
  • +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
  • +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
  • +Inclusive and diverse student community
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +High-quality and relevant academic programs
  • +Excellent faculty and academic reputation
  • +Good research and outreach programs
  • +Excellent teaching and available professors
  • +Modern, comfortable facilities and good leisure areas
  • +Engaging student events and activities

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause disorganization and communication problems.
  • -Teaching quality is poor, with faculty lacking student support and focus on profit.
  • -Exams and results are poorly managed, impacting student progression.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment detract from the learning experience.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
  • -Administrative and management issues disrupt student experience.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a major concern.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of student support are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary frustration.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and poor management communication create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Uninspiring teaching methods and an irrelevant curriculum dampen engagement.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Examining the provided university ratings reveals a generally positive student experience, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area, achieving a score of 4.43. Professors and Location also received high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest aspect, scoring 3.71, suggesting an area for potential improvement. The remaining categories, including Facilities, Student Life, and Value, fall within a solid range, indicating a good overall offering.

Overall, the university receives strong marks, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Student Life**, both scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Value are also highly rated at 4.67 and 4.75 respectively. The weakest area, though still positive, is **Internationality** at 4.25, with Accomodation also slightly lower at 4.33.

This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.

This institution garners impressive scores across several key areas. It shines with perfect marks for its professors and student life, and boasts high ratings in internationality, facilities, location, and accommodation. The sole area receiving a comparatively lower score, though still strong, is its overall value.

Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance, with notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, all receiving a high rating of 4. Conversely, **Internationality** stands out as a weaker area, scoring a 2. The **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are rated moderately at 3.

This institution demonstrates a strong profile, with excellent ratings in **Location (5)** and solid scores across Facilities, Professors, Accommodation, and Internationality, all at a 4. Student Life is its comparatively weakest area, scoring a 3.5. Overall, the university offers good value with a positive assessment in most key aspects.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of reviews are positive, praising the international environment, practical skills, and global opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and program organization.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praise the excellent professors, welcoming environment, and the university's integration with nature. The multi-campus structure and variety of courses are also highlighted.

Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students highlighted inclusive learning environments and supportive faculty. Excellent infrastructure and a relevant curriculum were also noted.

This university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being favorable. Students praise the faculty and research programs, though some mention uneven resource allocation and infrastructure issues.

The university receives excellent feedback, with ~100% positive reviews averaging 5/5. Students praise the teaching, facilities, and availability of professors. Some minor points of dissatisfaction were noted regarding chairs and specific events.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
60%
0%
0%
100%
0%
4★
41%
0%
40%
100%
100%
0%
0%
3★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close