SKEMA Business School vs Federal University of Santa Catarina - UFSC vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Ironhack vs Ecole Intuit Lab
Side-by-side comparison from 157 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong international exposure and campus network
- +Practical, up-to-date curriculum with business application
- +Valuable career support and alumni network
- +Highly skilled and approachable faculty.
- +Strong academic foundation and enriching curriculum.
- +Excellent campus structure and practical learning opportunities.
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
Nothing to show
- +Well-structured, relevant courses and dedicated, qualified professors
- +Vibrant community with numerous extracurricular and entrepreneurial opportunities
- +Strong career preparation and job market relevance
- +Excellent campus and facilities, particularly for design studies
- +Comfortable and well-equipped learning spaces
- +High-quality academic programs
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt academic progress.
- -Poor communication and guidance hinder student career goals.
- -Concerns exist regarding faculty conduct and focus on profit over education.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities & resources
- -Lack of clear communication & support
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently mentioned.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring concern.
- -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
This institution shows impressive strengths in its academic and international components, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality scoring 4.37. Location and Facilities are also well-regarded, both above 4.20. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.57, significantly lower than other categories. Student Life and Value are rated moderately, around 4.10 and 4.04 respectively.
This institution excels in student life, boasting a near-perfect score of 4.9, and also receives excellent feedback for its location and value. Conversely, accommodation presents the most significant challenge, with a substantially lower rating. Ratings for facilities, professors, and internationality fall within a solid, mid-range.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
This institution garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas. Its location, student life, internationality, and perceived value are all rated a perfect 5. Professors and facilities also receive strong scores of 4. The only notable weakness lies in accommodation, which received a rating of 0.
This institution excels in its physical environment and academic offerings, reflected in strong ratings for facilities and professors. Location also received a favorable score. However, student life and accommodation fall into the mid-range. The university's weakest points appear to be its international inclusivity and perceived value, both scoring at the lower end of the spectrum.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90%), highlighting great faculty, strong international opportunities, and practical curriculum beneficial for careers. A small percentage (~3%) reported issues with management, communication, and program organization.
All 10 reviews are positive, averaging 4.8 stars. Students praise highly skilled faculty, a stimulating learning environment, and a strong academic foundation. The campus structure is also noted as aesthetically pleasing and functional.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nothing to show
With a single review, the university receives a perfect 5/5 rating. The feedback highlights excellent classes, strong entrepreneurial encouragement, and a vibrant student community. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a single review, the university receives a 4/5 average rating. The feedback highlights a positive campus experience, particularly noting excellent design studies and comfortable, well-equipped classrooms. No negative feedback was reported.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
