SKEMA Business School vs Middlesex University - MDX vs Hult International Business School vs Amity University Dubai vs Ascencia Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 569 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: TETR College of Business (4.50)
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Middlesex University - MDX: wins 0/7 categories
Hult International Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Amity University Dubai: wins 0/7 categories
Ascencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Heriot-Watt University Dubai: wins 0/7 categories
TETR College of Business: wins 6/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
163 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
65 reviews
×
Best programme: International Business
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
3.80
Read more reviews
112 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Business Administration
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
4.20
Read more reviews
43 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
New York City, United States
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Management & Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.23
4.25
4.07
4.18
3.20
4.31
4.40
Win
Location
4.32
4.26
4.52
3.92
4.20
4.41
4.60
Win
Professors
4.37
4.27
4.41
3.95
4.20
4.16
4.50
Win
Internationality
4.43
4.25
4.71
Win
3.86
3.80
4.19
4.67
Student life
4.25
4.20
4.13
3.86
2.80
4.21
4.60
Win
Value
4.09
4.08
4.08
3.63
4.00
4.05
4.50
Win
Accommodation
3.70
3.78
3.21
3.68
3.00
3.40
4.50
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical skills and real-world business application
  • +International environment and diverse experiences
  • +Career development and professional growth
  • +Supportive, passionate, and approachable staff.
  • +Practical, relevant courses with real-world application.
  • +Positive, friendly campus atmosphere and strong sense of community.
  • +Strong career services and networking opportunities
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with experienced faculty
  • +Diverse international environment and global alumni network
  • +Supportive faculty and staff
  • +Holistic development and practical experience
  • +Engaging campus life and facilities
  • +Approachable and knowledgeable lecturers, with practical and theoretical knowledge.
  • +Supportive learning environment and engaging discussions with diverse peers.
  • +Easy access to materials and responsive faculty.
  • +Expert and approachable faculty.
  • +Well-structured, relevant programs with practical focus.
  • +Supportive environment and excellent facilities.
  • +Practical, real-world business experience and skill development.
  • +Unique global mobility and diverse cultural immersion opportunities.
  • +Valuable industry connections and strong peer networking.
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Poor communication and guidance
  • -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Facility quality and professor standards are inconsistent.
  • -Admission standards are perceived as too low.
  • -Poor communication, delays, and unprofessional staff lead to a frustrating experience.
  • -Lack of practical learning opportunities, such as events and field trips, is a significant drawback.
  • -The quality of teaching and faculty experience does not justify the high fees.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management staff.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, including technology.
  • -Lack of relevant curriculum and insufficient career preparation.
  • -Irrelevant or unhelpful degree programs.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear or lacking.
Rating summary
What students say

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.

This university demonstrates a strong performance across most surveyed aspects, with professors, internationality, location, and facilities all receiving high marks, averaging above 4.2. Student life and value also score well. The weakest area, however, is accommodation, which stands at a notably lower rating.

This university garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality** (4.77) and **Location** (4.58). Professors also receive high marks at 4.47. Facilities, Student Life, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, indicating a potential area for improvement.

Facilities stand out as the strongest area, earning a high rating. Conversely, Value and Accomodation received the lowest scores among the assessed categories. Student Life and Internationality also performed well, indicating positive student experiences. Professors and Location are rated moderately, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects of the university experience.

The university demonstrates significant strengths in its **Professors** and **Location**, both scoring 4.2. **Value** also received a high rating of 4. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the weakest area with a score of 2.8. Other categories like Facilities, Accomodation, and Internationality fall within the mid-range, suggesting areas for potential improvement.

This institution garners strong positive feedback, particularly in its location (4.41), which stands out as its highest-rated aspect. Facilities also receive high marks (4.31). However, accommodation presents a notable area for improvement, scoring the lowest at 3.4. Other categories like professors, student life, and internationality are all rated well above average, with value also being a positive indicator.

This institution demonstrates a consistently strong performance across key areas. It excels particularly in **Internationality**, **Student Life**, and **Location**, all receiving top marks. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation** also score highly. The **Value** proposition is well-regarded. While all ratings are impressive, the slight difference in scores suggests that the unique global atmosphere, vibrant campus experience, and convenient setting are standout features.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.

With ~89% positive reviews and an average 4.25/5 rating, students highlight a friendly campus vibe, engaging events, and supportive, knowledgeable staff. Some mention practical, industry-relevant courses and good group project opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

Approximately 95.4% of 65 reviews are positive, highlighting networking, job opportunities, practical learning, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with staff competence and course materials.

With an average rating of 3.8/5, ~74% of 112 reviews are positive, highlighting approachable faculty and growth opportunities. A small ~7% of feedback noted issues like unprofessionalism and communication delays.

With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting exceptional education, supportive faculty, and a rewarding learning experience. Convenience with materials and approachable lecturers are frequently praised. No negative reviews were provided.

Approximately 97.7% of 43 reviews are positive, highlighting inspiring expert professors, a nurturing campus environment, and enriching academic and personal growth. A small percentage of feedback noted some modules felt outdated and a need for campus expansion.

Most student reviews are highly positive, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars and an average of 4.5/5. Recurring themes include brilliant concepts, learning by doing, and valuable real-world business experience. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
36%
52%
27%
40%
33%
67%
4★
41%
53%
29%
36%
40%
60%
17%
3★
7%
11%
14%
30%
20%
5%
17%
2★
1%
0%
2%
5%
0%
2%
0%
1★
1%
0%
3%
2%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

teachers

most teachers are very patient when helping and explaining to student with questions, the time table planning is not great, responsible team is only accepting online request which the reply was always unable to make changes(except health related issues )

DIVERSITY

One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.

Aerospace Engineering

Amity University's Aerospace Engineering bachelor's program offers a comprehensive blend of theoretical knowledge and practical exposure in the field of aviation and aerospace technology. The curriculum is well-structured, covering essential subjects such as aerodynamics, aircraft propulsion, avionics, and space technology. The faculty members are generally supportive and knowledgeable, although some students have noted variations in teaching quality across different courses. The university's infrastructure includes laboratories and research facilities that facilitate learning and experimentation. On the downside, there have been occasional concerns about administrative processes and campus amenities, which could be improved to enhance overall student experience. Another downside is that the university does not provide any form of placements. Additionally, while the program covers a broad spectrum of topics, some students feel that certain specialized areas could be explored in greater depth. In conclusion, Amity University's Aerospace Engineering program provides a solid foundation for students aspiring to enter the aerospace industry. With its practical approach and decent faculty support. Prospective students should consider visiting the campus and researching recent student feedback to make an informed decision about joining the program.

Personal university Review

I must admit at first it was a bit hard and confusing, having good lecturers helped a lot with my studying journey and I was able to contact the after the lecture. Accessing the materials and student portal was easy, convenient and up to date. Very happy with my experience.

Nothing to show

Loving it here!

Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close