Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas vs Cag University vs Universidad Nacional de Concepción - UNC vs Alliance Manchester Business School vs Estonian Business School - EBS

Side-by-side comparison from 36 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Estonian Business School - EBS (4.70)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas: wins 4/7 categories
Cag University: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad Nacional de Concepción - UNC: wins 0/7 categories
Alliance Manchester Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Estonian Business School - EBS: wins 2/7 categories
University of Pernambuco - UPE: wins 0/7 categories
Belarusian State University - BSU: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Economics
Adana, Turkey
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Manchester, The United Kingdom
4.10
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: International Management
Best programme: International Business Administration
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.50
3.98
Not rated
3.50
Location
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
4.59
4.95
Win
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
3.93
4.67
Win
Not rated
3.00
Internationality
4.17
Not rated
Not rated
4.76
Win
4.25
Not rated
2.50
Student life
4.40
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.34
4.17
Not rated
3.50
Value
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.08
4.40
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
4.20
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.83
2.42
Not rated
2.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Strong market preparation and multicultural insights
  • +Good infrastructure and organized institution

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Expert, passionate instructors and well-structured, relevant courses.
  • +Real-world experience through consulting projects.
  • +Strong student support and career preparation resources.
  • +Practical, skill-focused academics and helpful professors
  • +Value for money and flexibility for combining study with work
  • +Internationality and diverse academic and career opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Overcrowded and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of communication from administration and disorganized management.
  • -Limited course offerings and outdated curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Outdated curriculum and irrelevant course content
  • -Inadequate facilities and poor infrastructure
  • -Insufficient teaching time due to project focus
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured by many students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution scores particularly well in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. **Professors**, **location**, and **value** also stand out with strong marks of 4.5. The **student life** is rated positively at 4.4. Among the surveyed areas, **internationality** at 4.17 and **accommodation** at 4.2 received the lowest, though still respectable, scores.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The university garners exceptional ratings for its Internationality (4.76) and Location (4.59), indicating strengths in these aspects. Facilities also received a high score (4.50). Conversely, Accomodation (3.83) and Professors (3.93) received the lowest scores, suggesting these are areas for potential improvement. Student Life (4.34) and Value (4.08) fall in the middle range.

This institution receives particularly high marks for its Location, scoring an impressive 4.95, and Professors, rated at 4.67. Students also appreciate the Internationality and Value, with scores of 4.25 and 4.4 respectively. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, with a rating of 2.42, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Facilities and Student Life also received solid, though not exceptional, scores.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~71% of feedback is positive, praising excellent professors, good infrastructure, and comprehensive programs. A small portion of feedback noted minor imperfections in technological features and graduation program structure.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable instructors, relevant coursework, and career support. A small portion of feedback points to issues with program structure and facilities.

All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students praise the excellent academics and helpful professors, noting practical learning and international focus.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
57%
0%
0%
52%
67%
0%
0%
4★
14%
0%
0%
24%
33%
0%
0%
3★
29%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
5%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close