Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas vs SKEMA Business School vs Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS vs Petrópolis Faculty of Medicine vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 180 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong market preparation and multicultural insights
- +Good infrastructure and organized institution
- +International focus and diverse campus experiences
- +Practical, industry-relevant curriculum and career support
- +Strong community with great classmates and alumni network
- +Experienced professors with practical application
- +Accessible and diverse learning opportunities
- +Quality education meeting student expectations
- +Approachable and qualified faculty
- +Diverse project and internship opportunities
- +Beautiful campus environment
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
Nothing to show
- +High-quality, concise programs
- +Relevant and up-to-date content
- +Strong foundational direction
- -Overcrowded and outdated facilities.
- -Lack of communication from administration and disorganized management.
- -Limited course offerings and outdated curriculum.
- -Administrative and management issues create poor student experience.
- -Ineffective communication and guidance hinder career development.
- -Faculty and program organization are disappointing and overly focused on profit.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Inconsistent or poor quality of teaching and curriculum are common complaints.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and a lack of support create frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -The curriculum lacks practical application and relevance to current industry needs.
This institution scores particularly well in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. **Professors**, **location**, and **value** also stand out with strong marks of 4.5. The **student life** is rated positively at 4.4. Among the surveyed areas, **internationality** at 4.17 and **accommodation** at 4.2 received the lowest, though still respectable, scores.
Across a range of metrics, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **professors** (4.41) and **internationality** (4.36). Facilities and location also received favorable scores, both above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating a generally positive experience. The weakest area is **accommodation**, which stands at 3.56, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.
This university receives its highest marks for Professors (4.32) and Value (4.25). Location (4.08) and Student Life (4.00) also scored well. Conversely, Accomodation (3.04) and Internationality (3.36) represent the weakest areas, with Facilities (3.58) falling in the middle. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in academic quality and financial benefit, while improvements may be considered in student living arrangements and global engagement.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, achieving a perfect score. Its **facilities**, **professors**, and **student life** also receive solid marks, all rated at 4. A significant area for improvement, however, is **accommodation**, which received a considerably lower rating. **Internationality** and **value** present moderate scores, suggesting room for growth in these aspects.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Nothing to show
With a generally moderate overall performance, the university's strengths lie in its **Professors**, receiving a commendable rating of 4. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** stand out as weaker areas, both rated at 2. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value all received a score of 3, indicating a more consistent, middle-ground performance in these aspects.
With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~71% of feedback is positive, praising excellent professors, good infrastructure, and comprehensive programs. A small portion of feedback noted minor imperfections in technological features and graduation program structure.
The vast majority (~97%) of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and strong alumni networks. A small percentage (~3%) express concerns about management, communication, and organization.
Students highly recommend this university, with ~93% of feedback being positive. Recurring themes include dedicated, practical professors and valuable learning opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~7%) mentions infrastructure needing maintenance.
With two positive reviews and an average rating of 4/5, feedback highlights numerous project opportunities and approachable, qualified professors. Students also appreciate early internships.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Nothing to show
This university garners strong positive feedback, with its ~100% of positive reviews leading to an average rating of 4/5. Reviews highlight well-regarded programs, though some suggest a need for updated content in areas like AI.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
