Aalto University vs Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs LAB University of Applied Sciences - LAB vs University of Turku
Side-by-side comparison from 89 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Interdisciplinary studies and cross-major flexibility
- +Independent learning and hands-on, practical experiences
- +Strong community support and active student life
- +Strong sense of community and support
- +Excellent teaching and learning atmosphere
- +Welcoming international environment and good facilities
- +Dedicated, supportive, and passionate faculty
- +Well-organized, modern campus and facilities
- +Strong industry connections and practical, future-focused education
- +Supportive environment for idea development and learning
- +Good facilities and professional support for studies and career goals
- +Flexible study options and access to technology
- +Approachable professors & strong academic programs
- +Welcoming city & positive student community
- +Good accommodation & proximity to campus
Nothing to show
- +Supportive professors and excellent learning environment
- +Practical, project-based, and industry-oriented coursework
- +Strong research focus and modern facilities
- -Lack of responsiveness and clarity from administration.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
- -Insufficient academic support and resources.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and limited course offerings disappoint students.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and disorganized management plague student experiences.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities create a frustrating learning environment.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff leads to student dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues create frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are consistently criticized.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly delivered by instructors.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a problem.
Nothing to show
- -Inefficient administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Communication breakdowns and a perceived lack of support from faculty create a negative environment.
This institution exhibits a strong overall performance, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, which received the highest rating. **Student Life** and **Internationality** also scored very well. The **Location** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, though it still falls within a generally positive range. The university demonstrates a commendable balance across its assessed aspects.
The university scores well across multiple aspects, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a rating of 4.33. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also rated highly at 4.17. The **Facilities** represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, followed by **Value** at 3.67. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.
This institution garners exceptional scores, with Professors receiving the highest marks at 4.92 and Facilities a very close second at 4.8. Student Life and Location also scored highly, both above 4.5. The weakest area, though still strong, is Accomodation with a rating of 4.44. Internationality and Value are tied for the second-highest scores.
Across several key areas, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths. Facilities stand out with an impressive 4.8 rating. Student life and internationality also score highly at 4.2, supported by solid accommodation at 4.4 and good overall value (4.0). The primary area for improvement appears to be professors, receiving the lowest rating at 3.6. Location also registers a moderate score of 3.8.
Overall, this university garners strong ratings across several key areas. Facilities and professors are particularly well-regarded, both receiving 4.25. Internationality is also a positive, scoring a 4. Value for money is also strong at 4.125. The weakest areas appear to be student life (3.71) and location and accommodation, both rated at 3.875.
Nothing to show
With a robust average score of 4.1, the university demonstrates particular strengths in its **Professors** (4.6) and **Facilities** (4.4). Areas receiving slightly lower, though still solid, marks include **Location** and **Internationality**, both at 3.8. Student life and accommodation are well-regarded, scoring 4.2 respectively, with overall value sitting at a respectable 4.
The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) with an average rating of 4.44/5. Recurring themes highlight the value of interdisciplinary studies, independent learning, and strong community support.
Reviews indicate a strong sense of community and helpful staff, with ~74% of feedback being positive. Some suggestions for improvement include better funding for facilities and further development of international programs.
With a 4.89/5 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight great professors, international focus, and excellent organization. Positive themes include modern facilities and strong industry connections.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive. Students praise learning opportunities, valuable knowledge, and practical skills. Facilities and equipment, including 3D printers and design software, are highlighted.
All 8 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students praise well-structured programs, approachable professors, and a strong sense of community. The city of Turku is also frequently mentioned as a positive aspect.
Nothing to show
Students highly recommend LUT University, highlighting supportive professors, modern facilities, and a strong research/sustainability focus. ~80% of feedback is positive, praising practical coursework and a calm academic environment. A small amount of feedback noted limited job support for international students.
I graduated from Aalto University's School of Business, majoring in Marketing, and I'd genuinely recommend it. What made the biggest difference for me, though, was the freedom to take courses outside my own major. I ended up mixing in some technology and design courses with my marketing courses, and that has turned out to be one of the most useful parts of my degree.
Nothing to show
Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.
LAB has one of the most modern, smart and inclusive university facilities in Europe. The campus houses a diverse set of meeting rooms, working spaces that are professionally suitable for students of every faculty. The nursing students have got impressively updated equipment and labs, and so do the people of Design Institute, Engineering, and Business. The facility encourages learning, but it also puts an emphasis on relaxing and maintaining balance. LAB has built an exercise point, along with equipping billiard table, mini basketball game, and 2 ping pong tables indoor. Also, the campus is open 24/7, accessible always with a student or staff card. The university also owns a holistic range of academic journals, books, articles in its physical and digital libraries. Making a library card, loaning and returning a book is as easy as ever. The lecturers for courses taught in English could be better, in my opinion. They are very helpful and responsive, but at times, lectures are somewhat boring.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
From my perspective, my experience at LUT University has been positive overall. I especially liked the strong focus on project-based and practical coursework, which helped me gain real-world skills. The academic environment is calm and research-oriented. However, I felt that the university is not very supportive when it comes to helping international students find jobs. Overall, I would recommend it to students who are independent and proactive.
