Delft University of Technology - TU Delft vs Doncaster College vs Lebanese University vs University of Liberia - UL vs Stella Maris Polytechnic University - SMPU
Side-by-side comparison from 127 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engineering focus and advanced technical content
- +Practical learning approach and creative expression
- +Supportive community and inspiring peers/lecturers
Nothing to show
- +Quality education and highly qualified teachers
- +Enriched social and cultural experiences
- +Affordable tuition fees
- +Strong academic foundation & critical thinking skills
- +Dedicated and supportive professors
- +Invaluable career preparation
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Caring and exceptional professors
- +Positive life impact and decisions
- +Strong post-conflict reconstruction environment
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of pedagogical understanding.
- -Unhelpful and pushy academic and administrative staff.
- -Students feel ignored and not supported in their learning.
Nothing to show
- -Academic rigor and workload are overwhelming and poorly managed.
- -Poor quality of teaching across multiple subjects.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative support.
- -Overcrowded classes and limited personalized attention.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant problem.
- -Lack of support and communication from staff is a common complaint.
This institution garners impressive scores in several key areas, with Facilities and Internationality standing out as particularly strong at over 4.4. Location and Value also receive high marks, reflecting positively on the student experience. Conversely, Accomodation presents a significant area for improvement, scoring considerably lower than other categories. Student Life, while decent, also falls slightly behind the higher-rated aspects.
Nothing to show
Across various aspects, this institution garners solid reviews, with professors and value for money standing out as significant strengths. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, suggesting an area that could benefit from improvement. Student life and facilities also registered moderately, while location and internationality received mid-range ratings.
This institution presents a mixed but generally average profile. Its strongest areas include Professors, Student Life, and Internationality, all scoring a respectable 3 or 3.5. Facilities and Value also landed at a solid 3. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as a significant weakness with a low rating of 1.5, and Location also falls below the average at 2.5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution excels with top marks in **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life**, indicating a vibrant and well-supported academic and social environment. Accommodation and Internationality also received strong scores. While **Facilities** were rated positively, they represent the lowest-scoring area, suggesting room for enhancement in that regard. Overall, the university offers excellent value.
The university receives strong positive feedback, with ~90% of reviews praising learning materials, practical approaches, and supportive communities. A small minority (~3%) express concerns about specific program content and pedagogical approaches.
Nothing to show
With a 3.79/5 average, ~74% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, quality education, and affordability. A small portion (~7%) of feedback mentions challenges like high credit loads and inconsistent teaching quality.
With one positive review, this university is largely well-regarded. Students highlight a solid academic foundation and dedicated professors. Negative feedback is minimal, representing approximately 0% of the feedback.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With one review, the average rating is a perfect 5/5. The feedback highlights exceptional professors who truly cared, indicating highly positive sentiment.
Hello, [Skip to "Conclusion" for a brief summary] In this post, I’ll share my experience with the TU Delft Industrial Design Engineering bachelor's program as a graduate, so that future students can make a more informed decision. I chose this bachelor’s program because I expected it to involve a lot of engineering and technical content, which would help me understand how most products are made, think production techniques, appropriate material use, product manufacturing, and the integration of technology and mathematics that’s common in modern products. However, I ended up learning very little about these topics during my time in the program. The study mainly consisted of filling out Miro (an online platform) templates, coming up with systems, and focusing on sustainability (which, to be fair, isn't necessarily a bad thing). But I never felt like I was learning anything new; I was just repeatedly filling in the same kinds of templates for the DP/PO (Design Project/Project Organisatie) courses throughout the full three years. Each year, you follow two DP/PO courses. The only courses I personally found useful in terms of learning product design were the drawing classes and a first-year SolidWorks course (3D modeling). Normally, I find math courses boring and difficult, but thanks to this bachelor’s, I actually really enjoyed the two math/physics courses (Product Dynamics and Product Statics). For the first time in a while, I felt like I was doing something meaningful, had to put in effort, and was actually learning something new. Another thing I really disliked about this program is how “school-like” it’s structured. You're required to be on campus every day from 8:45 AM to 5:30 PM, working in a so-called “studio” (classroom) with your fellow students, supposedly to learn from each other. This might work for some people, but for me (and I think for others too), it didn’t. I can’t focus well in noisy, crowded spaces, and I rarely connected with my fellow students. The social atmosphere was always centered around the typical student lifestyle (like student associations), and I wasn’t involved in that kind of life at all. The strict scheduling was probably the worst part. It made me feel like I was still in high school, instead of being a responsible adult who should be allowed to structure their own time. In many courses, you’re also penalized if you’re absent or not actively participating in class. Your final grade often drops as a result, especially since there’s always a rubric item about “communication and presence” of the student. Now on to a very different, but important point I want to share. I’m a guy with a Turkish background/ethnicity. This has, in my experience, had a significant impact on how I was treated and assessed during my studies. Because of my appearance, I stood out a lot in this predominantly Dutch/white bachelor’s program. I was one of the very few students with a migration background (I could count them on one hand, out of 300+ students in my year). In group projects and reports, I often felt like I wasn’t taken seriously by the lecturers. I never really felt welcome at the faculty or in the studios, I often felt like an outsider. The assessments for reports/projects were always subjective. Yes, there’s a so-called “rubric,” but it’s completely vague and can be interpreted in many ways, so you never know whether you’ve actually met the expectations. In my opinion, grading was purely based on the teacher’s personal opinion, and this was even confirmed by one of the teachers, who admitted the rubrics were “kind of nonsense” and that they just decide the grade based on how they feel about you and your work. As a result, I rarely received high marks for assignments, even though I consistently scored 8s on exams, which are graded objectively. I even went to the study advisor once because I had been unfairly graded. But even the study advisor couldn’t care less. He flat-out said “NO” to my face when I expressed my concerns emotionally. I didn’t even get a fake “that’s unfortunate” or a polite smile. That showed me that basic empathy is not standard for everyone. In my view, these are the bare minimum responses you’d expect when a student is struggling. That’s why I want to clearly state in this post that, in my experience, there’s a significant amount of racism within the IDE bachelor’s program at TU Delft. You might be wondering, after reading all this, “Why didn’t you just quit the program?” I started this program during the COVID outbreak, which meant my entire first year was online (with mandatory Zoom attendance from 8:45 AM to 5:30 PM). So at first, I thought my negative experience was due to the pandemic. When I finally got to campus in my second year, I realized too late that this program just wasn’t the right fit for me. But I’m someone who always sees things through and doesn’t quit halfway. Since I had already completed more than a year, I was determined to finish. Conclusion All in all, I strongly advise against choosing this bachelor’s program if your goal is to pursue a real engineering-focused, challenging, and educational degree, because IDE at TU Delft is certainly not that. To future students with a migrant background: only consider this program if you’re planning to do it with a friend. You’re unlikely to make many friends here, and you’ll probably end up feeling lonely and like an outsider, especially if your values or cultural background differ from the average “IDE” student. I’m now studying something else at a different university, and I’m much happier. I’m achieving great results and feel appreciated. Just to be clear: my review is not about TU Delft as a whole, it is specifically about the Industrial Design Engineering bachelor’s program. If you have any questions after reading my “mini-book,” feel free to send me a private message on Reddit or leave a comment under this post. I’m happy to help you make a better-informed study decision, something I, unfortunately, didn’t have.
Nothing to show
the study program is heavy and international ! degree recognized worldwide! logistically it is conquered by politics. too many strikes from the Dr. due to financial issue and bad salaries. Faculties not well equipped due to bad management.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show