Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP vs Universitat de les Illes Balears vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH vs Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia - UCAM vs Escola d’Art i Superior de Disseny de les Illes Balears

Side-by-side comparison from 95 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Schiller International University (4.60)
Universidad CEU San Pablo - CEU USP: wins 0/7 categories
Universitat de les Illes Balears: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Católica San Antonio de Murcia - UCAM: wins 0/7 categories
Escola d’Art i Superior de Disseny de les Illes Balears: wins 2/7 categories
Schiller International University: wins 2/7 categories
TETR College of Business: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: Medicine
Best programme: Communication
Best programme: Interior Design
Tampa, Florida, United States
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: BA International Relations and Diplomacy
New York City, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Management & Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
3.83
4.00
4.66
Win
3.50
4.00
3.92
4.33
Location
3.79
3.80
3.87
4.00
5.00
Win
4.93
4.67
Professors
3.90
3.60
4.64
4.33
4.00
4.64
Win
4.25
Internationality
3.44
3.00
4.71
3.83
3.00
4.93
Win
4.50
Student life
3.76
3.60
4.58
4.17
5.00
Win
4.15
4.33
Value
3.65
3.60
4.61
Win
3.83
4.00
4.29
4.25
Accommodation
3.44
2.80
4.08
3.83
4.00
3.62
4.50
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Welcoming people and active campus life
  • +Comprehensive and complementary programmes
  • +Practical learning opportunities and real-world application
  • +Welcoming campus atmosphere and supportive professors
  • +Positive student interactions and approachable staff
  • +High-quality teaching and specialized programs
  • +Real-world work experience and strong career support.
  • +Excellent professors and a supportive, modern learning environment.
  • +International student community and enriching social connections.
  • +Supportive and attentive faculty
  • +High-quality, well-organized programs
  • +Diverse and international community
  • +Friendly, professional, and experienced teachers
  • +Valuable extracurricular activities and networking opportunities
  • +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
  • +Opportunities for personal and career growth
  • +Supportive and organized academic environment
  • +Experiential learning and business creation
  • +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
  • +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
Cons
  • -Poor professor English proficiency and lack of care for international students.
  • -Disorganization and a lack of a cohesive program structure.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a constant problem.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are frequently perceived as ineffective or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are frequently criticized.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are often found to be lacking.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -A lack of engaging or relevant course content is frequently criticized.
  • -Limited extracurriculars and career opportunities.
  • -Poor quality of facilities and overall environment.
  • -Lack of academic rigor and student engagement.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners strong marks in academics and overall experience, with Professors receiving the highest rating at approximately 3.9 and Facilities closely following at 3.83. Student Life and Location also score well. Areas for potential improvement lie in Accomodation and Internationality, both rated at 3.44, indicating these aspects may not meet the same high standards as other surveyed categories.

A balanced profile emerges from these university ratings, with the strongest area being its facilities, scoring a solid 4. Performance is also notable in professors, location, and student life, all receiving 3.6. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest point, with a score of 2.8. Internationality and value for money are rated moderately, at 3.

An excellent overall performance is indicated by these university ratings. The institution excels particularly in **Internationality**, boasting a high score of 4.71. Facilities and Professors also received strong marks. The weakest area, by comparison, is **Location**, with a score of 3.87, suggesting this may be a point of consideration.

Reviewing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The strongest area for the institution is clearly its professors, who received an excellent rating. Students also appear to be well-served by the location and student life. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value for money.

This institution garners strong marks, particularly excelling in its desirable **Location** and vibrant **Student Life**, both receiving perfect scores. **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** are also well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The primary area for potential improvement lies in **Internationality**, which received a comparatively lower rating of 3.

The university exhibits exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, both scoring a near-perfect 4.93. Professors also receive high marks at 4.64, complemented by strong student life (4.15) and value (4.29). The weakest areas are facilities, rated at 3.92, and accommodation, which received a 3.62.

This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~74% positive feedback and an average rating of 3.94/5, students highlight positive interactions and campus life. A small percentage (~6%) express disappointment, citing low academic rigor and English proficiency concerns.

With an average rating of 3.5/5 from 6 reviews, feedback is largely positive (~100% positive). Recurring themes include a friendly campus atmosphere, approachable professors, and good faculty.

With an average rating of 4.43/5, ~96% of 23 reviews are positive. Students highlight rewarding academic and personal development, practical work experience, and an international environment. There is no negative feedback recorded.

With a 4.18 average rating from 11 reviews, students praise UCAM's high-level teaching, supportive faculty, and enriching academic and international environments. No negative feedback was provided.

With one review, the average rating is 4 out of 5. Positive feedback highlights friendly, professional teachers and engaging extracurricular activities. No negative feedback was reported.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with 13 out of 14 (93%) giving high ratings. Students praise the diverse educators and peer networks, cultural exposure, and opportunities for personal and academic growth. A small percentage of feedback (around 7%) mentions a lack of extracurricular activities and internship availability for earlier years.

With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.

Rating distribution
5★
29%
0%
48%
27%
0%
71%
60%
4★
46%
50%
48%
64%
100%
21%
20%
3★
20%
50%
4%
9%
0%
0%
20%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
7%
0%
1★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Teachers and campus

I'm a physoterapiy student at the University of the Balearic Islands. I recently finished the second year, so I can give my opinion about my teachers and the structure of my campus. In this two years I had some perfect teachers. Their are teachers of Biomechanic, Anatomy and fisiology of the muscle and bone system, palpatory anatomy and image diagnostic, Valoration in physoterapy and Kinesiotherapy. In terms of my campus, there are 5 classes that have stretchers, but not all of them are regulable. Also the students have the possibility to go to the Campus sport, paying a monthly fee or another possibilities (it's very cheap and have a lot of installations).

Studying at CEU prepared me for the world.

Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.

Good, but worthy of improvement

The life in Murcia is simply great! A lot of tapas bars, bars, clubs etc. which are affordable for students! During the courses at UCAM, I got to know so many international people who got really good friends in the meanwhile. The only shortcoming is that several professors have difficulties to explain their ideas in English, because of the language barrier. But this does not concern every teacher. Furthermore, the teaching staff is not only about professors but about people having their own business and talking about their own experiences. All in all the education is pretty good at UCAM. But the working-life balance is even better. "Savoir-Vivre!"

Nothing to show

The cultural mix and the great atmosphere.

I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.

Loving it here!

Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close