Universidad de La Salle Bajío vs Instituto Universitario del Centro de México - UCEM vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Universidad Panamericana vs The City University of New York - CUNY
Side-by-side comparison from 63 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Continuously updated and relevant programs
- +Experienced and knowledgeable faculty
- +Supportive and growing campus environment
Nothing to show
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
- +Highly qualified professors and academic excellence
- +Strong business programs and professional connections
- +Personalized attention and strong sense of community
- +Dedicated lecturers and supportive advisors
- +Welcoming and diverse community, even online
- +Accessible resources and financial aid programs
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- -Overburdened staff and poor communication.
- -Inadequate resources and outdated facilities.
- -Unclear academic expectations and grading.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
- -Intellectualism is perceived as cultish.
- -Institutions are seen as unreliable sources of truth.
- -There's a critique of seeking purpose through complex language and power.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and equipment
- -Lack of practical experience and job preparedness
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly excelling in Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Internationality, all receiving a perfect score of 5. Value and Facilities also score highly at 4. The weakest area identified is Professors, rated at 3. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture with outstanding student-focused aspects.
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
The university is highly rated for its professors, achieving a strong 4.5. Facilities and value also score well, both at 4.33. Student life, while respectable at 3.67, and accommodation at 3.75 represent areas where ratings are somewhat lower. Internationality is rated the lowest among all categories at 3.33.
This institution receives its highest commendations for Location and Internationality, both scoring strongly. Conversely, Facilities present the weakest area. The university also performs well in Value and Professor quality. Student Life and Accomodation are rated moderately.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
With 75% positive feedback, students praise the university's updated curriculum and experienced faculty. Some suggest incorporating more current global topics and additional labs. The average rating is 3.75/5.
Nothing to show
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
University students praise academic excellence, professor quality, and modern facilities. ~92% of feedback is positive, with one reviewer expressing concerns about intellectualism.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~83%), with students highlighting dedicated lecturers, supportive systems, and engaging lessons. Some minor issues mentioned include occasional noise and malfunctioning automatic doors.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
It's the first time I study in La Salle, in my opinion I think it has a good education level. But in particular the university has to focus on the new topics of what's happening around the world not only in the past years. Could be better to have a program with actual subjects, it needs a refresh with real strategies to improve the work of everybody who Studies at La Salle Bajio.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show