Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Leiden University vs ONCAMPUS Global vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs Breda University of Applied Sciences

Side-by-side comparison from 321 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: ONCAMPUS Global (4.80)
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam: wins 0/7 categories
Leiden University: wins 0/7 categories
ONCAMPUS Global: wins 4/7 categories
Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences: wins 1/7 categories
Breda University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
NHL Stenden University of Applied Sciences: wins 1/7 categories
Avans University of Applied Sciences - ASIS: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.Sc. in Psychology
Leiden, The Netherlands
4.10
Read more reviews
80 reviews
×
Best programme: Liberal Arts
London, The United Kingdom
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
21 reviews
×
Best programme: Undergraduate Foundation Programme
Best programme: BBA (EBA) specialisation Entrepreneurship & Digital Marketing
Best programme: Creative Business
Best programme: Creative Business
Best programme: International Business Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.06
4.17
4.44
3.25
3.86
4.46
Win
4.00
Location
4.29
4.49
4.75
Win
3.71
4.00
3.97
4.50
Professors
4.31
3.97
4.76
Win
3.38
3.29
3.82
3.00
Internationality
4.46
4.03
4.62
4.88
Win
3.57
4.47
3.00
Student life
4.19
4.11
4.58
2.63
3.14
4.10
5.00
Win
Value
4.21
4.03
4.52
Win
3.38
2.71
3.99
3.50
Accommodation
3.15
3.41
4.35
Win
3.50
2.14
3.74
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Engaging and supportive professors
  • +Diverse and international student environment
  • +Balanced theory and practical application in programmes
  • +Expert professors and high academic quality
  • +Supportive environment and engaging student life
  • +Comprehensive and well-structured programs
  • +Supportive and approachable teachers
  • +Excellent student support services
  • +Convenient campus location and facilities
  • +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
  • +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
  • +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
  • +Strong industry-relevant skill development and career preparation.
  • +Supportive and professional faculty guidance.
  • +Opportunities for creativity and broad learning.
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world projects
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and strong sense of community
  • +Ample opportunities for personal growth and industry immersion
  • +Internship and study abroad opportunities
  • +Strong career prospects and networking
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources hinder learning.
  • -Unclear communication and lack of support create a negative experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
  • -Subpar educational quality and professors' lack of interest in teaching.
  • -Lack of equal opportunities and a failure to genuinely support diverse student needs.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
  • -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear career relevance and transferability of skills.
  • -Programmatic issues, including misleading international focus and language barriers.
  • -Poor communication and lack of teacher availability lead to students feeling unsupported and left to self-teach.
  • -Widespread disorganization and unclear assignments create confusion and hinder academic progress.
  • -Inconsistent feedback, or a complete lack thereof, makes it difficult for students to understand their performance and areas for improvement.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor learning resources are frequently criticized.
  • -A lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates strong performance, particularly in its **Internationality**, earning a rating of 4.46. Professors are also highly regarded at 4.31, alongside a positive showing for Location and Value. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.15.

Assessed across several key metrics, the university garners its highest marks for **Location**, receiving a strong 4.49. Facilities also score well at 4.17, closely followed by Student Life at 4.11 and a respectable 4.03 for both Internationality and Value. The area with the lowest rating is **Accomodation**, with a score of 3.41, while Professors are rated at 3.97.

This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.

A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.

Analyzing the provided ratings, the university demonstrates its strongest performance in Location, receiving a perfect score. Facilities also fare well, with a rating of 3.86. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring a low 2.14. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Value fall within a moderate range, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution scores exceptionally well in Facilities and Internationality, indicating a robust environment for students and a global outlook. Student Life and Location also receive strong marks. Conversely, the areas of Professors and Accomodation present the weakest performance, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. Value for money is rated reasonably well.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its vibrant student life, earning a perfect score, and its convenient location, which is rated highly at 4.5. Conversely, areas requiring attention include the quality of professors and accommodation, both receiving a middle-of-the-road 3. Facilities and internationality also fall into this moderate range. The overall value proposition sits at a respectable 3.5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a high average rating of 4.3/5 from 56 reviews, ~89% of students praise the university's multicultural environment, excellent library resources, and dedicated professors. There are no 1-2 star reviews.

With an average rating of 4.06/5, ~96% of reviews are positive, highlighting top-rated programs, engaging professors, and comprehensive student support. A small amount of negative feedback, around 3.8%, points to concerns with bureaucracy and teaching quality.

All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.

Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.

Around 57% of reviews are positive, highlighting skill development and professional support. However, about 29% of feedback points to program content not meeting expectations and limited career preparation.

Approximately 94% of reviews are positive, praising practical learning, opportunities, and a welcoming atmosphere. About 6% of reviews mention disorganization, poor communication, and lack of support.

With a 3.5/5 average rating, this university receives positive feedback (~100% of reviews) highlighting program length, internship opportunities, study abroad options, and strong career prospects. No negative feedback was provided.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
29%
76%
25%
14%
22%
0%
4★
48%
55%
24%
38%
43%
65%
50%
3★
11%
13%
0%
38%
14%
7%
50%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
14%
1%
0%
1★
0%
3%
0%
0%
14%
5%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
:)

As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.

Supportive and Self-Directed Learning

I study the International Bachelor in Psychology at Leiden University and am also part of the Honours College. Overall, my experience has been very positive. One of the standout aspects is the university’s strong emphasis on career services. There are countless workshops and events designed to help with CVs, cover letters, motivation letters, and even writing assignments for courses. It’s clear that Leiden prioritizes preparing students for life beyond university. The online learning system is also well-organized—Brightspace brings everything together. Lecture recordings, assignment details, readings, and announcements are all kept in one place, making it easy to stay on track. Professors and staff are approachable, and interaction is encouraged, which creates a comfortable and supportive academic environment. The student body is naturally diverse, and this creates an inclusive international community within the department. Outside of classes, Leiden itself is a cozy student city—you often run into people you know at cafés or walking through town, which adds a sense of belonging. However, there are a few drawbacks. The different faculties are scattered across the city, so it can be hard to meet students from outside your program. Some administrative processes, like course enrollment, are unnecessarily stressful—everyone has to register at the same time, which often overwhelms the system. Additionally, the housing crisis in the Netherlands has also hit Leiden. Most international students including myself struggle to find affordable accommodation since the university isn't able to guarantee accommodation, even in the first year. Also, there are relatively few contact hours. Whether that’s a pro or a con depends on the person. Most of the learning is self-study, and lectures or workgroups only cover a portion of the material. For me, this helped build a lot of self-discipline, but for students looking for more structured, in-person teaching, this might feel limiting. All in all, I’d recommend Leiden University to students who are self-motivated and want both academic and career development opportunities in an international environment.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

It's got positives and negatives

Very flexible in what you can choose, but the course can be very vague and push you into the marketing or film track. Other specializations don't get as many options for the graduation project. There are also some very passionate and good teachers at the school, but sometimes classes don't really follow with what you need to know for the deliverable

Creative Business

Studying Creative Business at NHL Stenden has been a great experience with a few bumps down the road. Generally speaking, I'm very glad about my choice to study here - as an international student I am surrounded by other internationals which makes me feel more welcome and comfortable; this university has provided me with numerous extracurricular opportunities, which were not only great for networking and finding like-minded connections, but also getting extremely nice and useful experience, whether it's working on a real set with professional production equipment or creating content and representing my course on social media! When it comes to the study itself, it usually is pretty confusing, as students are usually just thrown into practical projects without initial preparation and sometimes not enough guidance. However, once you get used to design-based education, you realize how exciting the assignments actually are - working with real clients, producing your own ideas and seeing them come to life, and just "creativity, creativity, creativity" everywhere. I recommend this university for those who are not afraid of teamwork, thinking outside of the box, and being independent.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close