Instituto Politécnico Nacional - IPN vs Instituto Tecnológico y de Estudios Superiores de Monterrey - ITESM vs Universidad Anáhuac vs Instituto Superior de Intérpretes y Traductores - ISIT vs Escuela Bancaria y Comercial - EBC
Side-by-side comparison from 145 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent, experienced, and dedicated instructors.
- +Relevant, industry-tailored programs for professional development.
- +Strong focus on student learning and future success.
- +High-quality teaching and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Abundant opportunities for personal growth, skill development, and extracurricular involvement
- +Prestigious reputation and valuable academic programs
- +Leadership and values development
- +Academic excellence and practical application
- +Supportive community and modern facilities
Nothing to show
- +Practical application of theory with real-world relevance
- +Career flexibility and diverse job opportunities
- +Instructors with industry experience and business acumen
Nothing to show
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent disruptions.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Unresponsive administration and poor faculty engagement.
- -Lack of support and disregard for student concerns.
- -Inadequate response to serious student safety issues.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is evident.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently cited.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and a disconnect with course material are common complaints.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
A diverse set of ratings reveals this institution excels in several key areas. The university is particularly lauded for its **Value** and **Student Life**, both receiving the highest marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents a weaker point, alongside **Facilities**, which also fall below the average. Other aspects like **Location**, **Professors**, and **Internationality** generally fall within a positive range.
Overall, the university garners strong ratings in key areas. Facilities stand out with an impressive 4.59, closely followed by Location at 4.56 and Student Life at 4.53. While professors and internationality also receive favorable scores, Accommodation emerges as the relatively weakest area, scoring 4.24. Value for money is also rated well.
This institution garners excellent scores, with accommodation standing out as its strongest area at 4.65625. Student life and value also received high marks. Professors represent the area with the lowest rating at 4.40625, though it remains a very positive score. Overall, the university demonstrates considerable strengths in most aspects evaluated.
Nothing to show
This institution receives particularly high marks for its vibrant Student Life, scoring a perfect 5. The Location and Value are also strong points, both rated at 4.5. Conversely, Internationality is the weakest area, receiving a rating of 3, with Accomodation also scoring slightly lower at 3.5. Facilities and Professors are rated solidly at 4.
Nothing to show
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
With a 4.33/5 average, university students praise dedicated and qualified teachers, well-structured courses, and excellent training. Some minor infrastructure and resource challenges were noted.
With an average rating of 4.59/5, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising great classes, professors, and personal growth opportunities. A single negative review cited program shutdowns and safety concerns.
With ~97% positive feedback and an average of 4.58/5, students praise academic excellence, leadership development, and integral personal growth programs. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
All three reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the practical application of theory, teachers' industry experience, and the broad career opportunities offered by their degrees.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nothing to show
ITESM is a college that greatly values student development in every aspect of their lives, from a deep and personal level up to the professional aspect of the University. The courses and classes have a modern way of teaching students different lessons and subjects in easy, fast and innovative ways in order to acquire as much information as possible, leaving space at the end of the career path to get a more deep and concentrated approach to the field of studies you wish to focus on. To finish it up there are hundreds of opportunities and activities to develop your personal self and your social abilities and connections; the School truly values the sense of entrepreneurship and social responsibility, among other core values, and it makes an effort to really make students feel like part of the TEC community through the years.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
