Universidade de São Paulo - USP vs Paulista University - UNIP vs Universidade Belas Artes vs Fundação Getulio Vargas - FGV vs International School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 62 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality academics and expert professors
- +Valuable networking opportunities with diverse peers
- +Excellent campus facilities and student support
- +Excellent structure and amazing teachers
- +Quality and updated teaching
- +Positive student experience and career support
- +Engaging and effective teaching
- +Supportive learning environment
- +Strong academic reputation and career prospects
- +Career development & knowledge acquisition
- +Practical subject understanding & job opportunities
- +Strong business, public admin, law, economics, and international affairs programs
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
Nothing to show
- -Lack of communication and transparency from administration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources.
- -Ineffective teaching and unengaging course content.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Inconsistent quality of teaching and learning experiences are a concern.
- -Nepotism and lack of fairness in opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues are consistently frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a significant drawback.
- -Communication problems and unclear expectations cause confusion.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates notable strengths in student life, internationality, and value, all receiving top marks. Location also scores well. However, the accommodation facilities represent the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating compared to other aspects. Facilities and professor quality are rated solidly in the mid-range.
This institution receives high marks, particularly for its Professors (4.75), Location (4.58), and Value (4.25). Student Life and Facilities also score well. Areas for improvement include Accommodation (3.92) and notably, Internationality (3.42), which is the lowest rated aspect. Overall, the university presents a solid offering with notable strengths in academic and experiential components.
This institution's strongest asset is its prime location, earning a perfect score. Conversely, facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value all received the lowest possible rating, indicating significant areas requiring improvement.
This institution shines brightly in its faculty and location, both receiving excellent scores. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded, as is its international presence and perceived value. The area with the lowest rating, however, is accommodation, which stands at a respectable but comparatively lower point.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
93% of reviews are positive, highlighting beneficial networking, great personal and professional opportunities, and amazing professors. A small amount of feedback noted some campi's infrastructure doesn't match others.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, ~79% of 14 reviews are highly positive. Students praise excellent structure, quality teaching, and sensational professors, particularly in health sciences. No negative feedback was provided.
The single review is entirely negative, rating the university 1/5. It highlights frustration and nepotism as key issues, suggesting a lack of meritocracy.
With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% positive feedback). Students praise career development, knowledge acquisition, practical understanding, and job opportunities.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nothing to show
I truly love the University of São Paulo. It’s not only the best university in Latin America, but also one of the most respected institutions in the world. What makes USP so special to me is its massive research infrastructure. The academic environment encourages curiosity, and for students who stand out, there are countless opportunities — whether in research, internships, or academic exchange. What I admire most is how knowledge is taken seriously here. Professors are highly qualified, and you’re constantly surrounded by brilliant minds. It’s a challenging space, but it pushes you to grow. However, if there’s something I think could be improved, it’s the way the institute’s funding is managed. In many cases, the needs of undergraduate students are not the top priority. It often feels like the investment is directed elsewhere, rather than towards improving the daily life and academic support for those who are just starting their journey in higher education. Still, despite its flaws, I would definitely recommend USP. It’s a place that shapes people — not only academically, but personally. If you’re willing to engage and take advantage of everything it offers, USP will open doors you never imagined.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
