Bauman Moscow State Technical University - BMSTU vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia - RUDN vs Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Bauman Moscow State Technical University - BMSTU: wins 0/2 categories
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 0/2 categories
Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia - RUDN: wins 0/2 categories
Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO: wins 2/2 categories
Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS: wins 0/2 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/2 categories
Center for Creative Leadership: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: BA Political Science
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology of Human Resources Development
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
4.14
3.80
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
5.00
4.67
4.20
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
4.00
4.33
3.80
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
3.00
4.18
4.20
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
5.00
4.10
4.50
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
5.00
4.48
4.00
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
4.00
3.99
3.20
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Robust engineering fundamentals and academic rigor.
  • +Supportive and responsive administration and faculty.
  • +Established university reputation and strong student support.
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +Engaging academics, practical skill development, and career support
  • +Vibrant, multicultural atmosphere with global connections and cultural exchange
  • +Diverse program options and research opportunities
  • +Engaging, relevant instruction from passionate, supportive faculty.
  • +Emphasis on analytical thinking and practical application of concepts.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Student-centered support and inclusivity
  • +Welcoming and understanding community
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Course content and teaching methods lack relevance and engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including allegations of corruption and biased treatment.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content can be irrelevant or not up-to-date.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners outstanding marks in several key areas, including facilities, location, and overall value, all receiving a perfect score of 5. Student life also scored highly at 5. While professors and accommodation were well-regarded with a score of 4, internationality emerged as a comparatively weaker area with a rating of 3.

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

This institution demonstrates a robust student life, scoring a 4.5, and excellent internationality and location at 4.2. However, accommodation presents the lowest score at 3.2, with facilities and professors also receiving moderate ratings of 3.8. Value is rated a solid 4.0, suggesting a generally positive experience balanced by some areas for improvement.

This institution achieves perfect scores across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a stellar 5 out of 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong and well-rounded university experience with no discernible weak points based on this rating system.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5 stars. Students praised the in-depth engineering fundamentals and knowledgeable professors, as well as responsive administration and support for student initiatives.

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

With a 4/5 average rating from 8 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students praise academic exploration, diverse cultures, and career preparation. A small portion (~12.5%) mention administrative delays and corruption allegations.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting engaging coursework, interactive instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
65%
50%
100%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
22%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
9%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
13%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Peoples’ Friendship University of Russia

RUDN provides a vibrant, multicultural atmosphere ideal for students seeking global connections. However, administrative processes (visa support, registration) can be slow and bureaucratic. The language programs ( Russian/English-taught courses) are excellent for non-native speakers. Campus facilities like libraries and dormitories are decent, though some buildings need renovation. Student clubs and events foster cultural exchange.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close