Tampere University - TUNI vs Aalto University vs Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK vs South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK vs Arcada University of Applied Sciences - UAS

Side-by-side comparison from 106 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK (4.90)
Tampere University - TUNI: wins 1/7 categories
Aalto University: wins 0/7 categories
Tampere University of Applied Sciences - TAMK: wins 0/7 categories
South-Eastern Finland University of Applied Sciences - XAMK: wins 5/7 categories
Arcada University of Applied Sciences - UAS: wins 1/7 categories
Tampere University of Technology - TUT: wins 0/7 categories
Metropolia University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Espoo, Finland
4.70
Read more reviews
36 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: BHC in Nursing
Best programme: Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.61
4.39
3.50
4.79
Win
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.00
4.06
4.33
4.50
Win
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.21
4.11
4.17
4.92
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.09
4.33
4.33
4.75
Win
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.73
Win
4.30
4.17
4.54
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.24
4.36
3.67
4.75
Win
4.67
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.19
4.24
4.00
4.42
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and supportive community
  • +Strong research and innovation focus
  • +Well-organized courses and modern facilities
  • +Rigorous, independent learning with practical, hands-on experience
  • +Active student life, community support, and multidisciplinary collaboration
  • +Flexible course options and excellent facilities
  • +Strong sense of community and support
  • +Excellent teaching and learning atmosphere
  • +Welcoming international environment and good facilities
  • +Passionate, supportive, and communicative educators
  • +Practical, career-focused programmes and real-world connections
  • +International atmosphere and flexible learning paths
  • +Practical, relevant learning and real-world projects
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable staff
  • +Modern facilities and updated resources

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Reduced teaching quality
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of support and engagement from staff is concerning.
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and limited course offerings disappoint students.
  • -Inefficient administrative processes cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from staff creates confusion.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support are prevalent concerns.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners exceptional praise for its student life and facilities, both scoring above 4.7. Professors and overall value also receive strong marks, hovering around 4.2. While location is rated a solid 4, it represents a relative weakness compared to other aspects. Accommodations and internationality are also well-regarded, though not reaching the same peak scores.

With a generally strong showing across multiple aspects, this university excels in **Facilities**, receiving a high rating of 4.39. **Internationality** and **Value** also scored well, both above 4.3. Conversely, **Location** presents the weakest area, with a rating of 4.06. The university demonstrates robust performance in student-focused categories like **Student Life** and **Accomodation**, while **Professors** also maintain a solid score.

The university scores well across multiple aspects, with **Location** and **Internationality** standing out as particularly strong areas, both receiving a rating of 4.33. **Professors** and **Student Life** are also rated highly at 4.17. The **Facilities** represent the weakest area, with a rating of 3.5, followed by **Value** at 3.67. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.

This institution earns exceptionally high marks, particularly in the **professors** category with a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **internationality** also stand out with strong ratings. Areas receiving slightly lower, though still positive, scores include **student life** and **accommodation**. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded positive profile.

This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in its **Professors**, achieving a perfect score. Facilities and Value also receive exceptionally high marks. Conversely, Accomodation is the lowest-rated category. Other aspects like Location, Student Life, and Internationality are well-regarded, indicating a generally positive student experience.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.39/5, ~85% of reviews are positive. Students praise research opportunities, approachable faculty, and excellent facilities. A small amount of feedback (~3%) noted a decline in teaching quality.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% 4-5 stars), highlighting strong academic challenges, independent learning, and active student life with multidisciplinary opportunities. A small amount of feedback (~8%) suggests courses may be too short to fully grasp topics.

Reviews indicate a strong sense of community and helpful staff, with ~74% of feedback being positive. Some suggestions for improvement include better funding for facilities and further development of international programs.

All 26 reviews are positive, averaging 4.88/5. Students praise practical, student-centered education, supportive teachers, and innovation. A minor concern was difficulty securing clinical practice due to language skills.

All 100% of reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight a sense of belonging, welcoming staff, practical learning, and modern facilities. Some mention concern about course scheduling.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
58%
56%
29%
88%
25%
0%
0%
4★
27%
39%
14%
12%
75%
0%
0%
3★
12%
11%
57%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Student

Aalto University is honestly such an amazing place. The campus is right in the middle of nature, with woods and water all around. The student life here is super active, there are tons of student clubs that host different events all over the week, which provide great opportunities to make some new friends! One thing that really surprised me was how multidisciplinary the courses are. Being able to collaborate in diverse teams of designers and engineers is a rare opportunity that simply doesn't exist at many other institutions. It really pushes you to think outside the box and reflect more deeply on your work. P.S. If you’re lucky, you can even catch the Northern Lights right from campus!

Nothing to show

My experience studying nursing at Xamk.

Studying nursing at Xamk has been a practical and rewarding experience to me regardless of my previous background in-terms of profession. The programme strongly focuses on hands-on skills, simulation training, and clinical placements, which has helped me connect theory directly to real nursing practice. The teachers are supportive and approachable, and the learning environment encourages growth both professionally and personally, being able to also learn a new language (Finnish) within a short period of time with the help of Xamk has been a great milestone to me. Overall, Xamk has prepared me well for working life in healthcare.

ARCADA experience - Mechanical Engineering

In all honesty, my university offers a fantastic level of education, dedicated and extensively knowledgeable lecturers, as well as a spacious, clean, modern campus. These items make it a great place to study. However, one specific trait that bothers me personally is that some of the more important courses are limited to a single period (half a semester), to make space for other courses that I deem unnecessary or that could be optional instead of mandatory. Overall, my experience at Arcada has been outstanding.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close