Technical University of Berlin - TU Berlin vs International University of Art for Fashion - ESMOD Berlin vs University of Applied Sciences Europe vs Whitecliffe University of Applied Sciences vs Forward College

Side-by-side comparison from 65 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Forward College (4.70)
Technical University of Berlin - TU Berlin: wins 0/6 categories
International University of Art for Fashion - ESMOD Berlin: wins 1/6 categories
University of Applied Sciences Europe: wins 0/6 categories
Whitecliffe University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/6 categories
Forward College: wins 0/6 categories
CODE University of Applied Sciences: wins 4/6 categories
Catalyst – Institute for Creative Arts and Technology: wins 1/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Chemical Engineering
Best programme: Strategic Fashion Marketing
Best programme: International Marketing
Paris, France
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
32 reviews
×
Best programme: Data Science
Best programme: Music Production and Sound Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.50
4.45
5.00
Win
4.75
Location
3.94
3.00
Not rated
4.00
4.83
5.00
Win
4.25
Professors
4.06
4.00
Not rated
4.50
4.91
5.00
Win
3.88
Internationality
4.22
2.00
Not rated
5.00
4.56
5.00
5.00
Student life
4.06
2.00
Not rated
3.50
4.58
3.00
4.75
Win
Value
4.00
2.00
Not rated
4.00
4.56
5.00
Win
4.13
Accommodation
3.71
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.67
4.29
1.00
2.25
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Expert and supportive faculty
  • +Practical application and research focus
  • +Flexible learning and vibrant student life
  • +Comprehensive fashion industry training with expert teachers.

Nothing to show

  • +High quality education and knowledgeable, helpful professors
  • +Welcoming and international atmosphere with friendly people
  • +Vibrant campus life and cool architecture
  • +International and diverse community
  • +Interactive and engaging learning approach
  • +Focus on personal growth and development

Nothing to show

  • +Hands-on learning and practical experience
  • +Access to professional gear and facilities
  • +Supportive and collaborative environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology create frustrating learning environments.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency leads to confusion.

Nothing to show

  • -Frustration with administrative and management issues is common.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and unsupportive faculty are recurring complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequent sources of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
  • -A lack of clarity or support regarding curriculum and academic expectations is a common complaint.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

With an overall rating of 4, this institution demonstrates commendable strengths in **Internationality** (4.22) and **Student Life** (4.06), alongside solid scores for **Professors** and **Value**. Its **Accomodation** presents the area with the lowest score (3.71), suggesting potential for improvement in this aspect.

Assessing the university reveals a mixed picture. Outstanding ratings were achieved for Accomodation, scoring a perfect 5, and Facilities and Professors also received solid marks at 4. Conversely, Student Life and Internationality received lower scores of 2, indicating areas for potential improvement. Location and Value also scored a moderate 3 and a concerning 2 respectively.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong performance in its internationality, achieving a perfect score. It also excels in the quality of its professors, receiving a rating of 4.5. Conversely, the university's accommodation facilities present its weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 2.67. Other aspects like facilities and student life are rated moderately well, alongside a good location and value.

Evaluations reveal a strong academic offering, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.91. **Location** also scores exceptionally well at 4.83. The university demonstrates good performance in **Student Life** (4.58) and **Internationality** (4.56), with **Value** also rated favorably at 4.56. **Facilities** are rated at 4.45, and **Accomodation** stands out as the area with the lowest score at 4.29.

Nothing to show

This institution achieves outstanding scores in several key areas, notably Internationality (5.0) and Facilities and Student Life, both at an impressive 4.75. However, Accomodation presents a significant challenge, receiving the lowest rating at 2.25. Professors and Value also received solid, above-average scores.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4/5 average rating from 19 reviews, students praise strong academics, particularly in STEM fields, and appreciate research focus and practical application. Positive feedback highlights well-prepared professors and diverse learning opportunities. No negative feedback was reported.

With one review and an average rating of 4/5, this university is positively perceived. The single review highlights its prestige and comprehensive fashion industry training with knowledgeable instructors.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.75/5, student feedback is predominantly positive (~100%). Reviews highlight internationality, campus atmosphere, and excellent educational quality.

With an average rating of 4.66/5 from 32 reviews, students praise Forward College's enriching international environment and innovative, interactive teaching methods. Personal and academic growth are frequently highlighted.

Nothing to show

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~88% of feedback being 4-5 stars. Students praise hands-on learning, creative freedom, and access to professional-grade equipment. There is virtually no negative feedback.

Rating distribution
5★
21%
0%
0%
25%
66%
0%
25%
4★
58%
100%
0%
25%
34%
0%
63%
3★
21%
0%
0%
50%
0%
100%
13%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Practical and diverse university

I am currently a third-year student majoring in Data Science at BI international. My experience here has been overwhelmingly positive. The quality of education is excellent, with knowledgeable professors who are always willing to help and engaging course content that keeps me challenged and motivated. The campus life is vibrant and diverse, offering numerous clubs and organizations that cater to a wide range of interests. The university's facilities, including the library, labs, and recreational areas, are top-notch and well-maintained.

Great modern university approach

I am currently a 3rd year student at Forward College and I have thoroughly enjoyed the experience and would recommend it to other students. The interactive approach of Forward where questions, debate, and discussion were encouraged enhanced my learning so much and I feel like I genuinely enjoyed every class. Having the experience of living in 3 different cultures, surrounded by people from all over the world made this experience even more special and helped me develop and grow in so many ways. Another aspect I have loved are the professors. Speaking with friends at other university I am so grateful to have teachers that actually know us, are excited to teach and interact with us, and will always take the time to help you.

Fastest Growing Startup University In Germany

I have mixed feelings about my experience at Code University. On one hand, it's a privilege to study at one of Berlin’s most prestigious institutions tuition-free. The professors are knowledgeable, and the curriculum is practical and forward-thinking — it has definitely contributed to my growth as a student and aspiring entrepreneur. However, my journey here hasn’t been smooth. During my Orientation Semester, I struggled with shyness and social anxiety. I found it difficult to engage in class and to make friends. Unfortunately, instead of receiving support, I was mocked — not just by students (which I could handle), but also by some lecturers. That was deeply discouraging. With time, I worked on myself and broke out of my shell. I’m now more confident and driven, and I’m currently building what I believe will be one of the most impactful student-led projects to come out of CODE. Ironically, that seems to have caused some friction. I feel like certain individuals who underestimated me in the past are now uncomfortable with my progress and success. Rather than support me, it feels like they're trying to hold me back. To add to that, despite referring three international students to CODE — something I do as a side hustle — I haven’t received any acknowledgment or recognition. While many of my peers are featured on the university’s website, I’ve noticed that I’m not represented at all. So, would I recommend Code University? It depends. If you're resilient and can handle both the highs and lows without losing focus, then yes — the academic value is real. But emotionally and socially, it can be a tough environment, especially if you don’t fit into the dominant culture right away. That said, my story at CODE is still being written. Let’s see how it all turns out.

The Challenge

I'm a Creative Audio Production & Sound Engineering graduate. My experience at Catalyst was generally positive. It had a culture of friendliness, kindness and helpfulness from the staff, professors and students. The classes are not the typical classes but are more so akin to workshops. You get introduced to a subject, technique or idea and you are very quickly thrown in the deep end to get your hands dirty in experimentation and practice, which I prefer. You get access to studios and a lot of fancy audio gear. One downside I experienced is the limited studio time. I loved working in the big studios but they increasingly over the years kept getting harder to book due to limited availability. What I found to be the most impactful experience was how challenging the projects were. There were no exams, fun fact. Instead of exams, we had big projects that spanned the entirety of each semester with hard milestone deadlines in between. Since these projects span the whole semester, you can begin to imagine the scale of work involved in completing them. The challenge in handling all the projects pushed me to achieve more than I could have imagined. I needed an environment like that. In conclusion, my time at Catalyst was great. Through all the hard work my skills increased exponentially in a short period of time. The staff and teachers are amazing and always ready to help.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close