University of California Los Angeles - UCLA vs SKEMA Business School vs Schiller International University vs Lambda School vs University of Central Oklahoma
Side-by-side comparison from 296 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and passionate professors
- +Strong academic programs and career development resources
- +Vibrant and connected campus community
- +Global perspective and international exposure
- +Practical, real-world business application
- +Strong academic programs and skill development
- +Diverse student and educator backgrounds
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Helpful staff and organized curriculum
Nothing to show
- +strong science and math programs
- +well-suited for both undergraduate and graduate studies
- +exceptional, supportive faculty
- +transformative, holistic program approach
- +intellectual rigor and personal growth
- +Practical, real-world business experience and skill development.
- +Unique global mobility and diverse cultural immersion opportunities.
- +Valuable industry connections and strong peer networking.
- -Poor course structure and content quality.
- -Ineffective teaching and support.
- -Administrative and facilities issues.
- -Administrative & management issues cause disorganization and communication problems.
- -Teaching quality is poor, with faculty lacking student support and focus on profit.
- -Exams and results are poorly managed, impacting student progression.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant problems.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and career support limits student experience.
- -Teaching quality varies and some courses lack depth.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently cited.
- -Lack of career support and guidance is a significant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -A lack of clear communication and support exacerbates problems.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear or lacking.
Remarkably high marks are evident across several key university metrics. Professors and facilities stand out as the strongest aspects, both receiving scores above 4.46. Student life and value also score well. The weakest area, though still rated positively, is accommodation, with a score of 4.22. Internationality, while solid, is also among the lower-rated categories.
Examining the provided university ratings reveals a generally positive student experience, with **Internationality** standing out as the strongest area, achieving a score of 4.43. Professors and Location also received high marks. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the weakest aspect, scoring 3.71, suggesting an area for potential improvement. The remaining categories, including Facilities, Student Life, and Value, fall within a solid range, indicating a good overall offering.
This university is highly rated, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring an impressive 4.87. **Professors** also receive strong marks at 4.53. Conversely, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.62. **Facilities** are also on the lower end at 3.93, though **Student Life** and **Value** are rated positively around 4.1.
Nothing to show
This institution receives overwhelmingly positive evaluations. Its strongest aspects are clearly Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all achieving a perfect score of 5. The Facilities rating, while still good at 4, represents the sole area that is not top-tier. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths in almost every evaluated domain.
This institution excels in several key areas, receiving perfect scores for its professors, location, internationality, and value. These strengths suggest a robust academic environment with excellent accessibility and global outlook, all at a high value for students. Conversely, the university's weakest points are its facilities, student life, and accommodation, all of which scored zero. This indicates significant areas for improvement in campus infrastructure, social engagement, and housing provisions.
This institution demonstrates a consistently strong performance across key areas. It excels particularly in **Internationality**, **Student Life**, and **Location**, all receiving top marks. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation** also score highly. The **Value** proposition is well-regarded. While all ratings are impressive, the slight difference in scores suggests that the unique global atmosphere, vibrant campus experience, and convenient setting are standout features.
With ~94% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.27/5, students praise high quality education, approachable professors, and strong career development resources. Minimal negative feedback was reported.
The vast majority of reviews are positive, praising the international environment, practical skills, and global opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and program organization.
The university is highly praised for its diverse student body, rich learning experiences, and opportunities for personal and career growth. However, about 13% of reviews mention inconsistent teaching quality and administrative issues.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is highly recommended for science programs like applied mathematics. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 5/5 average rating, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. The single review praises the transformative PhD program, highlighting exceptional faculty and unique educational approaches. No negative feedback was provided.
Most student reviews are highly positive, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars and an average of 4.5/5. Recurring themes include brilliant concepts, learning by doing, and valuable real-world business experience. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
