University of Nairobi vs Murang'a University of Technology vs Meru University of Science and Technology vs Railways Training Institute - RTI vs Bridge College

Side-by-side comparison from 254 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Railways Training Institute - RTI (4.70)
University of Nairobi: wins 0/7 categories
Murang'a University of Technology: wins 0/7 categories
Meru University of Science and Technology: wins 2/7 categories
Railways Training Institute - RTI: wins 2/7 categories
Bridge College: wins 0/7 categories
University of Rwanda - UR: wins 1/7 categories
University of Nairobi: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics and Statistics
Best programme: Software Engineering
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Architectural Engineering
Nairobi, Kenya
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Business Finance
Best programme: Economic and Social Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
3.83
4.17
Win
4.00
Not rated
3.83
3.25
Location
4.61
4.29
4.09
4.67
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.25
Professors
4.38
4.14
4.00
4.33
Not rated
4.33
4.75
Win
Internationality
4.18
3.43
3.33
3.67
Not rated
3.33
4.25
Win
Student life
4.21
4.00
4.00
4.33
Win
Not rated
3.50
3.50
Value
4.40
3.86
4.25
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Win
4.50
Accommodation
3.75
3.86
4.08
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic prestige and employability
  • +Valuable opportunities for further studies and international scholarships
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty fostering critical thinking
  • +Strong academics and dedicated lecturers
  • +Vibrant campus life and sense of community
  • +Quality IT and applied science programs
  • +Modern, practical learning facilities and equipment
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable lecturers
  • +Emphasis on academic excellence and student well-being
  • +Practical, engaging learning with immediately applicable skills.
  • +Unique, specialized programs in niche fields.
  • +Quality campus facilities and resources.

Nothing to show

  • +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable professors
  • +Strong academic foundation with practical application opportunities
  • +Diverse, welcoming campus community and good infrastructure
  • +Engaging, practical learning with supportive professors
  • +Positive study environment and networking opportunities
  • +Real-world exposure and career shaping
Cons
  • -Overcrowding and poor learning environment.
  • -Outdated facilities and infrastructure.
  • -Declining quality of education with an overemphasis on theory.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are prevalent concerns.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unresponsiveness from staff create a negative experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Ineffective teaching and poor curriculum design are disliked.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in curriculum is disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for future careers.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners particularly strong scores for its **location**, achieving the highest rating. Professors and value also receive high marks. Conversely, **accommodations** represent the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other aspects. Overall, the university demonstrates a well-rounded profile with distinct areas of excellence.

With several strong points, this university garners high marks for its location, closely followed by its professors and student life. Accommodation and value also received solid scores. However, internationality is a noted area for improvement, as is the rating for facilities. Overall, it presents a mixed but generally positive picture, with a few distinct areas of excellence and some opportunities for growth.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas. The highest marks are for Value, closely followed by Facilities. Student Life and Accomodation also receive solid ratings. However, Internationality stands out as the weakest aspect, scoring considerably lower than other categories. The university's Location and Professors are rated well.

The institution receives very positive evaluations, with its location standing out as the strongest area. Professors and student life also earned high marks. Areas for improvement include internationality, which received the lowest score. Facilities, accommodation, and value were rated solidly in the middle.

Nothing to show

This institution garners high marks for its excellent **Location** (4.5) and outstanding **Value** (4.67). **Professors** also receive strong recognition (4.33). Conversely, **Internationality** (3.33) and **Student Life** (3.5) represent areas with lower ratings, indicating potential room for improvement in these aspects. **Accommodations** are rated a solid 4, while **Facilities** score 3.83.

Across surveyed categories, this institution garners an exceptional 4.75 for its professors, its strongest attribute. The university also scores highly in location and internationality, both at 4.25, and boasts strong value at 4.5. Conversely, facilities at 3.25 and student life at 3.5 represent the weakest aspects of the student experience, while accommodation sits at a moderate 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being favorable. Students praise academic prestige, employability, and faculty expertise. A small portion (~1%) of reviews mention overcrowding and infrastructure needs.

University reviews show high satisfaction, with ~100% positive feedback. Students highlight dedicated lecturers and solid academics. Some noted areas for improvement in facilities and results.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~92% rating it 4-5 stars and an average of 4.5/5. Students praise academic excellence, practical preparation, modern facilities, and approachable lecturers. No negative feedback was provided.

All three reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight practical modules, engaging lecturers, and valuable skills gained from their learning experiences. The university's unique rail and road courses and central Nairobi location were also appreciated.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.33/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students highlight knowledgeable professors, a strong academic foundation, and a diverse community. Some mention slow administrative processes.

All four reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students appreciate the learning environment, interactive and practical lessons, and supportive lecturer-student relationships. System delays are a minor, infrequently mentioned issue.

Rating distribution
5★
54%
43%
58%
67%
0%
50%
25%
4★
36%
57%
33%
33%
0%
33%
75%
3★
8%
0%
8%
0%
0%
17%
0%
2★
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
A Solid Foundation for a Career in Travel Tourism.

I started my Bachelor of Arts in Travel and Tourism at the University of Nairobi in 2015. The program gave me a solid foundation for understanding how the tourism and travel industry works, both locally and internationally. The coursework explored important areas like tourism management, destination development, and sustainable tourism. Through these subjects, I developed a deeper appreciation for how tourism drives economic growth and fosters cultural exchange. The lectures were not only knowledgeable but also genuinely supportive, often going the extra mile to mentor students beyond the classroom. Being in Nairobi was a real advantage. We had direct exposure to a vibrant tourism sector and a variety of industry stakeholders, which made learning much more practical and meaningful. Although some administrative processes could be a bit slow at times, my overall academic experience was truly rewarding. I recommend this program to anyone interested in building a career in the tourism and travel industry.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close