Estácio vs Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Fluminense Federal University - UFF vs Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro

Side-by-side comparison from 47 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Estácio: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ: wins 0/4 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 1/4 categories
Fluminense Federal University - UFF: wins 0/4 categories
Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro: wins 0/4 categories
Instituto Federal Fluminense: wins 3/4 categories
Brazilian Institute of Rehabilitation Medicine - IBMR: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Sao Paulo, Brazil
4.10
Read more reviews
27 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Computer and Information Science
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Library and Information Science
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Physical Education
Best programme: Bachelor in ICT
Category ratings
Facilities
3.96
4.00
4.56
3.75
4.00
5.00
Win
4.50
Location
4.00
4.50
4.78
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.50
Professors
4.12
4.50
4.67
4.40
5.00
5.00
5.00
Internationality
3.27
3.00
4.67
Win
3.60
4.00
4.00
3.00
Student life
3.80
3.50
4.00
3.80
4.00
5.00
Win
4.50
Value
3.62
5.00
4.00
4.80
4.00
5.00
3.00
Accommodation
3.45
2.50
3.22
2.60
3.00
5.00
Win
3.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +High-quality teaching and excellent, experienced professors
  • +Strong infrastructure and user-friendly online platform
  • +Helpful customer support and flexible learning options
  • +Excellent professors and project encouragement
  • +Strong infrastructure and facilities
  • +Career opportunities and international recognition
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
  • +Renowned academic programmes and diverse, interdisciplinary education
  • +Valuable student support, resources, and opportunities
  • +Qualified faculty and excellent campus facilities
  • +Highly qualified faculty and diverse educational techniques
  • +Freedom to explore various areas of knowledge
  • +New facilities and resources
  • +Enjoyable learning experience
  • +Practical and accessible learning with helpful professors
  • +Supportive and welcoming environment fostering friendships
  • +Good cost-benefit value and local convenience
Cons
  • -Financial focus and poor student care.
  • -Lack of professor support and unclear course organization.
  • -Inconsistent teaching methods and disregard for distance learning students.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching and curriculum lead to poor academic outcomes.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Poor communication and lack of responsiveness from staff are a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring complaints.
  • -Lack of updated curriculum and resources is a significant concern.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university demonstrates a solid standing with particularly strong performance in **Professors**, receiving a high rating of 4.12. The **Facilities** also rate well at 3.96. Conversely, **Internationality** presents the weakest area with a rating of 3.27, closely followed by **Accomodation** at 3.45. Other aspects like **Location** and **Student Life** are rated favorably.

The university exhibits strong performance in key areas, particularly in **Value (5)**, **Professors (4.5)**, and **Location (4.5)**. Conversely, **Accomodation (2.5)** stands out as the weakest aspect. Other areas, including Facilities and Student Life, receive solid scores, while Internationality is rated moderately.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its location and the quality of its professors, both receiving top marks. Value for money also stands out as a significant positive. Conversely, accommodation presents a considerable challenge, scoring the lowest among all categories. While student life and internationality are rated moderately well, facilities also fall into the average range, suggesting potential areas for improvement.

Overall, the university garners solid ratings across multiple aspects. It particularly excels in the **Professors** category, achieving a perfect score. **Facilities**, **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Internationality** all received strong marks at 4 out of 5. The lowest rating was for **Accomodation** at 3, indicating this area might benefit from further development. The **Value** proposition is also rated positively at 4.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength across key areas, receiving perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value. The university also boasts a strong international presence, indicated by its high rating in that category. While overall performance is outstanding, a slightly lower score in internationality suggests this is an area with room for further enhancement.

The university receives commendations for its excellent facilities, dedicated professors, and appealing location and student life, all scoring highly. Conversely, accommodation and internationality present areas for improvement, with lower scores. The overall value is rated moderately, suggesting room for enhancement in this aspect.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, praising excellent professors, supportive customer service, and a user-friendly online platform. A small percentage of feedback mentioned concerns about institutional support and course organization.

With a 4/5 average rating from two reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Positive themes highlight excellent infrastructure, career opportunities, and great laboratories. Minor concerns about room ventilation and bathrooms were noted.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

With an average rating of 4.2/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% of feedback is positive. Students frequently praise the breadth of course offerings and the quality of professors, highlighting opportunities and a critical perspective in education. No negative feedback was provided.

Based on one review, the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro is highly rated at 4/5 stars. The positive feedback highlights qualified faculty and a conducive campus environment. Infrastructure and scholarship incentives were noted for improvement.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university has received overwhelmingly positive feedback. The single review highlights a positive learning experience, particularly with newly established courses and facilities.

All (100%) reviews are positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight excellent quality, great support, and a welcoming environment. They found their studies valuable and a good cost-benefit option.

Rating distribution
5★
48%
0%
67%
40%
0%
100%
100%
4★
33%
100%
33%
40%
100%
0%
0%
3★
7%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
2★
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close