Estácio vs Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas - FMU vs International School of Management vs Ironhack vs Universidade Federal do ABC
Side-by-side comparison from 42 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Excellent professors and quality teaching
- +Flexible class schedules and balance with other responsibilities
- +Good infrastructure and student benefits/opportunities
- +High quality faculty and excellent teaching
- +Convenient location and safety
- +Scholarship and alumni discount programs
- +Expert professors and quality cohorts
- +Flexible learning and personalized support
- +Global exposure and networking opportunities
- +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
- +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
- +Engaging hybrid learning format
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and welcoming environment for international students
- +High-quality teaching and accessible information
- +Broadening of perspectives beyond career choice
- -Administrative and management issues negatively impact student experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support for distance learning students are problematic.
- -The institution's financial focus overshadows student welfare and education.
- -Lack of practical learning opportunities and rescheduled experiences.
- -Insufficient or outdated facilities impacting the educational experience.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
- -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Perceived lack of value for money.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of engagement in curriculum and teaching methods is a concern.
This institution receives strong acclaim for its **Professors**, scoring an impressive 4.27. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are also well-regarded, both earning 4.05. The **Location** is rated at a solid 4.0. However, **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area with a rating of 3.5, and **Internationality** also presents a lower score at 3.41. **Value** falls in the middle at 3.68.
This institution garners solid scores in several key aspects. Its location is a standout strength, while facilities and professors also receive favorable ratings. Student life and value for money are areas with room for improvement. Accommodation and internationality are the weakest points, suggesting opportunities for enhancement in these domains.
This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.
With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With top marks in professorial quality and internationality, this institution excels in these key areas. Students will find excellent facilities and great value for their investment. However, ratings for location, student life, and accommodation are more moderate, suggesting areas where improvements could enhance the overall student experience.
~87% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent professors, good infrastructure, and flexible schedules. A small portion of feedback (~13%) mentions concerns about financial focus and inconsistent teaching.
University feedback is mixed, with a ~25% of reviews expressing dissatisfaction. Positive feedback highlights respected faculty and good facilities, while negative comments focus on a lack of rescheduled lab classes and field trips.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.
With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Both reviews are highly positive, praising excellent professor support and student integration. University culture is described as a positive and accessible experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
