University of Groningen - RUG vs Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam - VU Amsterdam vs Eindhoven University of Technology - TU/e vs Fontys University of Applied Sciences vs International Management Forum (IMF)
Side-by-side comparison from 261 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High-quality, innovative education and renowned faculty
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +International atmosphere and self-development opportunities
- +Balanced theory/practice with real-world application
- +Diverse and international student community and faculty
- +High-quality, challenging education with expert guest lectures
- +Innovative, problem-solving engineering focus
- +Dedicated, knowledgeable, and supportive lecturers
- +Engaging learning, personal development, and strong community
- +Supportive and caring staff
- +Practical and international experience opportunities
- +Strong academic foundation and career preparation
Nothing to show
- +Flexible online learning model
- +Academic rigor and intellectual challenge
- +Supportive faculty and administration
Nothing to show
- -Lack of academic and administrative support, with uncaring professors and high failure rates.
- -Negative and exclusionary cultural environment, including racism, bullying, and stereotypes.
- -Poor communication and confusing academic processes that do not accommodate students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of support negatively impact the student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Inflexible and unengaging course content fails to meet student needs.
- -Lack of perceived learning despite accumulating credits.
- -Indifference from faculty and management to student concerns.
- -Outdated facilities and poor campus conditions.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Ineffective teaching and curriculum lead to poor educational outcomes.
Nothing to show
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Internationality stands out as its strongest point, with a very high rating. Student life and facilities also receive strong scores, reflecting positive campus experiences. However, accommodation emerges as a significant weakness, with a notably lower rating compared to other aspects. Professors and value are rated competently, while location is also a solid performer.
This institution shows a strong performance in key areas, with Internationality (4.26) and Value (4.19) receiving the highest marks. Professors (4.13) also earned a notably positive rating. Student Life (3.98) and Location (3.96) are also well-regarded. The weakest area, however, is Accomodation, which received a considerably lower score of 3.11.
This institution garners strong approval for its facilities and location, both scoring above 4.5. Professors and internationality also receive positive marks, exceeding 4.2. Student life ratings are solid at nearly 4.0. The weakest areas appear to be accommodation, with a score of 3.5, and value, which is rated at 4.35.
Offering a robust academic and campus experience, this university shines brightest in its **Facilities**, receiving a 4.42 rating. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.29. While **Location** and **Value** both score well at 4.25, **Student Life** is rated slightly lower at 3.83. The area with the most room for improvement is **Accomodation**, which received a 3.36 rating.
Nothing to show
An analysis of the university's ratings reveals a stark contrast between its strengths and weaknesses. The institution excels in **Value** (4.84), **Professors** (4.68), and **Internationality** (4.68). Conversely, **Location** (1.89), **Accomodation** (1.95), and **Student Life** (2.05) received significantly lower scores, indicating areas that may require improvement. Facilities are rated moderately at 2.74.
Nothing to show
~74% of reviews are positive, praising high-quality faculty, state-of-the-art facilities, and innovative teaching. ~12% of reviews express concerns about lack of support and difficult academics.
~93% of 51 reviews are positive, highlighting good theory-practice balance, knowledgeable lecturers, and program flexibility. No negative feedback was recorded.
With ~93% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.35/5, students praise the university's focus on engineering, innovation, and real-world problem-solving. They highlight engaging courses, dedicated lecturers, and a supportive academic environment.
With a 4/5 average rating, approximately 96% of reviews are positive, praising supportive staff, great facilities, and valuable opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~4%) expresses concerns about learning outcomes.
Nothing to show
Nearly all reviews are positive, with students praising academic rigor, challenging coursework, and flexible online learning. Supervisors and the platform are also frequently highlighted as supportive and effective.
Nothing to show
Not to use harsh words but Dutch culture is extremely toxic towards people who do not resemble their look and do not conform to their culture The school is extremely arrogant and disrespectful to people and caused me severe mental health stress and social isolation I believe such school is never place for exchanging knowledge or anything in fact the school bullying, and stereotypes towards autism on top of their staggering level of racism is insane. If you complaint about the racism of the people there, they will never take you seriously or initiate investigations One of the most regretful incidents of my life has been chosen to come to this school and that I regret very much If you’re of East Asian background, unless you have very good resistance to Dutch people’s “jokes” and passive aggression, I will almost certainly hope you never attend this school. Student Number s5884284
As a computer science student at the Vrije Universitet in Amsterdam, I have been thoroughly impressed with the quality of education and the level of expertise of the professors at this esteemed institution. The faculty members are passionate about their subjects and are always willing to provide guidance and support to students. The curriculum is rigorous, and the coursework is designed to challenge students and prepare them for the ever-evolving world of technology. The courses cover a broad range of topics, from programming languages and algorithms to artificial intelligence and machine learning. The faculty also encourages students to take part in research projects and internships, providing valuable opportunities to apply what we have learned in the classroom to real-world scenarios. The campus facilities are excellent, with state-of-the-art labs and equipment available for students to use. The university's location in Amsterdam also offers plenty of opportunities for students to engage in cultural and recreational activities outside of their studies. One of the things that stand out to me is the diverse student body. Being exposed to different perspectives and backgrounds has enriched my learning experience and expanded my understanding of computer science as a field. Overall, I would highly recommend the Vrije Universitet to any computer science student looking for a challenging and rewarding academic experience, excellent faculty, and a diverse and inclusive community.
My experience within TU/e is overall positive mainly due to the student focused approach that the university utilises in order to accomodate new students and make them feel at home. One of the ways this was achieved was by having a vast variety of student associations for absolutely every hobby that one might have. On top of that, the university promotes and encourages the participation within student teams which is a perfect bridge between studying and working as you get to experience how a real work environment functions while being surrounded by students. The university also provides different levels of guidance so that one can tackle any problem they face.
I like the possibility to self study, find materials and information, as well as the freedom of learning what I am interested in, while receiving feedback from my teachers which helps me getting on the right track.
Nothing to show
I am a PhD student at Global Humanistic University. I chose GHU because of its flexible and balanced learning model of online education. With the busy schedules of my entrepreneurial journey, GHU has offered me an effective education model which aligns with my aspiration of right balance between professional work, education, and family. My supervisor and the administration team are effective in their communication which makes learning and coordination hustle free. I recommend GHU for professionals who desire to enhance their education.
Nothing to show
