Nazarbayev University - NU vs Faculdades Metropolitanas Unidas - FMU vs Rudni Industrial Institute - RII vs Instituto Superior Técnico vs Central Ohio Technical College - COTC
Side-by-side comparison from 66 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging teaching with real-world relevance
- +Supportive and expert faculty
- +Enriching campus life and culture
- +High quality faculty and excellent teaching
- +Convenient location and safety
- +Scholarship and alumni discount programs
- +engaging and knowledgeable instructors
- +relevant and practical curriculum
- +supportive and collaborative learning environment
- +Exceptional teaching and expert faculty
- +Rigorous curriculum and strong academic preparation
- +Valuable extracurriculars and international opportunities
- +Hands-on, practical, and applicable skills
- +Supportive community and career success focus
- +Industry-expert faculty and tailored programs
- +Strong professor-student connections and personalized learning experiences
- +Highly qualified and supportive faculty
- +Small program size fosters intimate community
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of practical learning opportunities and rescheduled experiences.
- -Insufficient or outdated facilities impacting the educational experience.
- -Outdated facilities and poor condition of infrastructure.
- -Lack of practical application and outdated curriculum.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and poor management.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring issue.
- -Administrative inefficiencies and a lack of clear communication cause frustration.
- -Limited resources and support, particularly for learning and career development, are a major drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are a source of frustration.
- -Lack of transparency and communication from leadership is a significant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant problem.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
Nothing to show
This institution receives excellent feedback, particularly for its **Accomodation**, which is rated the highest at 4.625. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score remarkably well, both above 4.57. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.97. Other areas like Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.36.
This institution garners solid scores in several key aspects. Its location is a standout strength, while facilities and professors also receive favorable ratings. Student life and value for money are areas with room for improvement. Accommodation and internationality are the weakest points, suggesting opportunities for enhancement in these domains.
This university presents a uniform profile with no areas of particular strength or weakness identified, as all categories received a rating of zero. Consequently, it is not possible to highlight specific outstanding or concerning aspects based on the provided data. The institution's performance across facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value are all equally unrated.
This institution excels notably in its **Location**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Value** and **Internationality** also stand out as significant strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting an area for improvement, followed by **Facilities**. Ratings for **Professors** and **Student Life** fall within the mid-to-high range, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution scores exceptionally well in several key areas. Facilities and accommodation are particularly strong, both receiving perfect scores. Student life, professors, location, and internationality all garnered solid ratings of 4. The value for money is also rated highly at 5. The weakest area, though still positive, is the professors, at 4.
Exceptional marks define this university's profile, with perfect scores for its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, and internationality. Student life and overall value received solid ratings of four out of five. The university excels in providing top-tier resources and a globally-minded environment, while its student experience and perceived worth represent areas for potential enhancement.
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with a 4.43 average rating. Students praise well-rounded education, engaging professors, lively campus life, and excellent facilities.
University feedback is mixed, with a ~25% of reviews expressing dissatisfaction. Positive feedback highlights respected faculty and good facilities, while negative comments focus on a lack of rescheduled lab classes and field trips.
With only three reviews, the feedback is limited. Approximately 33.3% of feedback is negative, citing a lack of professionalism in classes. No positive reviews were provided.
With a 4.09 average rating from 22 reviews, ~77% of feedback is positive. Students praise challenging yet rewarding academics and excellent teaching staff. Zero negative reviews were recorded.
The single review indicates a positive student experience, highlighting hands-on learning and career-applicable skills. Nearly all feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4 out of 5 stars.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights the music program's intimate environment, qualified staff, and tailored student experiences. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
I am a graduate of Master in Public Administration, year of 2019. The program was amazing as well as academic team of the School of Public Policy. The program is designed for working professionals with various backgrounds and interests which makes this program unique. Your groupmates are going to be from different age groups and work environments, but they will all share the same goal of succeeding in their career as well as sharpening their skills. Also this kind of diverse environment gives you a great chance to learn about other’s experiences and grasp an opinion on how dilemmas in civil service or public policy are solved in their organizations and companies. Professor’s were great from the very first day, and became our friends by the end of the program. All the books and materials used were in compliance with the international best practices and this opinion comes from a person who did his bachelor’s in California back in 2015. If you are seeking for a program that can challenge your professionalism do not hesitate to apply for this program or choose NU as your next place to start your studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Not as good as most students would tell you. The facilities are far from brilliant: Almost every bathroom is dirty and broken. Prepare for an adventure if you're trying to find a place to study; since most rooms are crowded and there are no available power outlets for everyone (keep in mind this is an engineering university), people simply give up or spend hours looking for a place to study. The teaching/learning component is average at best: Most teachers are incapable of actually teaching. The evaluation method prizes students who are able to solve exercises faster, which gives me mixed feelings. Probably more than 70% of engineering students cheat on their tests because that's arguably the fastest way to solve them (and they have far better grades). The social interactions are awkward, to say the least: Most students that still haven't become depressed are cocky, and since they spend hours trying to collect exam resolutions, there's also a great division between people. Groups which somehow managed to get solutions for exercises/test/exams, will often refuse to share them with other mates - unless the other part has value to give as well. Not trying to be sexist, but the male portion of the students suffers from a very important problem, which is a greater difficulty in making friends, in creating relationships and also in having access to solved exercises or projects. This may not seem such a big deal, but the number of men who have become depressed while studying in IST is insane. They must spend more time when trying to collect information, they spend less time with actual people and day by day, year after year, most men sleep less, become more obsessed with virtual networks (i.e. games, social networks, forums, videos) and lose their social skills, which is a terrible side effect that really decreases the chances of future career success. The university is probably one of the most famous universities in Portugal, if not the most. Once a student finishes his degree, he usually finds no problems when looking for a job. The location is pretty good, there are a lot of surrounding places to eat and public transportation covers most of one's needs. I work now and I don't think I've learned a lot while I was a full-time studying in IST. I feel like I wasted a lot of my life and potential inside an institution where examination criteria was mildly unfair and most people were socially awkward, obsessive or manipulative. Definitely not the "best years of my life".
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
