Nazarbayev University - NU vs University of the Arts London - UAL vs Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul - PUCRS vs Astana Medical University vs Astana IT University - AITU
Side-by-side comparison from 206 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging teaching with real-world relevance
- +Supportive and expert faculty
- +Enriching campus life and culture
- +Supportive faculty and friendly learning environment
- +Practical skills and real-world application of knowledge
- +Diverse community and networking opportunities
- +Qualified and enthusiastic professors
- +Well-maintained, comfortable, and spacious campus facilities
- +Strong academic programs and career preparation
- +Few professors are truly passionate and knowledgeable
- +Curriculum is demanding but has a gap between theory and practice
- +Administrative processes are frustrating with unclear communication and schedule changes
- +Welcoming and supportive student community
- +Engaging campus life and opportunities for involvement
- +Modern facilities and practical, forward-thinking curriculum
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unfair grading and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and overcrowded classes.
- -Poor quality of teaching and irrelevant feedback from tutors.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Outdated facilities and technology
- -Lack of practical application and career preparation
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content and teaching methods are perceived as irrelevant or unengaging.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
- -The quality of teaching and curriculum is often criticized.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution receives excellent feedback, particularly for its **Accomodation**, which is rated the highest at 4.625. **Facilities** and **Student Life** also score remarkably well, both above 4.57. Conversely, **Location** emerges as the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.97. Other areas like Professors, Internationality, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.36.
This university demonstrates a strong performance, particularly excelling in **Internationality** with a rating of 4.19 and **Facilities** at 4.14. **Student Life** also received a commendable score of 4.11. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating at 3.61, followed by **Value** at 3.77. Other aspects like Professors and Location also scored positively, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.
This institution garners exceptional scores in its physical environment and placement. Facilities and Location both received outstanding ratings of 4.875. Professors were also highly regarded at 4.5, contributing to a strong academic perception. Student Life and Value also presented positively. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score of 3.29, alongside Internationality at 3.63.
This institution demonstrates particular strengths in its faculty expertise and international student engagement, both receiving a notable 4 out of 5. Conversely, the facilities, student life, and accommodation offerings are areas with room for improvement, each scoring 2.5. The university's location and overall value also received mid-range assessments.
This institution garners its highest marks for its facilities, scoring an impressive 4.49. Other strong areas include accommodation (4.36) and location (4.30). Student life, professors, and value also receive solid scores, all above 4.0. Conversely, internationality stands out as a weaker area, with a rating of just under 3.0.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%), with a 4.43 average rating. Students praise well-rounded education, engaging professors, lively campus life, and excellent facilities.
With an average rating of 4.13/5 from 72 reviews, ~85% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive staff, diverse communities, and practical learning. Negative feedback (~3%) cites poor support and course quality.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students praise qualified professors, comfortable campus facilities, and a strong community. No negative feedback was provided.
With one positive review and no negative feedback, sentiment leans positive (~50%). Students describe a demanding curriculum with some theory-practice gaps and outdated teaching methods. Administrative issues were also noted.
~92% of 88 reviews are positive, praising the welcoming student community, supportive environment, and engaging student life. Modern dorms and opportunities for involvement are also highlighted. There are no negative reviews.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I am a graduate of Master in Public Administration, year of 2019. The program was amazing as well as academic team of the School of Public Policy. The program is designed for working professionals with various backgrounds and interests which makes this program unique. Your groupmates are going to be from different age groups and work environments, but they will all share the same goal of succeeding in their career as well as sharpening their skills. Also this kind of diverse environment gives you a great chance to learn about other’s experiences and grasp an opinion on how dilemmas in civil service or public policy are solved in their organizations and companies. Professor’s were great from the very first day, and became our friends by the end of the program. All the books and materials used were in compliance with the international best practices and this opinion comes from a person who did his bachelor’s in California back in 2015. If you are seeking for a program that can challenge your professionalism do not hesitate to apply for this program or choose NU as your next place to start your studies.
I took a three months internship in UAL, London. I developed a project in the cosmetics area through my Erasmus Program. I'm just glad I took this opportunity because it was a lifetime experience. UAL is a great university and London College of Fashion is a great college. The course Cosmetic Science should be more recognised because it is really interesting.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Living in Kazakhstan while studying at Astana IT University has been a unique and enriching experience. Astana, the capital, is a city of contrasts, blending modern architecture with cultural heritage. The university’s location in the EXPO Business Center places it at the heart of this vibrant city, surrounded by iconic landmarks like the Nur Alem Pavilion. The city’s infrastructure is well-developed, with plenty of malls, cafes, and cultural venues like the Astana Opera, which I’ve enjoyed exploring. The university gives a comfortable and supportive environment. Student housing is modern, fostering a sense of community. Seasonal events and clubs have helped me make friends and feel connected. Winters are harsh but magical, while summers are warm and perfect for outdoor activities. Challenges include the high cost of living and the city’s remote location. Additionally, the university’s focus on IT limits opportunities for humanities students. Despite this, my time here has been a blend of academic growth and cultural immersion, making it a memorable chapter in my life.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
