Vietnam National University vs Ho Chi Minh City University Of Law - ULAW vs University of Engineering and Technology - UET vs Vietnam National Economic University - NEU vs British University Vietnam - BUV
Side-by-side comparison from 63 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers with practical insights
- +Strong international cooperation network and reputable faculty
- +High quality of education with unique training models
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable and encouraging staff
- +Strong academic reputation and graduate success
- +Emphasis on practical, innovation-based learning
- +Strong academic and professional development opportunities
- +Modernizing facilities and a dynamic learning environment
- +Well-structured business, economics, and finance programs
- +Beautiful, modern campus and excellent facilities.
- +Diverse, international community and supportive local people.
- +High-quality British education with passionate professors.
- +Practical, industry-relevant curriculum and experienced professors.
- +Strong career support and internship opportunities.
- +Challenging, skill-building programs that prepare for the workforce.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a consistent problem.
- -Course content and delivery methods are frequently criticized as uninspiring or irrelevant.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear course direction and insufficient professor support for deeper learning.
- -Perceived apathy from professors due to assumptions about student engagement.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a problem.
Nothing to show
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in its **location**, which received a near-perfect rating of 4.75. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.4. While many aspects, including facilities, student life, and internationality, achieved a solid 4, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.25. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with a few key strengths.
Nothing to show
Overall, this institution receives strong marks from students. Its professors and value proposition are particularly well-regarded, both earning 4.5 stars. Facilities, location, accommodation, and internationality are also rated favorably at 4 stars each. The student life aspect received the lowest score, at 3.5 stars, representing the sole area for potential improvement.
This institution garners excellent marks, particularly for its professors, location, student life, and overall value, all receiving a strong 4.5. Facilities also score well at 4. Facilities and internationality stand out as comparatively weaker areas, with ratings of 4 and 3.75 respectively. Accommodation also received a 3.75.
This institution receives high marks, notably excelling in **Facilities** with a score of 4.68. **Student Life** (4.39), **Accomodation** (4.32), and **Value** (4.46) also show considerable strengths. The university's **Location** (4.18) and **Internationality** (4.05) are its relatively weaker, though still respectable, areas. **Professors** are rated highly at 4.54.
An overall positive assessment is evident, with professors receiving the highest marks at nearly 4.9. Location and internationality/value are also notable strengths, both scoring above 4.5. Facilities and student life are rated well at 4.33. Accommodations represent the weakest area, though still a solid 4.
Nothing to show
With a 4.33/5 average rating from 6 reviews, university students praise lecturers' passion and expertise, alongside strong international cooperation (~83% positive). Some note outdated technology integration and course content.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.5 out of 5, 100% of reviews are positive. Students highlight well-educated staff and a strong academic reputation. Some suggestions include improving academic collaboration with industry and incorporating more practical, innovation-based projects.
All four reviews are positive, giving an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the strong academic training, dynamic learning environment, and networking opportunities. Some mention improving facilities but note a few outdated areas.
With an average rating of 4.44/5 from 41 reviews, ~90% are positive, praising the beautiful campus, professional staff, and strong British-standard education. A small amount of negative feedback (~2.4%) mentioned vague courses and insufficient professor support.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight practical, industry-focused teaching and strong career prospects. Though some found the campus a bit small, the overall experience is highly positive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
As a Chinese international student at BUV, I’ve had a wonderful experience. The students, teachers, and staff are always so friendly and ready to help with anything. There are so many clubs and activities, from skill-building workshops to just-for-fun events, and it feels like there’s something for everyone. These activities have helped me learn new things and make great friends. BUV is not just about academics it’s also a vibrant community where I feel supported and engaged.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
