Vietnam National University vs Ho Chi Minh City University Of Law - ULAW vs University of Transport and Communications vs Hanoi University of Industry vs British University Vietnam - BUV

Side-by-side comparison from 63 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Hanoi University of Industry (5.00)
Vietnam National University: wins 0/6 categories
Ho Chi Minh City University Of Law - ULAW: wins 0/6 categories
University of Transport and Communications: wins 0/6 categories
Hanoi University of Industry: wins 4/6 categories
British University Vietnam - BUV: wins 2/6 categories
FPT University: wins 0/6 categories
Foreign Trade University - FTU: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: Finance and Banking
Best programme: BSc Computer Science (awarded by University of Staffordshire)
Hanoi, Vietnam
4.30
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Communication and Media Studies
Best programme: Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.68
Win
4.25
4.33
Location
4.75
2.00
4.00
5.00
Win
4.18
4.75
4.44
Professors
4.40
3.00
4.00
5.00
4.54
5.00
4.89
Internationality
4.00
2.00
3.00
5.00
Win
4.05
4.25
4.56
Student life
4.00
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
4.39
3.75
4.33
Value
4.00
3.00
3.00
5.00
Win
4.46
4.25
4.56
Accommodation
3.25
3.00
3.00
4.00
4.32
Win
4.00
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers with practical insights
  • +Strong international cooperation network and reputable faculty
  • +High quality of education with unique training models

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Industry-relevant curriculum and practical learning
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive lecturers
  • +Networking opportunities with industry experts
  • +Beautiful, modern campus and excellent facilities.
  • +Diverse, international community and supportive local people.
  • +High-quality British education with passionate professors.
  • +Practical, hands-on learning opportunities
  • +Supportive environment for self-motivated learners
  • +Useful curriculum for real-world application
  • +Practical, industry-relevant curriculum and experienced professors.
  • +Strong career support and internship opportunities.
  • +Challenging, skill-building programs that prepare for the workforce.
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and in poor condition.
  • -The quality of teaching and course content is inconsistent.
  • -Lack of clear course direction and insufficient professor support for deeper learning.
  • -Perceived apathy from professors due to assumptions about student engagement.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring complaint.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a significant problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in its **location**, which received a near-perfect rating of 4.75. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.4. While many aspects, including facilities, student life, and internationality, achieved a solid 4, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.25. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with a few key strengths.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The university garners exceptional marks, particularly in **professors, location, student life, internationality, and value**, all receiving a perfect score. **Facilities and accommodation** are also strong, with ratings of 4 out of 5. The institution demonstrates outstanding performance across most evaluated areas, with no significantly weak aspects noted.

This institution receives high marks, notably excelling in **Facilities** with a score of 4.68. **Student Life** (4.39), **Accomodation** (4.32), and **Value** (4.46) also show considerable strengths. The university's **Location** (4.18) and **Internationality** (4.05) are its relatively weaker, though still respectable, areas. **Professors** are rated highly at 4.54.

Overall, this institution scores well across most metrics. Its strongest areas are clearly Professors, receiving a perfect score, and Location, which is highly rated at 4.75. Facilities and Internationality both achieve a solid 4.25. Student Life emerges as the weakest point, scoring 3.75. Accommodation and Value round out the positive scores at 4 and 4.25 respectively.

An overall positive assessment is evident, with professors receiving the highest marks at nearly 4.9. Location and internationality/value are also notable strengths, both scoring above 4.5. Facilities and student life are rated well at 4.33. Accommodations represent the weakest area, though still a solid 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.33/5 average rating from 6 reviews, university students praise lecturers' passion and expertise, alongside strong international cooperation (~83% positive). Some note outdated technology integration and course content.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The university receives a perfect 5/5 rating, with 100% of feedback being positive. Students found the curriculum highly relevant and industry-oriented, with knowledgeable lecturers and valuable industry connections.

With an average rating of 4.44/5 from 41 reviews, ~90% are positive, praising the beautiful campus, professional staff, and strong British-standard education. A small amount of negative feedback (~2.4%) mentioned vague courses and insufficient professor support.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~75%), highlighting engaging curricula with hands-on projects and practical experience. There is no negative feedback in the provided sample.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight practical, industry-focused teaching and strong career prospects. Though some found the campus a bit small, the overall experience is highly positive.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
0%
100%
56%
50%
67%
4★
33%
0%
0%
0%
34%
25%
33%
3★
17%
100%
100%
0%
7%
25%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

BUV - The Engagement Hub

As a Chinese international student at BUV, I’ve had a wonderful experience. The students, teachers, and staff are always so friendly and ready to help with anything. There are so many clubs and activities, from skill-building workshops to just-for-fun events, and it feels like there’s something for everyone. These activities have helped me learn new things and make great friends. BUV is not just about academics it’s also a vibrant community where I feel supported and engaged.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close