Vietnam National University vs Hanoi Law University vs Ho Chi Minh City University Of Law - ULAW vs Hanoi University of Industry vs Vietnam National Economic University - NEU

Side-by-side comparison from 73 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Vietnam National University: wins 1/7 categories
Hanoi Law University: wins 2/7 categories
Ho Chi Minh City University Of Law - ULAW: wins 0/7 categories
Hanoi University of Industry: wins 0/7 categories
Vietnam National Economic University - NEU: wins 0/7 categories
British University Vietnam - BUV: wins 3/7 categories
Foreign Trade University - FTU: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: School of Law
Best programme: Data Science
Best programme: Business Administration
Best programme: BSc Computer Science (awarded by University of Staffordshire)
Best programme: Business
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.00
3.00
4.25
3.80
4.69
Win
4.20
Location
4.75
Win
4.50
2.00
4.00
4.40
4.20
4.30
Professors
4.40
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
4.40
4.55
4.80
Internationality
4.00
4.00
2.00
3.80
3.80
4.07
4.50
Win
Student life
4.00
4.25
3.00
4.25
4.40
4.40
Win
4.30
Value
4.00
4.75
Win
3.00
4.00
4.40
4.48
4.50
Accommodation
3.25
4.00
3.00
3.75
3.60
4.33
Win
3.90
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers with practical insights
  • +Strong international cooperation network and reputable faculty
  • +High quality of education with unique training models
  • +Excellent professors and academic rigor
  • +High-quality facilities and resources
  • +Strong career focus and supportive environment

Nothing to show

  • +Practical and industry-aligned curriculum
  • +Supportive and enthusiastic professors
  • +Friendly and welcoming student environment
  • +Strong academic programs and training in economics and business.
  • +Quality education from experienced faculty.
  • +Improving facilities and diverse major options.
  • +Modern campus & supportive international environment
  • +Qualified & passionate faculty
  • +Affordable British-standard education
  • +Experienced faculty and industry connections
  • +Practical, skills-focused programs and real-world opportunities
  • +Strong reputation and challenging curriculum
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are commonly criticized.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support for students is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of resources and support impacts student experience.
  • -Lack of professor support and engagement with student curiosity.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners impressive scores, particularly excelling in its **location**, which received a near-perfect rating of 4.75. **Professors** are also highly regarded at 4.4. While many aspects, including facilities, student life, and internationality, achieved a solid 4, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 3.25. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with a few key strengths.

This institution demonstrates particular strength in its **professors (5)** and **value (4.75)**. It also scores very well for **location (4.5)** and **student life (4.25)**. While still strong, areas like **facilities (4)**, **accommodation (4)**, and **internationality (4)** received slightly lower, though still positive, marks.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates impressive strengths in its **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both receiving a high score of 4.25. While generally well-regarded, **Accomodation** stands out as a comparatively weaker area with a rating of 3.75. Other aspects like Professors, Location, Internationality, and Value also received solid scores, indicating a positive overall student experience.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths, with outstanding ratings for Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value, all scoring a high 4.4. Internationality and Facilities also fare well, earning a respectable 3.8. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.6.

This institution excels in its facilities, earning a near-perfect score. Professors also receive commendation for their quality. Areas for potential improvement include internationality, which scored the lowest among the surveyed aspects. Student life, accommodation, and value all demonstrate solid, above-average performance, alongside a respectable location rating.

A well-rounded university experience is reflected in these ratings, with professors earning the highest marks at 4.8. Internationality and value also stand out positively. The weakest area, accommodation, received a rating of 3.9. Other aspects like facilities, student life, and location received solid scores, all above 4.2, indicating a generally positive reception across the board.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.33/5 average rating from 6 reviews, university students praise lecturers' passion and expertise, alongside strong international cooperation (~83% positive). Some note outdated technology integration and course content.

With a 4.5/5 rating from 4 reviews, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes highlight top-notch facilities and experienced, dedicated professors. Some mention a heavy workload and administrative process slowness.

Nothing to show

With a 4.6/5 average rating from 5 reviews, ~80% are highly positive. Recurring themes praise practical IT curricula, supportive professors, and a welcoming environment. Limited facilities were a minor concern in some feedback.

Students praise NEU's strong academic training, dynamic learning environment, and experienced faculty, with ~100% positive feedback. Opportunities for academic and professional development are highlighted, though some facilities and sports areas could be updated.

With 4.45 stars from 42 reviews, most students praise the modern campus, supportive, qualified international faculty, and friendly, diverse student body. One review cited a lack of in-depth professor support.

All 10 reviews are positive, averaging 4.6/5 stars. Students praise practical, industry-relevant teaching and career readiness. Some note campus facilities are basic.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
50%
0%
80%
40%
57%
60%
4★
33%
50%
0%
0%
60%
33%
40%
3★
17%
0%
100%
20%
0%
7%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

BUV - The Engagement Hub

As a Chinese international student at BUV, I’ve had a wonderful experience. The students, teachers, and staff are always so friendly and ready to help with anything. There are so many clubs and activities, from skill-building workshops to just-for-fun events, and it feels like there’s something for everyone. These activities have helped me learn new things and make great friends. BUV is not just about academics it’s also a vibrant community where I feel supported and engaged.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close