University of Southern Denmark - SDU vs Zealand Institute of Business and Technology - ZIBAT vs Niels Brock Copenhagen Business College vs Copenhagen Business Academy vs Business Academy Aarhus
Side-by-side comparison from 29 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Collaborative, interactive, student-centered learning
- +Strong academic focus with practical application
- +Welcoming international environment and student support
- +Practical, business-oriented learning
- +Supportive teaching and staff
- +Real-world application and skill development
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and responsive teachers who guide learning
- +Development of independent and resourceful learning skills
- +Real-world company projects and teamwork focus
- +Practical, real-world projects and industry relevance
- +Accessible and supportive teachers
- +International learning environment and cultural exchange
- +Transformative learning & skill development
- +Challenging and growth-oriented environment
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
- -Students feel management is out of touch with their needs.
- -Exam formats and reliance on peer feedback are frustrating.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Course content is often irrelevant or not current.
Nothing to show
- -Academic content is superficial and unclearly explained.
- -Teachers can be rude, unprofessional, and unclear.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a constant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues create unnecessary stress and frustration.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization, cause frustration.
- -Lack of resources and support, such as insufficient staff and limited access to necessary materials, are frequently cited.
Nothing to show
Internationality emerges as the highest-rated aspect of the university experience. Facilities and Student Life also received strong scores. Conversely, Location garnered the lowest rating. Accommodation, Value, and Professors were rated well but fell below the top-performing areas. The overall impression is a positive one, with international students particularly finding the environment commendable.
With a near-perfect score of 5 across most metrics, this institution excels in its facilities, professors, location, and accommodation. Student life and value for money also receive positive marks, scoring a 4. The primary area for improvement lies in its internationality, which is rated a 3, suggesting opportunities to enhance global engagement and diversity.
Nothing to show
This institution excels in its **location**, receiving a perfect score, and boasts impressive ratings for **internationality** and **facilities** alike. Student life also scores highly, indicating a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, **value** for money and the quality of **professors** and **accommodation** are areas that could see improvement, though still receiving moderate ratings.
Across surveyed categories, this institution excels in **Internationality (5)**, **Facilities (4.5)**, **Accomodation (4.5)**, and **Value (4.5)**. Professors also receive high marks at **4.5**. The university's weakest areas are **Location**, rated at **3**, and **Student Life**, scoring **3.5**.
This institution excels in its facilities, earning a perfect score. Professors and location are also highly regarded, both receiving 4.5 out of 5. Student life and accommodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest areas lie in its internationality and value, with both scoring 3.5, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.
Nothing to show
With a 4.16/5 average, ~94.7% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic programs and a supportive, international environment. A small minority (~5.3%) expressed concerns about out-of-touch management and exam structures.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Students highlight practical skills, strong teachers with business backgrounds, and good learning environments, particularly in international commerce and marketing.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, ~75% of reviews are positive, highlighting inspiring missions, responsive teachers, and practical company work. ~25% of feedback mentioned a desire for a more in-depth academic experience and clearer teaching.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive, representing 100%. Reviews highlight practical, industry-relevant education and helpful, available teachers.
With a 4/5 average rating, the university is highly regarded. Approximately 50% of feedback is positive, highlighting transformative learning experiences and skill acquisition. No negative reviews were submitted.
Nothing to show
I was studying Engineering, Innovation & Business at the Sonderborg campus in the south of Denmark. The campus is a smaller one, but definitely one of the more beautiful ones. The building is placed right next to the water and inside you have the library with real trees and many opportunities to sit down and relax with friends on couches. The teachers are all very friendly and supportive. They know you by your name and their office is always open for you if you have any questions or need help (either academically, professionally or even personally). The student culture is great as well and you really get a sense of belonging to the community through the student bar, which is run voluntarily by the students and also through other student clubs and meetups. The difficulty of studying is fair. I would say it is a little bit easier compared to other European countries, but this also highly depends on the student. In general, however, I felt less pressure to study than in other universities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
