Ain Shams University vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs The British University in Egypt vs Egyptian Russian University vs Helwan university - HU

Side-by-side comparison from 79 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Ain Shams University: wins 0/6 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 5/6 categories
The British University in Egypt: wins 0/6 categories
Egyptian Russian University: wins 1/6 categories
Helwan university - HU: wins 0/6 categories
modern academy: wins 0/6 categories
Faculty of Pharmacy Cairo University: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Electronics and Telecommunication
Best programme: MBA specialisation Nursing
Cairo, Egypt
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Clinical Pharmacy
Category ratings
Facilities
3.78
4.67
Win
4.63
3.00
3.69
Not rated
3.00
Location
3.97
5.00
Win
4.36
2.00
3.33
Not rated
2.50
Professors
4.14
4.33
3.94
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
3.86
5.00
Win
3.94
3.00
3.46
Not rated
3.00
Student life
3.43
4.33
4.33
3.00
3.69
Not rated
2.50
Value
4.09
5.00
Win
4.31
3.00
4.00
Not rated
3.50
Accommodation
3.40
5.00
Win
4.13
1.00
3.23
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Supportive academic and personal growth environment
  • +Vibrant campus life and student activities
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Expert, supportive professors and rigorous, challenging academics
  • +High-quality campus facilities and learning resources
  • +Vibrant campus life, social activities, and diverse student body
  • +Strong international focus and challenging courses
  • +Dedicated faculty and close-knit community
  • +Unique educational experience
  • +High quality of teaching staff and accommodating faculty.
  • +Abundant academic resources and diverse, multidisciplinary programs.
  • +Excellent organization and supervision of university operations.

Nothing to show

  • +Excellent professors and strong practical training
  • +High-quality pharmaceutical education and career opportunities
  • +Well-structured curriculum and research exposure
Cons
  • -Outdated curriculum and inadequate facilities are frustrating.
  • -Lack of specialization options early in studies limits student choice.
  • -Negative interactions with professors create a poor learning environment.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Unhelpful professors and poor social engagement were major disappointments.
  • -Limited and exclusive extracurriculars restricted student participation.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and limited course availability frustrate students.
  • -Coursework policies and grading inconsistencies discourage genuine learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and outdated assessment formats are prevalent.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication lead to dissatisfaction.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates a strong academic focus, with its **professors** receiving the highest rating at 4.14 and **value** also scoring highly at 4.09. The **location** is also well-regarded. Conversely, **student life** and **accommodation** are the weaker areas, with ratings of 3.43 and 3.4 respectively, indicating potential room for improvement in these aspects of the student experience.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This university garners excellent marks for its facilities, achieving a high score of 4.63. Student life and value also stand out with strong ratings around 4.33 and 4.31 respectively. Accommodation is well-regarded at 4.13. However, the university's professors and internationality received the lowest ratings, both scoring 3.94. The location also scored a respectable 4.36.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in faculty quality, receiving a perfect score. However, it faces considerable challenges regarding accommodation, which received the lowest possible rating. Facilities, student life, internationality, and overall value are rated moderately. The location is also identified as a weaker area, with a score of two.

This institution performs exceptionally well in academic and financial aspects, with a perfect 4.0 rating for Professors and Value. Student Life and Facilities also received solid scores, both at 3.69. The weakest areas identified were Accomodation (3.23) and Location (3.33), though Internationality remains moderate at 3.46.

Nothing to show

When evaluating this institution, professors emerge as a significant strength with a rating of 4. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring just 2. The university also received moderate scores across facilities, internationality, and value. Student life and location were rated slightly below average.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Most reviews (~81%) highlight supportive professors and a great academic/campus environment. A small portion (~7%) mentioned outdated curricula or administrative issues.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

Nearly all feedback (approximately 94%) is positive, highlighting rigorous academics, expert professors, and good facilities. A small amount of criticism (~6%) notes limited social life and occasional administrative responsiveness issues.

The sole review for Egyptian Russian University is positive, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Positive feedback highlights the international focus and challenging courses, though minor administrative issues were noted.

With a 3.92 average rating, ~74% of reviews are positive, praising diverse faculties, quality teaching staff, and available resources. A small percentage (~7.7%) of negative feedback indicates disappointment with specific programs and grading practices.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5 from 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a strong pharmaceutical education, experienced professors, and excellent career opportunities. There are no negative reviews.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
100%
44%
0%
31%
0%
0%
4★
30%
0%
44%
100%
38%
0%
100%
3★
14%
0%
6%
0%
23%
0%
0%
2★
5%
0%
0%
0%
8%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Alsun

Ain Shams University is one of the best universities in Egypt. The professors are knowledgeable and supportive, and the academic environment encourages learning and personal growth. The campus offers a great atmosphere, and there are many student activities that make university life enjoyable. I'm proud to be part of this university and would definitely recommend it to anyone looking for a high-quality education.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close