Tanta University vs Poznan University of Technology - PUT vs University of Greenwich - UoG vs University of St. Thomas vs Swiss School of Management - SSM

Side-by-side comparison from 95 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Tanta University: wins 0/7 categories
Poznan University of Technology - PUT: wins 1/7 categories
University of Greenwich - UoG: wins 0/7 categories
University of St. Thomas: wins 0/7 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 6/7 categories
Business Consort: wins 0/7 categories
Management Forum: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Information Systems
Best programme: Civil Engineering
London, The United Kingdom
4.40
Read more reviews
64 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Saint Paul, Minnesota, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical and Computer Engineering
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Manchester, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
2.38
4.57
4.25
4.33
4.67
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Location
3.63
4.29
4.52
2.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
3.22
4.43
Win
4.34
4.33
4.33
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
2.67
4.14
4.56
4.67
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
2.38
4.21
4.25
2.67
4.33
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Value
2.78
4.07
4.23
4.33
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
2.83
3.93
3.82
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive professors and teaching staff
  • +Positive student experience and sense of belonging
  • +Good balance of academic and social life
  • +Practical teaching and research opportunities
  • +Industry connections and modern facilities
  • +English-taught programs and international environment
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty
  • +Welcoming and vibrant campus community
  • +Practical learning and real-world exposure
  • +Advanced lab facilities and research centers
  • +Strong theoretical and practical learning balance
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable professors
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Lack of practical learning opportunities and insufficient feedback.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources impede learning.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support create a negative student experience.
  • -Poor organization and lecturer availability are significant problems.
  • -Disruptions from strikes negatively impacted the learning experience.
  • -The value for money is perceived as poor.
  • -Unresponsive administrative and management issues plague students.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor technology hinder learning experiences.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear communication causes confusion.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This university shows a varied performance across different categories. Its strongest area is **Location**, achieving a high rating. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Student Life** are its weakest points, receiving the lowest scores. Other aspects like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value** fall somewhere in the middle, indicating areas for potential improvement and notable strengths.

This institution garners excellent scores across several key areas. Facilities stand out with a near-perfect rating, closely followed by strong performance in Professors and Location. Student Life and Internationality also receive positive marks. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, which, while still respectable, shows a noticeable dip compared to other categories. Value for money is rated moderately well.

Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Internationality** and **Location** emerging as its strongest attributes, both receiving ratings above 4.5. **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower score. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value are consistently strong, generally falling within the 4.2 to 4.3 range, indicating a well-rounded experience.

This institution excels in **Internationality**, earning a score of 4.67. Its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** are also highly rated, all coming in at 4.33. Conversely, **Location** and **Student Life** represent the university's weaker aspects, with scores of 2.33 and 2.67 respectively. **Accommodation** falls in the middle with a rating of 3.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.22 average rating, approximately 74% of reviews are positive. Students appreciate the balance of study and social life, with good professors and a respectable atmosphere. However, some negative feedback exists regarding lazy student affairs and limited practical education.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88% 4-5 stars), highlighting a modern campus, practical teaching, and strong industry connections. A small percentage of feedback (~12%) lacks negative commentary.

With a 4.42 average rating from 64 reviews, ~87% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive faculty, a vibrant community, and a beautiful campus. A small amount of negative feedback (~1.6%) noted organizational issues and lecturer inconsistency.

All three reviews were positive, giving a 5/5 average rating. Students highlighted world-class lab facilities, including advanced microgrid research, and a strong curriculum balancing theory and hands-on learning. Professors were described as knowledgeable and supportive.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
11%
31%
56%
100%
100%
0%
0%
4★
22%
56%
31%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
56%
13%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close