University of Nis - GAF vs National Taiwan University - NTU vs Atatürk University vs University of Nis Faculty of Electronic Engineering vs Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS

Side-by-side comparison from 17 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National Taiwan University - NTU (5.00)
University of Nis - GAF: wins 4/4 categories
National Taiwan University - NTU: wins 0/4 categories
Atatürk University: wins 0/4 categories
University of Nis Faculty of Electronic Engineering: wins 0/4 categories
Universiti Teknologi PETRONAS: wins 0/4 categories
Faculty of Sports and Physical Education University of Nis: wins 0/4 categories
University of Niš Faculty of Law: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Sociology
Best programme: Accounting and Taxation
Best programme: BA Hons English Literature
Best programme: Computer Engineering and Informatics
Category ratings
Facilities
5.00
Win
4.33
4.00
3.29
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
5.00
5.00
3.50
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
4.67
4.00
3.43
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
4.67
4.50
3.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
5.00
5.00
3.50
3.86
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
5.00
5.00
4.50
3.43
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
5.00
Win
4.67
4.00
2.57
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent faculty and diverse modules
  • +Encouraging professors fostering individual growth
  • +Excellent academic resources and quality faculty
  • +Beautiful campus and diverse student opportunities
  • +Welcoming and safe environment for international students
  • +Opportunities for personal and career development through clubs.
  • +Diverse student body and international recognition.
  • +Strong career & hiring opportunities
  • +Support for student events & exchanges

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Course content and delivery are often seen as irrelevant or poorly executed.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from faculty is a major concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is common.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and communication from staff is a problem.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across the board, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, achieving a perfect score of 5 in all evaluated areas. This indicates outstanding performance in its facilities, professor quality, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. There are no apparent weak areas, as every category received the highest possible rating.

This institution garners exceptional marks, with perfect scores in Location, Student Life, and Value. Professors and Accommodations also receive strong ratings at approximately 4.67. While Internationality is similarly well-regarded, Facilities represent the weakest area, rated at 4.33. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most aspects.

This institution receives high marks in several key areas, notably Internationality and Value, both scoring an impressive 4.5. Facilities, Professors, and Accomodation also fare well, with scores of 4. Location and Student Life are rated slightly lower at 3.5, representing the areas with the most room for improvement within its otherwise strong profile.

A university assessment reveals a strong emphasis on location and student life, both scoring 3.86. Professors and value also received solid ratings around 3.43. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a score of 2.57, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and internationality fall in the middle, with scores of 3.29 and 3.00 respectively.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 3.5/5 average rating from two reviews, positive feedback (~100%) highlights excellent faculty and professors encouraging growth. One reviewer mentioned diverse modules but noted a lack of chemistry labs. No negative feedback was recorded.

All 6 reviews are positive (100%), with an average rating of 5/5. Students frequently highlight excellent academic resources, dedicated professors, and a beautiful campus environment. No negative feedback was reported.

Reviews indicate a highly positive student experience, with all feedback being positive. Students highlight opportunities for personal development through clubs and career advancement. The university is recognized for its educational history and international student body.

With an average rating of 3.29/5, ~74% of feedback is positive, highlighting opportunities for hiring and exchange programs. Some suggest improving practical job-relevant knowledge and sector efficiency.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
0%
50%
29%
0%
0%
0%
3★
50%
0%
0%
71%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close