Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań - UAM vs Poznan University of Technology - PUT vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs WSB University - WSB vs Poznan University of Economics and Business - UEP
Side-by-side comparison from 156 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +World-class professors, knowledgeable and supportive mentors.
- +Beautiful, nature-filled campus and vibrant student life.
- +Supportive and inclusive academic environment with diverse opportunities.
- +Practical teaching and research opportunities
- +Industry connections and modern facilities
- +English-taught programs and international environment
- +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Well-organized and relevant programs
- +Positive learning environment and resources
- +Practical focus and internship opportunities
- +Flexible and hybrid learning formats
- +Welcoming environment and competent staff
- +Practical and theoretical education with understanding professors
- +Affordable city and housing options with many student opportunities
- +Extensive development and international study programs
- +Practical training and hospital exposure
- +Supportive and clear teaching methods
- +International community and global career opportunities
- +Practical, project-based learning and real-world competencies.
- +Personalized academic and professional growth support.
- +Inspiring, creative, and inclusive community atmosphere.
- -Administrative and management issues impact program coordination and quality.
- -Program relevance and curriculum offerings are not meeting student expectations.
- -Lack of dedicated resources and minimal effort from professors are noted.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources impede learning.
- -Poor communication and a lack of support create a negative student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
- -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
- -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support are common complaints.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Many students report outdated facilities and resources.
- -The curriculum and teaching methods are frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and organizational issues cause student stress.
- -Disorganized administrative processes and unhelpful staff are frustrating.
- -Outdated technology and limited resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and inconsistent policies cause confusion.
The university garners strong reviews across most aspects, with **Location** standing out as its highest-rated feature. Areas like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life** also receive very positive feedback. While **Value** and **Internationality** are rated lower than other categories, they still fall within a generally favorable range, indicating a solid overall university experience.
This institution garners excellent scores across several key areas. Facilities stand out with a near-perfect rating, closely followed by strong performance in Professors and Location. Student Life and Internationality also receive positive marks. The weakest area identified is Accomodation, which, while still respectable, shows a noticeable dip compared to other categories. Value for money is rated moderately well.
This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.
This institution receives commendations for its facilities and professors, both scoring a solid 4. The location stands out as the strongest area with a rating of 4.56. Conversely, student life at 3.63 and accommodation at 3.56 represent the weakest aspects. Internationality is also highly rated at 4.44, and value for money is good at 4.11.
This institution receives particularly strong commendations for its **location**, earning the highest rating. Professors are also highly regarded. Areas that received lower scores include **student life** and **internationality**, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects. Other categories like facilities, accommodation, and value fall within a solid, positive range, suggesting a generally well-rounded university experience.
This institution garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality**, which stands out as its strongest area. Location also receives a high rating, indicating positive aspects in these regards. Areas for potential improvement, based on the provided data, include Facilities, Professors, and Value, all receiving the lowest scores. Student Life and Accomodation are rated moderately well.
This institution garners high marks in several key areas, notably in **Professors, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation**, all receiving an impressive average of 4.67. **Facilities** and **Internationality** are rated solidly at 4, while **Value** sits at a respectable 4.33. The weakest rated category is **Facilities**.
Approximately 74% of 69 reviews are positive, highlighting world-class professors, a beautiful campus, and strong academic programs. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions program coordination issues.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~88% 4-5 stars), highlighting a modern campus, practical teaching, and strong industry connections. A small percentage of feedback (~12%) lacks negative commentary.
Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~78% of reviews are positive. Students highlight practical learning, internships, and flexible/hybrid class formats. Minor feedback mentions varied lecturer English proficiency and sometimes confusing program structure.
With an average rating of 4.45/5 from 11 reviews, approximately 91% of feedback is positive. Students praise excellent professors, good class organization, and many development opportunities like Erasmus programs.
Approximately 89% of reviews are positive, praising development opportunities, practical training, and supportive staff. About 11% of feedback mentions organizational issues like overlapping classes and exams.
All feedback is positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Reviews highlight practical, individualized education, project-based learning, and real-world competency development. Lecturers with business experience provide valuable hands-on insights.
In my opinion, Adam Mickiewicz University is a very solid institution, especially if you are interested in humanities, social sciences, or academic research. It has a good reputation, strong research facilities, and international connections, which provide significant opportunities for academic development. As for the drawbacks — the biggest challenges may be bureaucracy and administrative procedures, as well as the cost of accommodation, especially for international students. Therefore, it is worth carefully analyzing the faculties, the programme, and the housing options before starting your studies.
Nothing to show
I enrolled in the Psychology in English Bachelor's program during the pandemic in 2020. The pandemic situation was not clear, so the information regarding the format of the study was changing. Unfortunately, the first year was fully online, and I neither met most of my colleagues nor I studied in the building. It is hard to assess the quality of the program during this period; however, my overall perception was rather positive than negative. Most of the subjects were very interesting and some teachers met the "golden standard". They were engaged in the process and tried to encourage us. It was obvious that they were knowledgeable and interested in the subject they taught. On the other hand, since this program is in English and the teachers are Poles, a couple of them were not enough proficient in spoken English to provide us with information in a clear way. I consider it as a huge drawback because one of them was teaching Neurobiology subject which is quite challenging by itself and with language problems from the teacher's side it was almost impossible to stay focused and motivated during these lectures. The second year was brightened up by the fact that we were finally able to visit the building for some of our classes, although the minority of them. The building was right after the repairments, we witnessed modern and comfy classes with all the technical equipment that we might need. There are also a few cafes and a cafeteria with fair prices. All the pros and cons which I mentioned above moved to the second year, however, I noticed something more. From my point of view, the program is too easy. I realized that I do not have to spend too much time and effort to receive straight 5 points. On the one hand, it is good, since I have a lot of spare time and I can work. On the other hand, I see that after 2 years of studying I do not have the level of knowledge I expected to gain. I reckon the problem exists due to the two factors. First, a small number of graded assignments and a lack of truly challenging tasks. Second, lack of negative (fair) feedback. Psychologists are aware of the importance of feedback; therefore, we receive a lot of it, however, It is usually positive or neutral even in the cases when It should have been negative. That leads to a situation in which students do not actually know about their mistakes and will continue to make them in the future. Also, it gives the feeling that it is possible to cheat and do not put much effort into tasks, because the work will be marked as good or excellent either way. I was able to meet a couple of students from the psychology program in the Polish language and according to their stories, I concluded that the program in English is more theoretical and easier than in Polish. The second year has also shown several pros of the University regarding communication between University authorities and the student community. In case of any reasonable desire of changes in the studying process, it was possible to contact the University, write a petition, collect signatures and achieve the results. The University seems to care about students' opinions and satisfaction with the study process. In addition, the offline study format opened opportunities to participate in scientific and other activities. The University has several student scientific clubs and some professors offer an opportunity to assist in conducting research, however, that is very limited and not as interesting as I expected. I wish I'd started my education here after the pandemic to see how the University actually functions, whether there is a student's life and whether it is worth its price. To summarize: Pros: - Some of the teachers are very passionate and knowledgeable about their subject; - Good communication and attitude between the University and students; - Comfy classes with modern technical equipment; - Some opportunities to do scientific work. Cons: - Low level of spoken English of some teachers; - Easy/not very challenging program (lack of fair feedback and challenging tasks); - Increasing price without apparent reasons.
Nothing to show
Choosing this university was the best decision in my life. Poznań University of Economics and Business provides lots of opportunities to students. It allows students to go abroad to almost any country in the world. I have attented Erasmus at University of West London. I can honestly say that in my opinion PUEB is on very high level and take care of its students.
Honestly, my love for medicine is what keeps me here. Going to a school in a different country you have to adapt to different customs and ways of doing things which is very different to how things are run in my home country. My issue with this school is the organisation, sometimes classes overlap, sometimes exams overlap with classes and students have to sort this out themselves, which should not be happening. Timetabling and exams shouldn't be the students' responsibility medicine are stressful as it is. As I said this is how things are run in this country.
Nothing to show
