State College of Technology - FATEC vs Estácio vs Paulista University - UNIP vs International School of Management vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris

Side-by-side comparison from 64 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.70)
State College of Technology - FATEC: wins 2/6 categories
Estácio: wins 0/6 categories
Paulista University - UNIP: wins 0/6 categories
International School of Management: wins 2/6 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 0/6 categories
Ironhack: wins 2/6 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Event Management
Sao Paulo, Brazil
4.30
Read more reviews
24 reviews
×
Best programme: Law
Best programme: Biomedical Science
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
9 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Barcelona, Spain
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: UX/UI Design (User Experience / User Interface Design)
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.09
4.00
4.64
4.56
5.00
Win
Not rated
Location
5.00
4.05
4.64
4.64
4.78
5.00
Not rated
Professors
5.00
Win
4.26
4.79
4.82
4.67
3.00
Not rated
Internationality
5.00
Win
3.35
3.64
4.82
4.67
3.00
Not rated
Student life
4.00
3.91
4.21
4.50
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
Value
4.00
3.70
4.21
4.73
Win
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Accommodation
3.00
3.47
4.00
4.64
Win
3.22
4.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Caring, genius professors
  • +High quality education
  • +Excellent professors and quality teaching
  • +User-friendly online platform and strong customer support
  • +Great infrastructure and flexible learning options
  • +Excellent professors and attentive staff
  • +Modern campus and great facilities
  • +Encouraging student treatment and support
  • +Expert professors and quality cohorts
  • +Flexible learning and personalized support
  • +Global exposure and networking opportunities
  • +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
  • +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
  • +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with immediate application
  • +Experienced, professional instructors with industry expertise
  • +Engaging hybrid learning format

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
  • -Financial focus over student welfare and care.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and poor support for distance learners.
  • -Unclear and unsupportive administrative policies.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a persistent problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues create confusion and inefficiency.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as outdated and not aligned with current industry needs.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues.
  • -Perceived lack of value for money.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution boasts an impressive score for its professors, location, and international student experience, all receiving a perfect 5. Student life and facilities are also strong with 4-star ratings. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 3 stars. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, with particular strengths in academic quality and its global appeal.

With a robust score of 4.26, professors are consistently rated as the strongest aspect of the university. Facilities and location also received favorable marks around 4.0. Areas requiring improvement include accommodation, with a score of 3.47, and internationality, which stands at 3.35, indicating these are the weakest points in the overall evaluation.

With excellent scores in several key areas, this university shines particularly in its **professors**, receiving a near-perfect 4.79, closely followed by its **location** at 4.64. **Student life** and **value** also rate well at 4.21. The university's **internationality** stands as its weakest point, with a rating of 3.64, while **facilities** and **accommodation** are rated solidly at 4.

This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.

This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.

With exceptional marks in Facilities and Location, this institution clearly excels in its physical environment and accessibility. Student Life also receives top scores, suggesting a vibrant campus experience. Conversely, the university's weakest areas lie in its Professors and Internationality, both rated a moderate three. Value also sits at this mid-tier rating, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise good professors who care about them and their exceptional knowledge. There are no negative reviews.

Most students (~74%) praise excellent professors, quality teaching, and user-friendly online platforms. A small percentage (~8.3%) cited financial focus and inconsistent teaching methods, with some dissatisfaction for distance learning.

With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 16 reviews, ~81% are positive. Students praise modern facilities, convenient campus location, and supportive, helpful professors. No negative reviews were provided.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.

With an average rating of 3/5, feedback is evenly split, with ~50% positive and ~50% negative. Positive comments highlight practical, hands-on learning and professional instructors. Negative reviews express dissatisfaction with program value and staff.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
50%
54%
50%
64%
67%
50%
0%
4★
0%
29%
31%
36%
33%
0%
0%
3★
50%
8%
19%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Just starting and very happy

I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close