State College of Technology - FATEC vs Rivne State Humanitarian University vs University of Brawijaya - UB vs Muhamadiyah Malang University - UMM vs The University of Mississippi - Ole Miss
Side-by-side comparison from 43 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Caring, genius professors
- +High quality education
- +Intelligent specialists and creative personalities broaden horizons.
- +Supportive, knowledgeable, and approachable lecturers
- +Comfortable, well-equipped, and inspiring learning environments
- +Vibrant student life and opportunities for growth
- +Rigorous thesis and journal preparation is highly valued.
- +Effective supervisor guidance during the RTHI class is appreciated.
- +Some system complexities exist, causing repeated revisions.
- +Supportive and exceptional professors
- +Diverse and inclusive campus environment
- +Numerous social and personal growth opportunities
- +Supportive and inspiring faculty
- +Affordable cost of living and study
- +Positive and student-friendly city environment
- +International curriculum with unique Islamic integration
- +Different academic system compared to other universities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are significant problems.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring complaint.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Inadequate administrative support and unclear management.
- -Outdated facilities and limited resources for learning.
- -Lack of practical application and career preparation.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of essential resources and outdated curriculum hinder the learning experience.
- -Inadequate and poorly maintained facilities, especially restrooms.
- -Insufficient parking availability.
- -Inefficient administrative processes.
- -Administrative & management issues
- -Outdated facilities
- -Lack of resources & support
This institution boasts an impressive score for its professors, location, and international student experience, all receiving a perfect 5. Student life and facilities are also strong with 4-star ratings. The weakest area identified is accommodation, scoring 3 stars. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering, with particular strengths in academic quality and its global appeal.
Across all surveyed aspects, the university received uniformly average ratings. Its strongest and weakest areas are indistinguishable, as every category—Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, Internationality, and Value—scored identically. This consistent performance suggests no particular standout strengths or weaknesses are evident based on this assessment.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple facets. Its location is particularly well-regarded, alongside a vibrant student life and good value for money. Accommodation and internationality also receive favorable scores. While professors are highly rated, facilities represent the lowest, though still solid, area of assessment.
Across numerous aspects, this institution demonstrates outstanding strengths. Professors, location, student life, internationality, and value all achieved perfect scores, indicating exceptional experiences in these areas. Facilities and accommodation, while still strong, represent the comparatively weaker aspects with a rating of four.
This institution demonstrates strong performance in its facilities, earning a 4.5-star rating. Professors and student life also received high marks, both at approximately 4.43. While accommodation and value are rated well at around 4.29, internationality stands as the comparatively weaker area with a rating of 4.0. Overall, the university presents a positive picture with excellent core offerings.
This institution receives very strong marks in several key areas, notably Professors and Value, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life also garners significant praise at 4.6. Location stands out as a perfect 5. Facilities and Accomodation are rated well, around 4.17 and 4.33 respectively. The area with the lowest rating is Internationality, at 3.83.
Outstanding scores define this institution across every evaluated aspect. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a perfect 5 out of 5. This indicates a remarkably well-rounded and highly satisfactory university experience with no discernible weak points.
With an average rating of 4/5, this university receives overwhelmingly positive feedback. Students praise good professors who care about them and their exceptional knowledge. There are no negative reviews.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the sole review highlights intelligent specialists and creative personalities that diversify outlooks. No negative feedback was recorded.
With a 4.72 average rating, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100% of feedback). Students highlight inspiring learning spaces, supportive academic environments, and vibrant student life as key strengths.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5, indicating overwhelmingly positive sentiment. The single positive comment found the RTHI class helpful for thesis and journal preparation but noted system intricacies regarding supervisor revisions.
All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.57/5. Recurring themes include exceptional professors, a sense of belonging, and diverse opportunities.
~83% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive lecturers, and a nurturing learning environment. Some students also highlight affordable living costs and a green, well-maintained campus. A small portion (~17%) of negative feedback points to inadequate facilities, including poor-quality toilets and a lack of parking.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 average rating. It praises the international standard curriculum and unique integration of Islamic perspectives in courses.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Life at Universitas Brawijaya is quite dynamic and diverse. Students have the opportunity to get involved in various extracurricular activities, such as student organizations, clubs, and campus events. These activities provide additional experiences that are useful and enrich campus life. Universitas Brawijaya offers various facilities that support academic and non-academic activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show