Cairo University - CU vs Ain Shams University vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University vs October University for Modern Sciences and Arts

Side-by-side comparison from 120 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Cairo University - CU: wins 0/7 categories
Ain Shams University: wins 0/7 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 6/7 categories
Faculty of Applied Arts Helwan University: wins 0/7 categories
October University for Modern Sciences and Arts: wins 1/7 categories
Faculty of Pharmacy Cairo University: wins 0/7 categories
High Institute For Computers and Management Information: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Accounting
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Arts
Best programme: Bio-Pharmaceutical Sciences
Best programme: Clinical Pharmacy
Category ratings
Facilities
3.36
3.68
4.67
Win
4.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Location
3.97
3.87
5.00
Win
2.00
3.67
2.50
Not rated
Professors
3.73
4.05
4.33
3.00
4.67
Win
4.00
Not rated
Internationality
3.63
3.77
5.00
Win
1.00
4.00
3.00
Not rated
Student life
3.32
3.29
4.33
Win
3.00
3.67
2.50
Not rated
Value
4.07
4.00
5.00
Win
3.00
4.00
3.50
Not rated
Accommodation
2.90
3.25
5.00
Win
2.00
3.00
2.00
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic programs and research opportunities
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Focus on holistic student development
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Rigorous and challenging academic programs
  • +Strong academic reputation and educational foundation
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +N/A (No positive themes in the provided review)
  • +Outstanding professors and hands-on learning
  • +Rigorous and comprehensive pharmacy program
  • +Supportive faculty and practical skill development
  • +Excellent professors and strong practical training
  • +High-quality pharmaceutical education and career opportunities
  • +Well-structured curriculum and research exposure

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues, including inefficient scheduling and poor student treatment.
  • -Outdated teaching methods and facilities.
  • -Overwhelming exam pressure.
  • -Outdated curriculum and poor facilities.
  • -Lack of specialization options early in studies.
  • -Perceived issues with faculty and management.
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor upkeep are a recurring problem.
  • -Limited resources and inadequate support hinder learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and unclear communication lead to dissatisfaction.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university excels in its **location**, receiving the highest rating, and offers strong value. Student life and facilities are also well-regarded. However, **accommodation** presents the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Internationality and professor quality are rated positively, suggesting a generally favorable academic and social environment with room for improvement in housing provisions.

Overall, this university receives high marks, particularly in **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring above 4.0. Its **Facilities** and **Student Life** present the most significant areas for improvement, with ratings in the mid-3s. **Location**, **Internationality**, and **Accomodation** fall within a moderate range, suggesting a generally positive but not exceptional experience in these aspects.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

A mixed bag of ratings emerges for this university. Its strongest points are its **Facilities**, scoring a commendable 4, and a solid **Professors** rating of 3. However, significant weaknesses are evident in **Internationality** (1), **Location** (2), and **Accomodation** (2), suggesting areas requiring considerable improvement. Student Life and Value both received moderate scores of 3.

Overall, this institution receives strong evaluations, particularly in **Professors**, which stands out with a high rating. **Facilities** and **Internationality** also score well, indicating solid strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** is the weakest area. **Location** and **Student Life** are rated moderately, suggesting room for improvement alongside the positive aspects.

When evaluating this institution, professors emerge as a significant strength with a rating of 4. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, scoring just 2. The university also received moderate scores across facilities, internationality, and value. Student life and location were rated slightly below average.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academic research, knowledgeable professors, and a supportive, vibrant learning environment. A small percentage of feedback (around 4%) mentions issues with management and outdated methods.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting supportive professors and challenging academic programs. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions outdated curriculum and administrative issues.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

With a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive feedback, reviews highlight the university's large campus size. Some mention administrative delays as a minor drawback.

With an average rating of 4/5, reviews are largely positive, highlighting outstanding professors and rigorous, comprehensive programs that effectively blend theory with practical skills. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 4/5 from 2 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight a strong pharmaceutical education, experienced professors, and excellent career opportunities. There are no negative reviews.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
39%
45%
100%
0%
33%
0%
0%
4★
30%
33%
0%
100%
33%
100%
0%
3★
27%
15%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
2★
3%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
3%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Amazing opportunity

Thank you so much for this amazing opportunity that you give me to improve my skills and start my new career proficiently. I was petroleum engineer for 8 years and I quit my job to follow my passion in digital marketing. Also I have a nano-degree in digital marketing but most of companies/agencies/clients need someone with experience. This opportunity is my first step toward my dream job.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close