Cairo University - CU vs Swiss School of Management - SSM vs The British University in Egypt vs Egyptian Russian University vs Thebes Higher Institute for Engineering

Side-by-side comparison from 106 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Swiss School of Management - SSM (5.00)
Cairo University - CU: wins 0/6 categories
Swiss School of Management - SSM: wins 5/6 categories
The British University in Egypt: wins 0/6 categories
Egyptian Russian University: wins 1/6 categories
Thebes Higher Institute for Engineering: wins 0/6 categories
Assiut University: wins 0/6 categories
El Sewedy University of Technology - SUTech: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Accounting
Bellinzona, Switzerland
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Nursing
Best programme: Electronics and Telecommunication
Best programme: Bachelor of Medicine
Category ratings
Facilities
3.46
4.67
Win
4.63
3.00
Not rated
3.67
4.00
Location
3.97
5.00
Win
4.36
2.00
Not rated
3.75
3.00
Professors
3.84
4.33
3.94
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.75
3.00
Internationality
3.70
5.00
Win
3.94
3.00
Not rated
4.50
4.00
Student life
3.43
4.33
4.33
3.00
Not rated
3.75
3.00
Value
4.11
5.00
Win
4.31
3.00
Not rated
3.50
4.00
Accommodation
3.05
5.00
Win
4.13
1.00
Not rated
3.50
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong academic foundation and practical application
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Vibrant campus life and career preparation
  • +Practical, real-world preparation
  • +Personal and professional growth
  • +International experience
  • +Expert, supportive professors and rigorous, challenging academics
  • +High-quality campus facilities and learning resources
  • +Vibrant campus life, social activities, and diverse student body
  • +Strong international focus and challenging courses
  • +Dedicated faculty and close-knit community
  • +Unique educational experience

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality, knowledgeable faculty
  • +Diverse academic programs and learning opportunities
  • +Positive student activities and general atmosphere

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Outdated facilities & teaching methods
  • -Excessive exam pressure
  • -Frustrating administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant curriculum.
  • -Unhelpful professors and poor social engagement were major disappointments.
  • -Limited and exclusive extracurriculars restricted student participation.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of resources and limited course availability frustrate students.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

The university demonstrates particular strength in its **Location** (3.97) and **Value** (4.11), suggesting these are key advantages. **Accomodation** ratings, however, are the lowest at 3.05, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like Professors (3.84), Internationality (3.7), Facilities (3.46), and Student Life (3.43) fall within a moderate to good range.

This institution boasts exceptional scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for **Location**, **Accomodation**, **Internationality**, and **Value**. The **Facilities** also stand out with a strong rating of 4.67. Areas showing slightly less consistent strength, though still positive, include **Professors** and **Student Life**, both rated at 4.33.

This university garners excellent marks for its facilities, achieving a high score of 4.63. Student life and value also stand out with strong ratings around 4.33 and 4.31 respectively. Accommodation is well-regarded at 4.13. However, the university's professors and internationality received the lowest ratings, both scoring 3.94. The location also scored a respectable 4.36.

This institution demonstrates significant strengths in faculty quality, receiving a perfect score. However, it faces considerable challenges regarding accommodation, which received the lowest possible rating. Facilities, student life, internationality, and overall value are rated moderately. The location is also identified as a weaker area, with a score of two.

Nothing to show

This institution performs exceptionally well in **Internationality**, earning a high rating of 4.5. Other areas like **Professors**, **Location**, and **Student Life** also received positive marks, all averaging 3.75. Areas for potential improvement include **Facilities** and **Accomodation**, which scored 3.67 and 3.5 respectively, representing the lower end of the evaluated categories.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

~73% of 81 reviews praise a strong academic foundation, knowledgeable faculty, and preparation for careers. A small amount of negative feedback (~3.7%) mentions administrative issues or exam pressure.

All three reviews are overwhelmingly positive, awarding a perfect 5/5 rating. Students highlight the university's encouragement of creativity and practical, real-world business preparation. The international experience and the balance between theory and practice are also frequently praised.

Nearly all feedback (approximately 94%) is positive, highlighting rigorous academics, expert professors, and good facilities. A small amount of criticism (~6%) notes limited social life and occasional administrative responsiveness issues.

The sole review for Egyptian Russian University is positive, with an average rating of 4/5 stars. Positive feedback highlights the international focus and challenging courses, though minor administrative issues were noted.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating from 4 reviews, ~75% are positive. Students highlight diverse learning opportunities and quality faculty. Limited attention to non-academic activities was noted in one review.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
41%
100%
44%
0%
0%
25%
0%
4★
32%
0%
44%
100%
0%
50%
0%
3★
23%
0%
6%
0%
0%
25%
100%
2★
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Amazing opportunity

Thank you so much for this amazing opportunity that you give me to improve my skills and start my new career proficiently. I was petroleum engineer for 8 years and I quit my job to follow my passion in digital marketing. Also I have a nano-degree in digital marketing but most of companies/agencies/clients need someone with experience. This opportunity is my first step toward my dream job.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close