Bashkir State University vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU vs Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS

Side-by-side comparison from 76 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Bashkir State University: wins 0/2 categories
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 0/2 categories
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University - SPbPU: wins 0/2 categories
Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO: wins 2/2 categories
Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS: wins 0/2 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/2 categories
Center for Creative Leadership: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Sterlitamak, Russia
5.00
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Germanic Languages
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Accounting and Management
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology of Human Resources Development
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.14
4.14
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Location
Not rated
4.67
4.64
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Professors
Not rated
4.33
4.18
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.18
4.39
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Student life
Not rated
4.10
4.85
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Value
Not rated
4.48
4.33
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.99
3.66
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and accessible teaching
  • +Great opportunities for professional development and future careers
  • +Good living conditions and university facilities
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +Advanced labs and modern equipment
  • +Highly qualified and involved teaching staff
  • +Diverse academic and extracurricular development opportunities
  • +Engaging, relevant instruction from passionate, supportive faculty.
  • +Emphasis on analytical thinking and practical application of concepts.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +Student-centered support and inclusivity
  • +Welcoming and understanding community
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a major concern.
  • -Ineffective communication and disorganization from administrative staff cause frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a recurring issue.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Ineffective teaching methods and curriculum design are problematic.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content can be irrelevant or not up-to-date.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform rating across all evaluated aspects. With identical scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to report. The consistent zero in every category suggests a lack of differentiation in perceived quality across these key university metrics.

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

Overall, this university garners strong scores across most categories. Student life stands out as a particular strength, boasting the highest rating. Location also scores very well. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest marks, indicating an area for potential improvement. The university demonstrates a solid reputation for its professors, facilities, internationality, and value.

This institution achieves perfect scores across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a stellar 5 out of 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong and well-rounded university experience with no discernible weak points based on this rating system.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 15 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight excellent learning conditions, professional professors, and strong career prospects.

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

~92% of reviews are positive, praising skill development, modern labs, and qualified, involved teaching staff. Students also highlight extracurricular activities and university prestige. No negative feedback was recorded.

With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting engaging coursework, interactive instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.

Rating distribution
5★
100%
65%
44%
100%
0%
0%
100%
4★
0%
22%
44%
0%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
9%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Polytechnic

'-': some equipment and manuals, that we study, are outdated. All buildings, except the main one, need to be repaired. Some teachers are incompetent in their subjects. ' ': Opportunities. A lot of opportunities. Large number of events are held at the university and if you will participate in them, you will develop yourself very much.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close