Bashkir State University vs University of Rostock vs Universidad Austral De Chile - UACH vs LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR vs Edutus University

Side-by-side comparison from 35 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Bashkir State University (5.00)
Bashkir State University: wins 0/6 categories
University of Rostock: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad Austral De Chile - UACH: wins 1/6 categories
LSPR Communication & Business Institute - LSPR: wins 5/6 categories
Edutus University: wins 0/6 categories
Universitas Bhayangkara Jakarta Raya: wins 0/6 categories
University of Gabès: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Sterlitamak, Russia
5.00
Top
Read more reviews
15 reviews
×
Best programme: Germanic Languages
Rostock, Germany
4.40
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Budapest, Hungary
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.21
2.00
4.25
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Location
Not rated
4.43
1.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Professors
Not rated
4.57
3.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
Not rated
3.93
3.00
4.75
Win
Not rated
Not rated
1.00
Student life
Not rated
4.43
5.00
Win
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Value
Not rated
4.29
2.00
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
Not rated
4.00
1.00
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and accessible teaching
  • +Great opportunities for professional development and future careers
  • +Good living conditions and university facilities
  • +Practical, market-aligned programs with excellent course design and simulations.
  • +Supportive academic environment with knowledgeable and approachable professors.
  • +Strong research opportunities, often with modern equipment and industry connections.

Nothing to show

  • +Convenient fixed schedules and central location
  • +Outstanding and supportive lecturers
  • +Valuable skills and practical learning opportunities

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a major concern.
  • -Ineffective communication and disorganization from administrative staff cause frustration.
  • -Lack of resources and support for students is a recurring issue.
  • -Nationality-based grading bias and lack of project support for international students.
  • -Outdated course content and professors with limited knowledge.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
  • -Lack of communication and unclear expectations cause confusion.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a uniform rating across all evaluated aspects. With identical scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value, there are no standout strengths or weaknesses to report. The consistent zero in every category suggests a lack of differentiation in perceived quality across these key university metrics.

The university garners strong approval, particularly in the realm of its professors, who received the highest marks. Student life and location also scored very well, indicating positive experiences in these areas. While accommodation received a solid rating, internationality emerged as the lowest-rated category among the surveyed aspects. Overall, the university demonstrates a favorable performance with room for enhancement in its global engagement.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all receiving a high rating of 4.75. **Student Life** and **Accommodation** are rated a solid 4, indicating a good overall experience. The **Value** proposition also scores well at 4.5. The **Facilities** category, while still positive at 4.25, represents the area with the lowest score.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 15 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight excellent learning conditions, professional professors, and strong career prospects.

Nearly all student reviews are positive, highlighting practical courses, modern facilities, and approachable professors. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions outdated course content and perceived grading bias.

Nothing to show

All four reviews are positive, highlighting convenient schedules for working students and excellent lecturers. The central Jakarta location is also frequently praised. No negative feedback was provided.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
100%
57%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
4★
0%
36%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close