Cleveland State University - CSU vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs University of Ruhuna vs University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien vs Vilnius Business College

Side-by-side comparison from 116 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Cleveland State University - CSU (4.70)
Cleveland State University - CSU: wins 5/7 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/7 categories
University of Ruhuna: wins 0/7 categories
University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien: wins 0/7 categories
Vilnius Business College: wins 0/7 categories
The Frederic Chopin Music University, Warsaw: wins 0/7 categories
Hellenic Mediterranean University: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
99 reviews
×
Best programme: History
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
Matara, Sri Lanka
4.60
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Best programme: Bachelor of Software Engineering
Best programme: Mechanical Engineer
Category ratings
Facilities
4.64
3.25
4.40
Not rated
4.20
Not rated
4.67
Win
Location
4.76
Win
4.75
4.40
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.67
Professors
4.77
Win
3.25
4.40
Not rated
4.40
Not rated
3.67
Internationality
4.60
Win
3.50
4.00
Not rated
3.80
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.63
3.75
4.20
Not rated
3.80
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.45
Win
2.75
4.40
Not rated
3.60
Not rated
3.33
Accommodation
4.49
Win
2.00
4.20
Not rated
3.60
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Exceptional faculty expertise and mentorship
  • +Excellent learning opportunities and engaging instruction
  • +Welcoming and supportive environment with top-notch amenities
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth
  • +Good lecturers, staff, and facilities
  • +Beautiful location and natural environment
  • +Professional and diverse faculties

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive international admissions & smooth processes
  • +Practical, modern curriculum with relevant skills
  • +High-quality education and dedicated faculty

Nothing to show

  • +Qualified, knowledgeable staff.
  • +Solid academic foundation.
  • +Need for more practical application.
Cons
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Inflexible and unresponsive administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Lack of engaging and relevant teaching methods leads to disinterest.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective teaching and poor communication are major concerns.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant or poorly structured.

Nothing to show

  • -Overcrowded and poorly maintained facilities are a frequent complaint.
  • -Students express frustration with administrative and management issues.
  • -A lack of resources and support for academic and personal needs is a recurring concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution garners excellent reviews, particularly for its professors, who received the highest marks. Students also appreciate the location and facilities. Areas for potential improvement include accommodation and the value proposition, though these still maintain solid scores. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded and positive student experience.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

This institution garners strong marks across multiple aspects, with facilities, professors, location, and value all receiving an impressive 4.4. Student life and accommodation also rate well at 4.2. The university's internationality stands as its relatively weakest area, scoring 4.0, though still indicating a positive level of global engagement. Overall, the feedback suggests a well-rounded and highly-regarded educational environment.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates impressive strengths, particularly in its **Professors** (4.4) and **Facilities** (4.2). The **Location** also scores well at 4.0. Areas for potential improvement lie in **Accomodation** and **Value**, both receiving a 3.6 rating, with **Student Life** and **Internationality** slightly higher at 3.8. Overall, the university is well-regarded, especially for its academic and physical resources.

Nothing to show

This university excels in student life, receiving a perfect score of 5. Facilities and location also score highly at 4.67. Areas for improvement include professor quality (3.67) and value (3.33), which are the weakest ratings. Accommodations and internationality both stand at a respectable 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all (98 out of 99) reviews are positive, with students praising excellent faculty, strong mentorship, engaging instruction, and useful course material. They also highlight good amenities and an inclusive environment. No negative feedback was reported.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

With an average rating of 4.6/5 from 5 reviews, ~80% are highly positive. Students praise the university's beautiful location, good facilities, and professional lecturers. No negative feedback was recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.2/5, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight a nice environment and good quality of practical education. The admission process is frequently praised for being smooth and supportive.

Nothing to show

With a 3.67 average rating and no negative feedback, ~67% of reviews are positive. Students mention manageable courses and qualified staff but suggest strengthening practical components and industry connections.

Rating distribution
5★
69%
50%
80%
0%
60%
0%
0%
4★
30%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
3★
1%
0%
20%
0%
40%
0%
33%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close