Maastricht University - UM vs University of Groningen - RUG vs Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences - HRO vs Wittenborg University of Applied Sciences vs HAN University of Applied Sciences
Side-by-side comparison from 213 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and engaging teaching methods
- +International atmosphere and diverse student body
- +Problem-Based Learning (PBL) and small-group work
- +High-quality faculty and innovative, interdisciplinary teaching
- +World-class, relevant programs and state-of-the-art facilities
- +International atmosphere and opportunities for self-development
- +Practical, real-world learning experiences and industry focus
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Flexible learning paths and knowledgeable instructors
- +Practical, industry-focused curriculum with entrepreneurship and FinTech emphasis
- +Supportive, international, and diverse academic environment
- +Engaging and approachable professors and mentors
- +Practical, industry-relevant learning with engaged, experienced staff.
- +Excellent facilities and a supportive, high-quality educational environment.
- +Balanced student life opportunities with an international atmosphere.
- +Welcoming community and supportive staff
- +Engaging courses and academic freedom
- +Excellent facilities and infrastructure
Nothing to show
- -Problem-based learning is seen as ineffective and overly demanding.
- -Strict academic policies, including high failure rates and BSA, create undue pressure.
- -Program organization and structure are often perceived as poor.
- -Lack of support and care for academic progression
- -Arrogance, disrespect, and discrimination
- -Confusion and inflexibility in academic processes
- -Students dislike outdated facilities and poorly maintained infrastructure.
- -Many students express frustration with disorganized administrative processes and unresponsive management.
- -Course content and teaching methods are often perceived as irrelevant or not engaging.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a significant drawback.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities are a recurring complaint.
- -Unresponsive or unhelpful staff contribute to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and inadequate support hinder learning.
Nothing to show
This university garners excellent marks for its internationality, receiving a high rating of 4.54. Professors and value are also strong points, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and facilities are well-regarded, with ratings around 4.0 and 4.2 respectively. The location is rated adequately at 3.9. Notably, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a score of 2.9.
This university garners strong approval in several key aspects, particularly excelling in Internationality with a rating of 4.27. Student Life and Facilities also received high marks, both exceeding 4.20. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 2.88. Other areas like Professors, Location, and Value are rated moderately well, generally falling between 3.83 and 4.05.
This institution garners strong acclaim for its **Facilities**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Student life also receives a favorable 4.33. The university offers good value at 4.5 and a respectable 4 for its professors. Its weakest area, however, is **Accomodation**, with a rating of 3.25.
A notable strength lies in the university's **Internationality**, achieving a high rating of 4.875. Conversely, **Student Life** received the lowest score at 2.625, suggesting an area for potential improvement. Other areas, including Accommodation, Location, Value, and Professors, fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded offering with specific areas of excellence and those needing development.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, receiving a high rating of 4.43. Facilities and value are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.29. Conversely, the university's **location** and **accommodation** received the lowest marks at 3.86, suggesting these areas may warrant further attention for improvement. Student life and internationality are rated moderately well, with scores of 4.00 and 4.14 respectively.
This university garners strong marks across multiple categories, with exceptional ratings for its **Facilities** (4.75) and **Student Life** (4.66). **Location** also scores highly at 4.49. Areas with more moderate scores include **Professors** (4.12), **Internationality** (4.16), and **Accomodation** (4.06). The **Value** for money is rated at 4.32. Overall, the university excels in its physical environment and student experience, while areas like faculty and housing present opportunities for growth.
Nothing to show
Approximately 91.5% of reviews are positive, highlighting a welcoming campus, supportive professors, and a lively student city. Negative feedback, representing ~8.5%, points to high failing rates and concerns about the organization and pressure of Problem-Based Learning.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality faculty, state-of-the-art facilities, and excellent academic programs. A smaller ~11% of feedback expresses concerns about teaching support and student well-being.
All 6 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.5/5. Students praise the real-world learning, hands-on projects, internships, and international environment. Some minor suggestions include more structured courses and improved communication.
Most feedback is positive (~74%), highlighting practical learning, entrepreneurship focus, and internationalism. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~88% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars and an average of 4.25/5. Recurring themes include excellent facilities, supportive staff, and effective practical teaching. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Nearly all reviews are positive, ~100%, highlighting great facilities, approachable teachers, and a supportive environment. Students appreciate new buildings and engaging course content. No negative feedback was recorded.
Nothing to show
One of the most advertised features of the university, it is very pressuring and does not deliver the promised results - everything still has to be learned in the same manner as everywhere else - but here no tutorials are to be missed and PBL is supposed to be a key to successful graduation. Doing twice the work, therefore dividing the attention and time resources, without other options for students struggling with this method - then you are on your own.
Not to use harsh words but Dutch culture is extremely toxic towards people who do not resemble their look and do not conform to their culture The school is extremely arrogant and disrespectful to people and caused me severe mental health stress and social isolation I believe such school is never place for exchanging knowledge or anything in fact the school bullying, and stereotypes towards autism on top of their staggering level of racism is insane. If you complaint about the racism of the people there, they will never take you seriously or initiate investigations One of the most regretful incidents of my life has been chosen to come to this school and that I regret very much If you’re of East Asian background, unless you have very good resistance to Dutch people’s “jokes” and passive aggression, I will almost certainly hope you never attend this school. Student Number s5884284
Studying International Business we moved to a new building in my third year of University. The new building is amazing and has an encouraging atmosphere. I am constantly surrounded by different cultures and encouraged to meet new people. I was able to design my own learning path, choose topics I was interested in, and study abroad. The course could be a little more structured and I think the university could work on its communication sometimes, but overall I am really satisfied with my decision.
Nothing to show
The lesson materials we are receiving are quite interesting in regards to the course. We are learning about global issues and how to handle encountering different cultures as international social workers.
My experience with the university is going pretty well for now. In terms of education, I can say that they have thought about everything. The program is structured in such way that the study load never gets to be too much. You get to work with different kinds of materials, therefore, practice different skills. Also, it is very career-oriented - you can see how everything you learn will help you in the future. Another positive thing is that if you experience any challenges in your personal or education plan, there is always someone you can contact and get help or advice. Here, you can find the balance between social and student life. The environment is very international, as well. Basically, it gives a wonderful opportunity to grow in the professional plan, but also make connections. However, there is something that you should consider if you are planning to apply here, or anywhere in the Netherlands - the shortage of accommodation. The university provides rooms for first-year students, but after that, it is quite hard to get one on your own. If you are looking for a place, where you get excellent education without having to give up on your social life, I would definitely recommend it.
Nothing to show
