Escuela Europea de Negocios vs UIC Barcelona vs Universidad de Murcia - UMU vs Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena vs Universidad CEU Cardenal Herrera - CEU UCH
Side-by-side comparison from 132 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Renowned university status and societal impact
- +Welcoming and fulfilling study abroad experience
- +Excellent teaching structure
- +Excellent academic quality and well-prepared graduates
- +Supportive and international student community
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Practical and theoretical classes, teacher dedication, and education quality
- +Diverse teaching models (face-to-face, blended, e-learning) and career opportunities
- +Vibrant city life, social activities, and pleasant weather
- +Engaging and well-organized programmes enhancing knowledge and practical skills.
- +Supportive and professional professors fostering personal and professional development.
- +Welcoming environment with ample resources and excellent facilities for student well-being.
- +Practical work experience and career preparation
- +Supportive and passionate faculty
- +Enriching international environment and social connections
- +Supportive and attentive faculty
- +High-quality, well-organized programs
- +Diverse and international community
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization, are frequently criticized.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common source of frustration.
- -The curriculum is often perceived as irrelevant or poorly delivered.
- -Administrative and management issues.
- -Unhelpful and indifferent staff.
- -Deceptive financial practices.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The university fails to deliver on its promises of quality education and student experience.
- -Poor teaching quality and limited continuous evaluation.
- -Scarce Erasmus opportunities, few electives, and no specializations.
- -Limited international student presence and an unengaging city.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Unengaging teaching methods and poor course structure frustrate students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are recurring problems.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and curriculum concerns are frequently mentioned.
Nothing to show
Receiving outstanding marks, this institution excels particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, all scoring a perfect 5. Facilities and Location also stand out with a strong 4. The university's weakest, though still highly positive, area lies in its Facilities and Location, which, while good, did not reach the perfect score achieved in other key aspects.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback, with **Professors** receiving the highest marks at 4.25, followed closely by **Facilities** at 4.17. **Student Life** is rated a respectable 3.75, while **Internationality** scores 3.83. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest rating of 3.33, and **Location** at 3.91. The university also scores well in **Value** at 3.92.
With location emerging as the university's strongest asset, followed closely by student life, prospective students will find these areas highly favorable. Conversely, facilities and value received the lowest scores, suggesting these might be areas for improvement. Ratings for professors, accommodation, and internationality fall in the mid-range, indicating a generally satisfactory but not outstanding performance in these aspects.
Campus facilities and student life received solid marks at 3.6 each. Accommodation and location stand out as particularly strong points, both scoring a high 4.6. Internationality also fared well with a 3.8 rating. However, the university's professors were rated the lowest, coming in at 3.0, indicating this area could benefit from attention.
Across surveyed categories, this institution excels in its **Facilities**, boasting an impressive rating of 4.67. Equally strong are **Student Life** and **Internationality**, both scoring 4.63. **Value** and **Professors** also receive favorable marks around 4.53. The area with the lowest rating is **Location**, at 3.95, indicating it's the primary point for potential improvement. **Accomodation** is rated moderately at 4.11.
Reviewing the university's performance reveals a mixed but generally positive picture. The strongest area for the institution is clearly its professors, who received an excellent rating. Students also appear to be well-served by the location and student life. Areas with slightly lower, though still respectable, scores include facilities, accommodation, internationality, and value for money.
Nothing to show
With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, sentiment is overwhelmingly positive. The reviewer highlighted their rewarding acceptance, a welcoming atmosphere, and excellent teaching structure.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting strong academics, supportive classmates, and good job preparation. ~7% of feedback is negative, citing issues with unhelpful administration.
Most of the 66 reviews (approximately 74%) are positive, highlighting good teaching, diverse learning models, and opportunities. A small percentage (around 3%) mention issues with evaluation systems and organizational improvements.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~86%), with students highlighting good programs, skill development, and a welcoming atmosphere. A small portion of reviews (~7%) mention issues with teachers, limited Erasmus destinations, and a lack of specialization.
With a 4.44/5 average, 24 out of 25 reviews are positive. Students highlight excellent faculty, good facilities, and valuable real-world work experiences. No negative feedback was reported.
With a 4.18 average rating from 11 reviews, students praise UCAM's high-level teaching, supportive faculty, and enriching academic and international environments. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Classes are good, I would try to make them more interactive and with more practices in class. Professors normally are good, in the english course I believe the english of the teachers could be better specially if the course is taught in that language. I also believe professors could interact more with their students and try to get in contact with students they see may be struggling. Otherwise the campus, although a bit small is fine, really nice, the library could be a little bigger.
Así, a priori, puede parecer un buen lugar: desde luego tiene una amplia oferta de grados, que luego amplía con su homónima de Cartagena para las carreras tecnológicas. Es una Universidad bonita, con un paisaje agradable, cerca del centro, y que promete poder ofrecerte una formación de calidad al tiempo que vives "una de las mejores etapas de tu vida", pero nada de esto se cumple aquí. La Universidad se preocupa de cumplir con los servicios más básicos y nada más. Cuando te adentras un poco en su estructura te das cuenta de que te ofrece poco más allá del propio grado Universitario, grado, de hecho, plagado de profesores desmotivados y compañeros decididos a importar directamente de los institutos la infantilidad más insoportable, como si eso de madurar no fuese con ellos. Saldrás de allí con un conocimiento mejor o peor del ámbito que hayas estudiado, la Universidad se encargará de eso. Pero si buscas una oferta amplia de prácticas curriculares y extracurriculares, un ambiente acogedor y comprometido con la buena formación del alumnado, calidad a la hora de ampliar tu formación en el extranjero y, a fin de cuentas, una formación real y no sólo fingida, márchate de aquí, Murcia no es tu sitio.
Nothing to show
Studying Advertising and public relations at CEU Cardenal Herrera was an enriching and transformative experience. One thing I standout is the combined theoretical and practical skills we learned throughout the career. We work hand on hand with well known brands that give us a profesional view and a bigger understanding of the profesional world. The multicultural environment at CEU help me develop cultural sensibility and open my perspective because of the diverse backgrounds. The most enriching experience was living in the amazing city en Valencia, its stunning architecture and its amazing food. I graduated feeling confident and prepared to enter to the professional world.
The life in Murcia is simply great! A lot of tapas bars, bars, clubs etc. which are affordable for students! During the courses at UCAM, I got to know so many international people who got really good friends in the meanwhile. The only shortcoming is that several professors have difficulties to explain their ideas in English, because of the language barrier. But this does not concern every teacher. Furthermore, the teaching staff is not only about professors but about people having their own business and talking about their own experiences. All in all the education is pretty good at UCAM. But the working-life balance is even better. "Savoir-Vivre!"
Nothing to show
