emlyon business school vs Mumbai University vs Shri Vile Parle Kelvani Mandal - SVKM vs upGrad vs Ecole Intuit Lab
Side-by-side comparison from 124 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
- +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
- +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
- +Comprehensive course offerings and accessible education
- +Engaging practical sessions and knowledgeable faculty
- +Streamlined application and submission processes
- +Excellent faculty and well-designed curriculum
- +Opportunities for student growth and participation in activities
- +Focus on student welfare and comprehensive education
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Strong engineering and technology programs
- +Dedicated study and rigorous qualification processes
- +Management education expansion
- -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program support.
- -Administrative inefficiency and poor management are significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and the reality of the college experience differ from promotions.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are consistently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging teaching methods and outdated curriculum are disliked.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources are a frequent complaint.
- -Inconsistent or poor communication from administration and faculty is a significant issue.
- -Heavy workload and challenging academic rigor are often cited as sources of dissatisfaction.
Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location** and **value for money**, both receiving high marks. **Student life** and **professors** also earned positive scores. Conversely, **facilities**, **accommodation**, and **internationality** present areas for potential improvement, indicated by their lower ratings. Overall, the university offers a compelling proposition, particularly for those prioritizing location and value, with opportunities to enhance the student experience in other aspects.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for its professors, location, and internationality. Student life and overall value are also highly regarded. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, receiving a comparatively lower rating. Facilities are rated well but not exceptionally.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, earning high marks for its facilities, professors, location, and internationality, all rated a solid 4 out of 5. Student life also scores well at 3.5. The weakest area identified is accommodation, receiving a rating of 3, suggesting room for improvement in this category. Overall, the university presents a generally positive picture with notable strengths.
The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good learning experiences, helpful staff, and a wide range of courses. A small percentage (4.6%) of negative feedback mentions administrative inefficiency and concerns about course relevance.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, these reviews highlight a positive student experience. The feedback praises excellent faculty, a strong curriculum, and supportive infrastructure, contributing to ~100% positive sentiment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a high average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Students highlight globally recognized excellence in engineering and technology, with some programs expanding into management. There is no negative feedback.
Nothing to show
The faculty and university is good. But, if you an't to take admission in french department then take admission only if you have a keen interest in literature and history. Because this department specialises in those domains. But, if you want to explore other practical applications of language such as linguistics and translation. In that case, considering other universities is a better option. Because literature is very heavy and everybody does not has the capacity to handle all of that.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
