emlyon business school vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs upGrad vs Sharda University vs GEDU Global Education

Side-by-side comparison from 70 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Dayalbagh Educational Institute (5.00)
emlyon business school: wins 0/7 categories
London School of Commerce - LSC: wins 0/7 categories
upGrad: wins 0/7 categories
Sharda University: wins 0/7 categories
GEDU Global Education: wins 0/7 categories
Dayalbagh Educational Institute: wins 3/7 categories
TETR College of Business: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
London, The United Kingdom
3.80
Read more reviews
4 reviews
×
Best programme: Administration
London, The United Kingdom
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: BA Political Science
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Management
New York City, United States
4.50
Read more reviews
6 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Management & Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.16
3.25
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.40
Win
Location
4.54
4.75
Not rated
3.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.60
Professors
4.05
3.25
Not rated
3.25
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Internationality
4.56
3.50
Not rated
3.25
Not rated
3.00
4.67
Win
Student life
4.24
3.75
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.60
Win
Value
4.40
2.75
Not rated
3.25
Not rated
4.00
4.50
Win
Accommodation
3.94
2.00
Not rated
2.75
Not rated
5.00
Win
4.50
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
  • +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
  • +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
  • +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
  • +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
  • +Opportunities for exposure and growth

Nothing to show

  • +Welcoming, diverse environment and friendly, helpful staff.
  • +Excellent facilities, resources, and engaging campus activities.
  • +Strong academic programs with skill development opportunities and good placement prospects.

Nothing to show

  • +Strong research focus & societal contribution
  • +Interdisciplinary opportunities
  • +Practical, real-world business experience and skill development.
  • +Unique global mobility and diverse cultural immersion opportunities.
  • +Valuable industry connections and strong peer networking.
Cons
  • -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
  • -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
  • -Poor professor engagement and program support.
  • -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
  • -Lack of support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently lacking or unclear.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear or lacking.
Rating summary
What students say

Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.

This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.

Nothing to show

An analysis of university ratings reveals notable strengths and areas for improvement. The institution excels in **Facilities** and **Student Life**, both scoring a perfect 4. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating at 2.75. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value are rated moderately well, hovering around the 3.25 mark. The **Location** is also rated a solid 3.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates excellence in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Professors, Location, and Accomodation. Facilities and Student Life also receive strong marks. However, the university's Internationality rating is comparatively lower, suggesting an area for potential growth, while Value is rated well.

This institution demonstrates a consistently strong performance across key areas. It excels particularly in **Internationality**, **Student Life**, and **Location**, all receiving top marks. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation** also score highly. The **Value** proposition is well-regarded. While all ratings are impressive, the slight difference in scores suggests that the unique global atmosphere, vibrant campus experience, and convenient setting are standout features.

Reviews summary
Highlights

The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.

The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 3.75/5 from 4 reviews, approximately 50% of feedback is positive. Students praise good infrastructure, a wide variety of cultures, and friendly, helpful faculty. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

Nothing to show

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, the single review highlights DEI's strong interdisciplinary focus across numerous Ph.D. programs. This emphasis on research for societal development is a recurring positive theme.

Most student reviews are highly positive, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars and an average of 4.5/5. Recurring themes include brilliant concepts, learning by doing, and valuable real-world business experience. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

Rating distribution
5★
58%
50%
0%
25%
0%
100%
67%
4★
29%
25%
0%
25%
0%
0%
17%
3★
11%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
17%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
25%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Loving it here!

Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close