emlyon business school vs Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU vs London School of Commerce - LSC vs upGrad vs APJ Abdul Kalam Technological University - APJAKTU
Side-by-side comparison from 201 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, international, and globally-minded programs with diverse student body.
- +Strong focus on professional development through internships and career support.
- +Rich program offerings with opportunities for personal and academic growth.
- +Diverse student body and global community
- +Strong academic programs and industry-relevant knowledge
- +Supportive faculty and excellent placement support
- +Accessible resources and supportive faculty
- +Engaging learning environment and quality instruction
- +Opportunities for exposure and growth
Nothing to show
- +Expert faculty and enriching academic environment
- +Focus on practical learning and real-world preparation
- +Positive campus atmosphere and enjoyable student experience
Nothing to show
- +Practical, real-world business experience and skill development.
- +Unique global mobility and diverse cultural immersion opportunities.
- +Valuable industry connections and strong peer networking.
- -Lack of practical learning and perceived filler content.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Poor professor engagement and program support.
- -High tuition fees and poor job placement rates are a major concern.
- -Limited and often damaged recreational facilities detract from the student experience.
- -The university offers a poor value for money regarding services provided.
- -Administrative and communication issues cause stress.
- -Lack of support is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues disrupt the learning environment.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder effective learning.
- -Lack of essential resources and support services is a significant problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Communication from the institution is frequently unclear or lacking.
Reviewing the provided ratings, the institution demonstrates notable strengths in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving scores above 4.5. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerged as the area with the lowest rating, falling below 4.0. Other categories, including Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value, all scored commendably, generally ranging between 4.05 and 4.4.
This university demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, boasting a high rating. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive favorable scores. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Accomodation** are identified as areas with lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. The university presents a mixed but generally positive outlook across its evaluated components.
This institution shines brightest in its location, receiving a near-perfect score. Student life and internationality are also areas of moderate strength. Conversely, accommodation stands out as a significant weakness, along with the perceived value of the education. Ratings for facilities and professors are average.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates strong performance in several key areas, particularly with professors, student life, accommodation, and value, all receiving high marks. Location also scores well. However, facilities are rated moderately, and internationality stands out as the weakest area. Overall, students appear to be satisfied with most aspects of their experience, with some notable exceptions.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates a consistently strong performance across key areas. It excels particularly in **Internationality**, **Student Life**, and **Location**, all receiving top marks. **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Accomodation** also score highly. The **Value** proposition is well-regarded. While all ratings are impressive, the slight difference in scores suggests that the unique global atmosphere, vibrant campus experience, and convenient setting are standout features.
The vast majority of reviews (around 98%) are positive, praising the program's academic rigor, international environment, and career support. A small percentage of feedback (about 2%) expressed disappointment with limited practical learning and grading fairness.
With a 4.11/5 average rating from 128 reviews, ~83% praise the university for its diverse student body, supportive environment, and robust academic programs. A small minority (~0.8%) found it expensive with limited recreational facilities and placements.
The university receives predominantly positive feedback (~75%) with students praising supportive instructors and good facilities. A smaller portion of reviews (~25%) notes administrative delays and communication issues.
Nothing to show
University reviews are predominantly positive, with ~71% of feedback being highly favorable. Recurring positive themes include faculty expertise, practical learning focus, and campus environment. A minor point notes a preference for theoretical over practical learning in some programs.
Nothing to show
Most student reviews are highly positive, with ~83% rating 4-5 stars and an average of 4.5/5. Recurring themes include brilliant concepts, learning by doing, and valuable real-world business experience. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.