emlyon business school vs Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU vs International School of Management vs Chandigarh Group of Colleges - GCG vs Chitkara University

Side-by-side comparison from 222 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: International School of Management (4.60)
emlyon business school: wins 0/7 categories
Manipal Academy of Higher Education - MAHE - MU: wins 0/7 categories
International School of Management: wins 5/7 categories
Chandigarh Group of Colleges - GCG: wins 2/7 categories
Chitkara University: wins 0/7 categories
Guru Nanak Dev University - GNDU: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Dental Surgery
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Best programme: Computer Application
Best programme: Clinical Research
Best programme: Journalism and Mass Communication
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.22
4.12
4.64
Win
4.00
4.23
4.00
Not rated
Location
4.66
3.91
4.64
5.00
Win
3.95
4.55
Not rated
Professors
4.12
4.13
4.82
Win
3.00
3.95
4.18
Not rated
Internationality
4.63
3.17
4.82
5.00
Win
3.90
3.36
Not rated
Student life
4.30
4.30
4.50
Win
3.00
4.45
4.36
Not rated
Value
4.49
3.96
4.73
Win
3.00
3.78
4.18
Not rated
Accommodation
4.00
3.68
4.64
Win
2.00
3.58
3.73
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
  • +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
  • +Diverse program options and personal project development.
  • +Diverse student body and global community
  • +Strong academic programs and industry-relevant knowledge
  • +Supportive faculty and excellent placement support
  • +Expert professors and quality cohorts
  • +Flexible learning and personalized support
  • +Global exposure and networking opportunities
  • +Strong faculty & diverse courses
  • +Positive campus environment & student involvement
  • +Good placement records & cost-effectiveness
  • +Excellent academic quality and diverse programs.
  • +Supportive staff and conducive learning environment.
  • +Strong infrastructure, facilities, and extracurricular opportunities.
  • +Supportive faculty and excellent academic programs
  • +Modern infrastructure and well-equipped facilities
  • +Opportunities for cultural activities and career placement

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
  • -High tuition fees and poor job placement rates are a major concern.
  • -Limited and often damaged recreational facilities detract from the student experience.
  • -The university offers a poor value for money regarding services provided.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues are common complaints.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or in disrepair.
  • -Course content and teaching quality are frequently criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources impact the learning environment.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
  • -Subpar education quality and uninterested professors.
  • -Outdated teaching methods and disengagement.
  • -Limited resources and theoretical learning.
  • -Lack of practical, real-life experiences.
  • -Language barriers and poor induction for foreign students.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in **Student Life**, boasting a high rating. Areas such as **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive favorable scores. Conversely, **Internationality** and **Accomodation** are identified as areas with lower ratings, suggesting potential for improvement in these aspects. The university presents a mixed but generally positive outlook across its evaluated components.

This institution garners exceptional praise, particularly for its professors and international student experience, both scoring a near-perfect 4.82. Facilities, location, and accommodation also received strong marks around 4.64. Student life earned a solid 4.5, while value was rated a commendable 4.73. The university's weakest area, though still strong, is student life.

With excellent marks in both Location and Internationality, this institution truly shines in these areas. However, Accommodation is identified as a significant weakness, receiving the lowest rating. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Value received moderate scores, indicating room for improvement across these categories.

This university garners high marks for student life, with a rating of 4.45, and facilities also score well at 4.23. Conversely, accommodation presents the lowest score at 3.58. Other aspects like professors, location, internationality, and value fall within a respectable mid-range, indicating areas for potential improvement alongside commendable strengths.

This institution performs exceptionally well in several key areas. Its strongest ratings are for **Location** (4.55) and **Student Life** (4.36), indicating positive experiences in these domains. **Facilities** and **Value** also received solid scores of 4.18. The areas that scored lower, suggesting room for improvement, are **Internationality** (3.36) and **Accomodation** (3.73).

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.

With a 4.11/5 average rating from 128 reviews, ~83% praise the university for its diverse student body, supportive environment, and robust academic programs. A small minority (~0.8%) found it expensive with limited recreational facilities and placements.

All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.64/5. Students praise the high quality of professors, impressive and diverse student cohorts, and flexible learning options. The curriculum is described as relevant and contemporary, fostering significant personal and career growth.

With a 4.25/5 average, reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Recurring themes include good teachers, culture, placements, and a cost-effective environment, though some suggest a greater practical approach.

With a 4.24/5 average, ~94% of reviews are positive, praising quality education, good infrastructure, and facilities. A small ~6% express dissatisfaction with education quality and teaching methods.

Over 90% of reviews praise a supportive learning environment, well-organized academics, and good facilities. A small amount of feedback notes limited practical experience and potential language barriers for foreign students.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
63%
29%
64%
25%
41%
55%
0%
4★
27%
54%
36%
75%
53%
36%
0%
3★
10%
16%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
9%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Just starting and very happy

I am just starting my PhD journey and I could not be happier with my choice in ISM. Amazing experience with quality professors AND impressive cohorts. Working full-time, this educational focus would not be feasible if I was not able to be flexible as to when and where I take my classes. It is a tough, long, and robust path that requires focus, but the team at ISM is truly the best. They help navigate the way that will work best for you and not put you in a 'one way fits all' situation to accomplish this massive step. I wanted a global education that was through a recognized, accredited, and respected school and ISM has not just been that, but so much more.

A good placement tracker

its a good college , great culture , great teachers , great placement record , cost effective . but needs practical approach instead of theory , needs good experience corporate for better learning . environment is great with good facalities . rest is great to learn and study.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close